Monday, August 11, 2008

Sharon Anderson DataDemand vacant bldg.list_Death Don Boxmeyer_Sympathys

JUST HEARD DON BOXMEYER DIED: O MY GOD, SYMPATHYS ANOTHER ERA LOST
TO HISTORY IN ST. PAUL
MON.11Aug08
TO THE ABOVE NAMED: DEMAND THAT HE ALLEGED VACANT BUILDING LISTINGS, AS OF
8AUG.08 LISTED 2003. , apparantly "taken" down from www.ci.stpaul.mn.us arbitrarily.
be reinstated online and or e-copy e-mailed to the undersiged Sharon Anderson
Candidate 64a from hr Legal Domicile 1058 Summit,St.Paul,MN 55104-0384
LEGAL QUESTIONS:
Has a Legal Contract Breech occurred by "false statements" of City Employees
stating the link of vacant buildings as of 8Aug08 was 2003, is broken,
" You have to call Steve Magner, and the listing
will not be available until the middle of September"
If in Fact a Contract Breech of E-Commerce has occurred by any city employee
could it therefore be construed, that an Election E-Commerce with Voting, Payment of Taxes
may be a Breech of Public Trust?
" received your voice mail and am responding to your question regarding the Vacant Building List. You are correct, the list is not currently on our site due to technical difficulties. I would be happy to have a copy of the list mailed to you. Please let me know what address you would like it mailed to."
Thank you,
Andrea Casselton
Director of Technology and Communications
15 West Kellogg Blvd, Room 110
Saint Paul, MN 55102
Ph: 651.266.8910
Fax: 651.266.8689
Sharon Scarrella Anderson has made various calls to have the listings immediately
placed back online and or State and Federal Investigations tjriggered.
The case involved rival bidders at auctions conducted by the Treasurer's Office in Cook
County, Illinois, during which the County auctions off tax liens on real property whose owners
have failed to pay property tax. One of the bidders, Phoenix Bond, filed suit against another
group of bidders (Bridge), alleging that they had not followed auction rules and had made
fraudulent statements to the Treasurer's Office regarding their bidding practices. Cook County
apparently was not injured by the alleged misstatements; it received the same proceeds from the
auctions that it would have received even in the absence of the misstatements. But Phoenix
Bond alleges that it was injured by Bridge's misstatements: those misstatements allegedly
resulted in more tax liens being awarded to Bridge and fewer being awarded to Phoenix Bond.n
CivicPlus - Contact Us Toll Free: 1-888-228-2233
Fax: 785-587-8951Contact
DSI Code Enforcement Bob Kessler
Help Desk

http://www.civicplus.com/index.asp?NID=
Contact
John Choi
City Attorney
400 City Hall and Courthouse
15 Kellogg Blvd., West
Saint Paul, MN 55102

Ph: (651) 266-8710
Fx: (651) 298-5619

Laura Munsch, Vice President of Sales



Laura Munsch Website Consultant Vice President, Midwest Region 888-228-2233 ext. 231 munsch@civicplus.com
Powered by
CivicPlus with Data Breech of vacant building listings

FURTHER AFFIANT SAYETH NOT AT THIS TIME REQUEST HAS BEEN MADE
Click here: Sharon4Council file4[1]Shar_thune_22.pdf - Google Docs
Disclaimer on Site'sThe Electronic Communications Privacy Act
MY FindLaw (ECPA) sets out the provisions for access, use, disclosure, interception and privacy protections of electronic communications. Sharon4Anderson Scribd pdf files. The law was enacted in 1986 and covers various forms of wire and electronic communications. According to the U.S. Code, electronic communications "means any transfer of signs, signals, writing, images, sounds, data, or intelligence of any nature transmitted in whole or in part by a wire, radio, electromagnetic, photo electronic or photo optical system that affects interstate or foreign commerce." ECPA prohibits unlawful access and certain disclosures of communication contents. Additionally, the law prevents government entities from requiring disclosure of electronic communications from a provider without proper procedure. The Legal Institute provides Title 18 of the U.S. Code, which encompasses ECPA. Blogger: Dashboard AndersonAdvocates/ddaweborg.msnw

NOTICE: This communication is not encrypted. This e-mail (including any attachments) is covered by the Electronic Communications Privacy Act, 18 U.S.C. §§ 2510-2521, and Electronic Communications Privacy Act The CAN-SPAM Act: Requirements for Commercial Emailers