Steinhauser vs CitySt.Paul et al
Sunday, August 31, 2008
Sharon Anderson Candidate 64a http://sharon4staterep64a.blogspot.com
rumored that several Church's are harboring Protestors????
If this is true our RNC St. Paul Security has Rights to know
StarTribune.com media requires the Adobe Flash plug-in. Download it here.
Updated August 31, 2008
m.k. smithAuthorities defend search warrants of raids, while activists question intent. Still photography by David Joles, Star Tribune
Saturday, August 30, 2008
Get details and RSVP for these FREE sessions at: Politico.com/ConventionConversations
Wednesday, August 27, 2008
Sharon4Anderson@aol.com telfx: 651-776-5835
Legal Domicile 1058 Summit Ave,St.Paul,MN PO Box4384
With Sincere Appreciaton for your Time to VOTE 9Sept08
Republican Primary Sharon with Meg bring our ISSUES:
Sharon, Forensic Analyst, VA Widow Private AG,Attorney Pro Se
Comes Now to make the Citizenery WHOLE by Implementing
E-Commerce, E-Voting, Abolish/Repeal Unpublished Opinions
used to STEAL our Property Rights Thank You.
Hillary as Obama's Attorney?
The Columbia Journalism Review points this morning to mixed metaphors from the Los Angeles Times in its coverage of Sen. Hillary Clinton's speech last night at the Democratic National Convention. One LA Times article employed what the CJR describes as a "lawyerly lead," portraying her speech as that of a courtroom advocate making her closing argument for Barack Obama's cause, while another described her as "the good soldier." Here's that lawyerly lead, as published by the CJR:
Shari Moore City Clerk Email 310 City Hall
15 Kellogg Blvd., WestSaint Paul, MN 55102Ph: (651) 266-8688 Fx: (651) 266-8574
|6.||Resolution - 08-931 - Accepting a donation from Motorola of equipment and services, valued at $2,888,197, to be used for the 2008 Republican National Convention. (GS 3058335)|
Saint Paul RICO UPDATE/ PLAINTIFFS’ JOINT MEMORANDUM OF LAW IN OPPOSITION TO SUMMARY JUDGMENT - AMENDED
|AGENDA OF THE SAINT PAUL CITY COUNCIL|
Wednesday, August 27, 2008 - 3:30 p.m.
CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS, 3RD FLOOR
City Hall and Court House
15 West Kellogg Boulevard
|CONSENT AGENDA (Items 1 - 30)|
|COMMUNICATIONS AND ADMINISTRATIVE ORDERS|
|1.||Claims of Claire T. Anderson, Molly R. Bruski, Stan O. Dazier, James J. Esparza, Paul H. French, Harris K. Haugen, Dave Hendrickson, Chou Thao, Tin V. Tran, and Stacey L. Walsh.|
Tony Mauro05-1074.pdf Ledbetter v. Goodyear Tire
THEREFORE: AFFIANT Sharon Anderson makes NOTE of the Minnesota Secretary of State Mark Ritchie said Monday that the Republican Party's rules committee will vote on whether to adopt something called "the Ohio Plan.''
Sharon and others have been disenfranchised from Voting in a Presidential Primary, Sharon would like to see John McCain have US Senator DFL Hillary Clinton as Vice President.
Once election Primarys for US President - Google Search season ends, look for new efforts to fix the presidential nomination system
By Doug Grow Tuesday, Aug. 26, 2008
DENVER — Just months ago, folks were heatedly arguing over the nation's primary system and the power of superdelegates. Now, the focus is all on the fall elections. But the issue is coming back. Proposals abound for changing the system, and if successful, Minnesota could get its own presidential primary.
C. Affiant has given Legal E-Notice sincScarrella221NW2d562Justice.jpg (image) e 1992
Disclaimer on Site'sThe Electronic Communications Privacy Act MY FindLaw (ECPA) sets out the provisions for access, use, disclosure, interception and privacy protections of electronic communications. Sharon4Anderson Scribd pdf files. The law was enacted in 1986 and covers various forms of wire and electronic communications. According to the U.S. Code, electronic communications "means any transfer of signs, signals, writing, images, sounds, data, or intelligence of any nature transmitted in whole or in part by a wire, radio, electromagnetic, photo electronic or photo optical system that affects interstate or foreign commerce." ECPA prohibits unlawful access and certain disclosures of communication contents. Additionally, the law prevents government entities from requiring disclosure of electronic communications from a provider without proper procedure. The Legal Institute provides Title 18 of the U.S. Code, which encompasses ECPA. Blogger: Dashboard AndersonAdvocates/ddaweborg.msnw
NOTICE: This communication is not encrypted. This e-mail (including any attachments) is covered by the Electronic Communications Privacy Act, 18 U.S.C. §§ 2510-2521, and Electronic Communications Privacy Act The CAN-SPAM Act: Requirements for Commercial Emailers
Monday, August 25, 2008
With Sincere ThankYou, Appreciate your Vote 9Sept08 in the Republican Party Primary
64a MN House of Representatives MN House of Representatives - Google Search
Rights of the People: Individual Freedom and the Bill of Rights
|USINFO > Publications|
Saturday, August 23, 2008
Must Jerry Henderickson be "Debarment" ? Ineffective Assistance of Counsel, Salary over $100,xxx.xx yrly
Please read Briefs:http://www.stpaul.gov/DocumentView.asp?DID=5788
Please read the Contracts:City of St. Paul, MN - Official Website
Interference with Contract Complance ie: Citizens Homeowner Insurance,Car Ins, avoiding legal process http://nancylazaryan.blogspot.com/
Covertly denying e-commerce Legal Notice's of Sharon Anderson
On Sun, Aug 17, 2008 at 9:14 AM, <Sharon4Anderson@aol.com> wrote:
DEBARMENT WORKS BOTH WAYS, MISCONDUCT OF CITY OFFICIALS
|31.||First Reading - 08-894 - An ordinance creating Chapter 185 of the Saint Paul Legislative Code to regulate contract compliance. (GS 3058197)|
Debarment means an action * * *covered Transaction * * *
- Sec. 95.01. Policy.
- Sec. 95.02. Definitions.
- Sec. 95.03. Applicability.
- Sec. 95.04. Effect of action.
- Sec. 95.05. Causes for debarment.
- Sec. 95.06. Debarment process.
- Sec. 95.07. Process for appeal.
- Sec. 95.08. Debarment period.
- Sec. 95.09. Human rights violations.
- Sec. 95.10. Debarment records.
- Sec. 95.11. Business licensing.
Sec. 95.01. Policy.
(a) In order to protect the public interest, it is the policy of the city to conduct business only with responsible persons. Debarment and suspension are discretionary actions that, taken in accordance with this chapter, are appropriate means to implement this policy. The city shall not solicit proposals from, award agreements to, or approve or consent to subagreements with organizations and individuals that are suspended, proposed for debarment, debarred, ineligible or voluntarily excluded.
(b) Debarment and suspension are serious actions which shall be used only in the public interest and for the city's protection and not for purposes of punishment. The city may impose debarment or suspension for the causes and in accordance with the procedures set forth in these regulations.
(c) The existence of a cause for debarment or suspension, however, does not necessarily require that the contractor be debarred; the seriousness of the contractor's acts or omissions and any mitigating factors should be considered in making any debarment decision.
Tech Firms Pitch Tools For Sifting Legal Records
Will Technology Displace Lawyers in e-Discovery?
Remember the folk tale of John Henry, the railway worker who went head to head in a contest of efficiency with a steam-drill to prove that man was superior to machine? Henry beat the machine, but worked himself to death to do it.
I was reminded of John Henry in reading this Tech Firms Pitch Tools" href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB121936262421062033.html?mod=googlenews_wsj
Tech Firms Pitch Tools">Wall Street Journal article about law firms' efforts to stave off automation of the e-discovery process. As WSJ reports, tech companies are developing tools that can perform many tasks previously handled by teams of attorneys -- such as weeding out duplicate or irrelevant material and identifying privileged documents. Automation results in substantial cost savings since by culling documents, lawyers can review a smaller amount of material. According to Hewlett-Packard, automated e-discovery tools could reduce the cost of review of 100 gigabytes of data from $180,000 to $25,000.
But law firms aren't convinced that these new tools are effective and remain concerned that companies may wind up spending more money in the long run to fix mistakes. For example, Robert Brownstone, a partner at Fenwick & West, described a situation where a client declined to have attorneys oversee an e-mail archive search, relying on internal IT staff to handle the job for less. The IT workers disposed of files that legally, needed to be preserved -- and while the documents were recovered, the client also wound up paying Fenwick more to fix the problem than it would have cost to retain the firm for oversight at the outset.
Are today's lawyers the new John Henrys of discovery, a last line in the sand to preserve a way of doing business that's fast fading into the sunset? Like John Henry, lawyers correctly make the point that not everything can be automated and that by relying on machines, we lose some of the craftsmanship and judgment that individuals bring to a project. On the other hand, John Henry worked himself to death to prove his point -- is that really what lawyers want?
H/T EDD Blog Online.
A growing number of tech companies are riding the rising flood of corporate email and electronic records by pitching software to sift them -- and meeting resistance from lawyers who want a piece of the action.
Lawsuits increasingly rely on electronic documents being produced early on, feeding demand for tools that help archive and retrieve those records, a process known as e-discovery work. Much of that work requires little brainpower or legal training, says Michael Lynch, chief executive of British software company Autonomy Corp., which last year acquired e-discovery company Zantaz for $375 million.
"The old-fashioned way of doing this
2007 Sharon StPaul Ward(2) Election
- ► 2015 (23)
- ► 2011 (62)
- ► 2009 (90)
- McCain_Palin_Loves to Reform_Rectify Gustav v. GOP...
- Wrath of God_Turbulence of Nature_GOP_Bob Fletcher...
- WELCOME Sara "Barracuda"Palin,John McCain_RNC
- VOTE Sharon Anderson_64a_MNHouse_9Sept08
- Jerry Henderickson City Counsel Lawyer"Debarment"
- NancyLazaryan Private AG_KathyLantry denies certif...
- Martha Kuh _Mpls_Swindle TaxpayersSharons Ballot
- Sharon Anderson Constitutional Voting Ballot_S&C
- Sharons 64a MN House_E-Elections_
- Sharon's 64A_MN House_VoteSmart_WTP
- Sharons 64a Courage Test VoteSmart_WTP
- Mpls.MN Voters Guide_Shar_64a_Allison Evenson
- Sharons legal challenge to LOGIS-CIVICPLUS
- CityStPaul,MNClerk Shari Moore,ISP_CivilPlus_PC_Va...
- Sharon Anderson DataDemand vacant bldg.list_Death ...
- Rev Sharon Scarrella v. Midwest Fed.S&L_536F2d 120...
- Illegal Assessments by City St.Paul,MN
- Sharons Legal Objections to Wed6Jul08 Agenda
- STOP! Bob Johnson Blog Man:Libel/Malice to SharonS...
- Aug 7th08 Meeting via E Commerce Sharon4Anderson@a...
- ▼ August (22)