Tues 28Oct08 Dear Friends,
Across the countryJoe the Plumber's simple question to Barack Obama is taking on a life of its own. Barack Obama may want to "spread the wealth around" by taxing small businesses, but it's clear that average Americans don't agree. Here in Minnesota, we want to hear your "Joe the Plumber" story - whether you're a small business owner, employee, or just someone who believes that more taxes on average Americans will hurt our economy even more than it already is. To tell us your story, send an e-mail to mnjoetheplumber@johnmccain.com or click the image below. Ramsey County Attorney
To the State of Minnesota via Governor,Senate,House,All Agencies
For over 20 years the State of MN primnarily DFL have reduced us to
Proverty, "taken" our Homes even tho Taxes Paid Sharon and Bill Protected Class,
"Spread the Wealth" has "taken from the Poor and given to Obama???
Legal Notice of potential Vote Fraud, by Public Officials
blocking E-access, E-Commerce etc.Tax/Election Challenges
By DFL Ramsey County Attorney Susan Gaertner
QUESTIONS: Has the DFL County Attorney manulipated not only the Voting Process
, Tax Challenges, "but for" the 21Oct08 Ramsey Board Meeting, Kay Wittgenstein trying to set up- an
Un funded Mandate with huge Staff already employed with the City and County to find "Clients" for Elder Abuse..
QUESTIONS: Have City Attorney Jerry Hendrickson and County Attorney Darwin Lookingbill, for years manulipated the "due process" equal Treatment, giving "Ineffective Assistance of Counsel" to the County Board and City Counsel:,to perpatrate "Jobs" for Lawyers, with the Public be damned?
It appears that your rca@co.ramsey.mn.us is not a valid address? Further the DHS urls are inoperable
In this time of serious Tax/Election Criminal Charges please provide a tax-supported valid e-mail for County Attorney.
The original message was received at Tue, 28 Oct 2008 09:47:11 -0400 (EDT)
from root@localhost
*** ATTENTION ***
Your e-mail is being returned to you because there was a problem with its
delivery. The address which was undeliverable is listed in the section
labeled: "----- The following addresses had permanent fatal errors -----".
The reason your mail is being returned to you is listed in the section
labeled: "----- Transcript of Session Follows -----".
The line beginning with "<<<" describes the specific reason your e-mail could not be delivered. The next line contains a second error message which is a general translation for other e-mail servers. Please direct further questions regarding this message to the e-mail administrator or Postmaster at that destination. --AOL Postmaster ----- The following addresses had permanent fatal errors -----
(reason: 550 No such user - psmtp)
----- Transcript of session follows -----
... while talking to co.ramsey.mn.us.s6a1.psmtp.com.:
>>> RCPT To:
<<<>... User unknown
451 4.4.1 reply: read error from cob-medge-loaner.itg.state.mn.us.
451 4.4.1 reply: read error from mplsfe-medge.itg.state.mn.us.
Final-Recipient: RFC822; rca@co.ramsey.mn.us
Action: failed
Status: 5.1.1
Remote-MTA: DNS; co.ramsey.mn.us.s6a1.psmtp.com
Diagnostic-Code: SMTP; 550 No such user - psmtp
Last-Attempt-Date: Tue, 28 Oct 2008 09:47:16 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from Sharon4Anderson@aol.com
by imo-m19.mx.aol.com (mail_out_v39.1.) id 8.ce0.3bf4f8ea (14502);
Tue, 28 Oct 2008 09:47:11 -0400 (EDT)
Return-path:
From: Sharon4Anderson@aol.com
Message-ID:
Date: Tue, 28 Oct 2008 09:47:08 EDT
Subject: Check out Disability Services - Programs & Services-minnesota's home and comm
To: tim.pawlenty@state.mn.us, webmaster@state.mn.us
CC: attorney.general@state.mn.us, rca@co.ramsey.mn.us
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="-----------------------------1225201628"
X-Mailer: AOL 9.0 VR sub 5004
X-Spam-Flag:NO
Bill Dahn and Sharon Anderson aka Scarrella have Standing as they Voted in the Primary9Sept08 to be filled 4Nov08
Sharon Anderson Implementing pdf Elecions_Voting http://sharon4staterep64a .blogspot.com , US President,Congress State Rep64a, Challenge Judicial Elections that disenfranchise the Voters,Contrary to Separation of Powers
/s/ Sharon4Anderson@aol.com ECF_P165913_sa1299 Click here: Sharon4Council file4[1]Shar_thune_22.pdf - Google Docs
Disclaimer on Site'sThe Electronic Communications Privacy Act MY FindLaw (ECPA) sets out the provisions for access, use, disclosure, interception and privacy protections of electronic communications. Sharon4Anderson Scribd pdf files. The law was enacted in 1986 and covers various forms of wire and electronic communications. According to the U.S. Code, electronic communications "means any transfer of signs, signals, writing, images, sounds, data, or intelligence of any nature transmitted in whole or in part by a wire, radio, electromagnetic, photo electronic or photo optical system that affects interstate or foreign commerce." ECPA prohibits unlawful access and certain disclosures of communication contents. Additionally, the law prevents government entities from requiring disclosure of electronic communications from a provider without proper procedure. The Legal Institute provides Title 18 of the U.S. Code, which encompasses ECPA. Blogger: Dashboard AndersonAdvocates/ddaweborg.msnw
NOTICE: This communication is not encrypted. This e-mail (including any attachments) is covered by the Electronic Communications Privacy Act, 18 U.S.C. §§ 2510-2521, and Electronic Communications Privacy Act The CAN-SPAM Act: Requirements for Commercial Emailers
http://www.ca6.uscourts.gov/opinions.pdf/08a0374p-06.pdf
RECOMMENDED FOR FULL-TEXT PUBLICATION
Pursuant to Sixth Circuit Rule 206
File Name: 08a0374p.06
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT
_________________
O
HIO REPUBLICAN PARTY; LARRY WOLPERT,Plaintiffs-Appellees,
v.
J
ENNIFER BRUNNER, Secretary of State of Ohio,Defendant-Appellant.
X----
>,-N
No. 08-4322
Filed: October 14, 2008
Before: BOGGS, Chief Circuit Judge; MARTIN, BATCHELDER, DAUGHTREY, MOORE,
COLE, CLAY, GILMAN, GIBBONS, ROGERS, SUTTON, COOK, McKEAGUE, GRIFFIN,
KETHLEDGE, and WHITE, Circuit Judges.
_________________
ORDER
_________________
A majority of the Judges of the Court in regular active service have voted to hear this case
en banc
, thus vacating the stay of the Temporary Restraining Order, and to deny the motion of theAppellant Secretary of State to vacate or stay the district court’s TRO.
Attached to this order are the opinions of SUTTON, Circuit Judge, joined by Chief Circuit
Judge BOGGS and BATCHELDER, GILMAN, GIBBONS, COOK, McKEAGUE, GRIFFIN, and
KETHLEDGE, Circuit Judges, concurring with the order; the separate writing of BATCHELDER,
Circuit Judge; the opinion of GIBBONS, Circuit Judge, joined by BOGGS, Chief Circuit Judge, and
BATCHELDER, GILMAN, SUTTON, COOK, McKEAGUE, GRIFFIN, and KETHLEDGE,
Circuit Judges, concurring with the order; the statement of ROGERS, Circuit Judge, concurring with
the order; and the opinion of KETHLEDGE, Circuit Judge, joined by GIBBONS and SUTTON,
Circuit Judges, concurring with the order. Also attached is the opinion of MOORE, Circuit Judge,
joined by MARTIN, DAUGHTREY, COLE, and CLAY, Circuit Judges, dissenting from the order;
the opinion of MARTIN, Circuit Judge, joined by DAUGHTREY, COLE, and CLAY, Circuit
Judges, dissenting from the order; and the opinion of WHITE, Circuit Judge, joined by
DAUGHTREY and COLE, Circuit Judges, dissenting from the order. Not all judges have been able
to respond, or to prepare additional separate writings and, should there be any such revisions or
additional writings, this order will be re-issued with all separate writings appended thereto.
1
VOTE ABSENTEE SAT.1NOV.08
Public Officials.
that may be viewed using 
