Thurs.3Oct2019
SHARONS QUITAM COMPLAINT MS609.43 MISCONDUCT COUNCIL
ENBANC NOTICED TO MNAG DFL KEITH ELLISON.
sharons-whistleblowerblog.blogspot.com
Sharons Response to 651-457-1177
SHARONS QUITAM COMPLAINT MS609.43 MISCONDUCT COUNCIL
ENBANC NOTICED TO MNAG DFL KEITH ELLISON.
sharons-whistleblowerblog.blogspot.com
IN THE MATTER OF
QUITAM RELATOR https://tacky-journalism.blogspot.com/
WIDOW ,WHITE,WOMAN,WHISTLEBLOWER, SHARON ANDERSON AKA PETERSON AKA SCARRELLA, This case is Br
Referendum Lawsuit Court Filings - St Paul Trash Referendum Lawsuituce Clark, et al. v. City of St. Paul, et al, Ramsey County File # 62-CV-19-857
Sharon4Council
Referendum Lawsuit Court Filings - St Paul Trash Referendum Lawsuituce Clark, et al. v. City of St. Paul, et al, Ramsey County File # 62-CV-19-857
Sharon4Council
BY AND THRO MNAG DFL KEITH ELLISON State of Minnesota,
VS
RELATEES Justice Lory Gildea RAMSEY COUNTY ELECTIONS,ST.PAUL AND CITY COUNCIL ENBANC,MAYOR MELVIN CARTER,ATTORNEYS UNK, CITY CHARTER
,CONSTITUTIONALITY ORD 18-39 City Charter and Codes | Saint Paul, Minnesot
EXCESSIVE INSPECTIONS,CONSENT AGENDA'S BALLOT
Sharons Response to 651-457-1177
Anderson+Advocates,http://www.msnusers.com/AndersonAdvocates 2007 Sharons Answers to City unabated
In a message dated 10/2/2019 3:06:48 PName: Sharon Anderson
Public Office Sought: Saint Paul City Council
Email: Sharon4Anderson@aol.com
Phone: 651-776-5835
Website: sharon4council.blogspot.com
Twitter Handle: @sharon4anderson
Facebook: Sharon Anderson
Candidate Bio
Self taught Blogger Home Town, Homegrown Legal Research Analyst,tracking City Hall over 40 yrs.Similarily Situated Homeowners,Seniors,Disable and Vunerable who cannot Speak or Fight4themselves. Sharon must Educate the Public on Sharia Law, Influx of Muslins who take their Oath on the Quran,contrary to USA Constitution. Sharon Learned about Law and Computers. Exposing Government Misconduct re M Central Standard Time, amy@stpaulpublishing.com writes:
Public Office Sought: Saint Paul City Council
Email: Sharon4Anderson@aol.com
Phone: 651-776-5835
Website: sharon4council.blogspot.com
Twitter Handle: @sharon4anderson
Facebook: Sharon Anderson
Candidate Bio
Self taught Blogger Home Town, Homegrown Legal Research Analyst,tracking City Hall over 40 yrs.Similarily Situated Homeowners,Seniors,Disable and Vunerable who cannot Speak or Fight4themselves. Sharon must Educate the Public on Sharia Law, Influx of Muslins who take their Oath on the Quran,contrary to USA Constitution. Sharon Learned about Law and Computers. Exposing Government Misconduct re M Central Standard Time, amy@stpaulpublishing.com writes:
Hi Sharon,As I mentioned in my voicemail, we’re working on our November issue of the St. Paul Voice, published Oct. 28. This issue will include our coverage of the Nov. 5 election. Please answer the following questions and return your responses no later than Wednesday, Oct. 9.Also, please include a photo for the article as well. It must be jpg, head and shoulders, 200 dpi or larger.Full name:Sharon Anderson aka Peterson aka Scarrella:Retired Blogger political ActivistEndorsements: naPolitical experience:Trump Supporter BloggerNumber of years living in Ward 2: Purchased 1058 Summit Ave 1973 Homestead taken as taxes paid,No Mortgage, Just Compensation Denied, Triggers Court Corruption.Reason you are running for office:Exposing City and County Ponzi Taxing Schemes. Election,Immigration, Tax Reforms, Illegal interest charges on fraudulent Ratification,NonPROFITS RE District HEATING, Housing Issues,Bloated Government. Trash Litigation Constitutional Charter Issues http://sharon4anderson.org(This is your chance to address the top two or three issues facing Ward 2. Please be concise. Answers will be edited for brevity and clarity.)1. Disparity of St. Pauls $69Mill next to Xcel vs. $100Mill Homeless ie Higher Ground vs. Landlord Settlement NO USSC.10-1032 Agreed motion to dismiss by Thomas C. Goldstein et al, and not by Frank Steinhauser. over 200MillionIn a message dated 9/4/2019 3:42:22 PM Central Standard Time, John@mannillowomack.com writes:2. Citys Mob Rule via Excessive Inspections Stealing our Homes via DSI Fraudulent without Valid Complaints,Illegal Legislative Hearings,City Amy Bredmoen Sponsoring Resolutions without Quiet,Marketable Titles, without Testimoney of DSI Inspectors,3. Wilful NEGLIENCE of City to Address since 2007 Theft of Car,Trailers Wat
Anderson+Advocates,http://www.msnusers.com/AndersonAdvocateserFURTHER CANDIDATE QUITAM WHISTLEBLOWER AFFIANT WIDOW SHARON ANDERSON SAYETH NOT AT THIS TIME EXCEPT ON THE GRAVES OF TENANTS IN COMMON, PARENTS BILL AND BERNICE PETERSON, GRAVES OF BOTH HUSBANDS SCARRELLA AND ANDERSON BOTH KOREN VETS.MEMORANDUM OF FEDERAL LAWS UNABATED BY STATE,COUNTY,CITY OFFICIALS FOR DECADES.Criminal Interference with Right to Fair Housing, 42 U.S.C. § 3631. Section 3631 of Title 42 makes it unlawful for an individual to use force or threaten to use force to injure, intimidate, or interfereDeprivation of Rights Under Color of Law, 18 U.S.C. § 242. This provision makes it a crime for a person acting under color of any law to willfully deprive a person of a right or privilege protectedPeonage, 18 U.S.C. § 1581. Section 1581 of Title 18 makes it unlawful to hold a person in "debt servitude," or peonage, whichInvoluntary Servitude, 18 U.S.C. § 1584. Section 1584 of Title 18 makes it unlawful to hold a person in a condition of slavery, thatConspiracy Against Rights, 18 U.S.C. § 241. Section 241 of Title 18 is the civil rights conspiracy statute. Section 241 makes it unlawfulCriminal Interference with Right to Fair Housing, 42 U.S.C. § 3631. Section 3631 of Title 42 makes it unlawful for an individual to use force or threaten to use force to injure, intimidate, or interfereDeprivation of Rights Under Color of Law, 18 U.S.C. § 242. This provision makes it a crime for a person acting under color of any law to willfully deprive a person of a right or privilege protectedPeonage, 18 U.S.C. § 1581. Section 1581 of Title 18 makes it unlawful to hold a person in "debt servitude," or peonage, whichInvoluntary Servitude, 18 U.S.C. § 1584. Section 1584 of Title 18 makes it unlawful to hold a person in a condition of slavery, thatOriginal in Court FilesSubscribed to and sworn before methis _______ day of April, 2006. ____________________Mrs. Sharon AndersonLoyal Trump Supporter re member of Judicial Watch ie Honest Attorney Tom Fitten.
Tipsheet 09-23-19 | Judicial WatchTipsheet 09-23-19SEPTEMBER 23, 2019 | JUDICIAL WATCHJudicial Watch Sues DOJ for Electronic Communication that Initiated Counterintelligence Investigation of President Trump’s 2016 Campaign- In March 2018, based upon the information ...ONTHE GRAVES OF TENANTS IN COMMON AND MURDER OF SHARONS 2ND HUSBAND, must continue tracking city,county,courts in the Ponzi taxing schemes. Sharons 100 Blogs, http://sharon4anderson.org
NUMEROUS DEFAULT JUDGMENTSWebmaster at legistar has changed settings? so tracking is difficult,FURTHER EXCESSIVE INSPECTIONS apparantly now decend to particulars or separate address's. HOWEVER SHARON by way of the Mpls Strib, Reporter DEEDposs article below $69Mill XcelEnergy vs. 100Mill Homeless is Questionable. Further the Bizzare Anti-trust Settlement of USSC 10-1032 TITLED Magner vs. Gallagher,Judicial Watch separately obtained documents under the Minnesota Data Practices Act, showing that St. Paul City Attorney Sara Grewing arranged a meeting between the chief of DOJ’s Civil Rights Division, Tom Perez, and Mayor Chris Coleman a week before the city’s withdrawal from the case, captioned Magner v. Gallagher. Following Perez’s visit, the city withdrew its case and thanked DOJ and officials at HUD for their involvement.
eeting Name: City Council Agenda status: Final
Meeting date/time: 9/25/2019 3:30 PM Minutes status: Draft
Meeting location: Council Chambers - 3rd Floor
The Library Board will convene during the City Council meeting.
Published agenda: Agenda
Published minutes: Not available
Meeting video:
Attachments:
File # Date Name District Opinion Comment Action RES 19-1572 9/21/2019 8:46 PM Peter Butler Against I'm opposed to a $27 million property tax increase for overpriced trash service. Why are you placing haulers before so many other city needs? RES PH 19-206 8/23/2019 7:37 AM CandidateSharonAnderson Against -2 19-1587
RES 19-1572 9/24/2019 3:43 AM Eric Lein Against AGAINST the $27 Million for trash hauler protection payments. City negotiators, city staff, city attorneys, and city councilmembers failed to create, adopt and implement a program that treats ALL customers equitably. Forcing all property owners citywide to pay for the city's faulty decisions compounds existing errors and is way beyond reasonable.
Approving a 2020 maximum property tax levy for the Housing and
Redevelopment Authority (HRA).
Sponsors: Tolbert
Attachments: 2020 HRA Proposed Budget
18 RES
19-1572
Approving a 2020 maximum property tax levy for the City of Saint Paul.
Sponsors: Brendmoen
ORDINANCES
An ordinance is a city law enacted by the City Council. It is read at four separate council
meetings and becomes effective after passage by the Council and 30 days after publication in
the Saint Paul Legal Ledger. Public hearings on ordinances are held at the third reading.
Second Reading
19 Ord 19-60 Amending Chapter 66 of the Legislative Code pertaining to overnight
shelters.
Sponsors: Noecker
Proposed Amendment
PC Resolution 19-43
pcactionminutes090619
Downtown Overnight Shelter Zoning Study PC memo - post PH
Attachments:
City of Saint Paul Page 5 Printed on 9/19/2019
City Council Meeting
$69M apartment/hotel complex project next to Xcel Energy Center set to break ground - StarTribune.com
$69M apartment/hotel complex project next to Xcel Energy Center set to break ground
St Paul really setting the bar low , a homeshelter cost$100million this project cost $69m Theisproject should've been taller with the iconic view of the Capitol and the cathedral.Even the suburbs are building taller buildings.Construction starts soon on the $69 million project near the Xcel Center.My northern Minnesota back yard during an autumn past.
Aaron J. Brown is an Iron Range blogger, author, radio producer and columnist for the Hibbing Daily Tribune.The stages of a year are a lot like the stages of life. Each one has something to teach youxxDee DePass
Reporter | ManufacturingEmail: dee.depass@startribune.comPhone: 612-673-7725Location: MinneapolisOther languages: NoneDee DePass is a business reporter for the Star Tribune. She spent the last four years covering Minnesota's
To Above Named; Note to Reporter Fred Melo
Sicko-City StPaul: Assessments without Authorityplease note Sharon was Candidate Ward 2 in 2007 to make City Accountable stemming from the Auditor Lou McKenna Days 1980's Corruption in Propertys and TaxesSharon Anderson aka Scarrella 651-776-5835 sharon4anderson@aol.comLEGAL NOTICE: /s/Sharon4Anderson@aol.com ECF_P165913Pacersa1299 telfx: 651-776-5835:
Attorney ProSe_InFact,Private Attorney General QuiTam Whistleblower, www.taxthemax.blogspot.com
The Electronic Communications Privacy Act, 18 U.S.C.
Ch.119 Sections 2510-2521 et seq., governs distribution of this "Message,"
including attachments, may contain the originator's
proprietary information. The originator hereby notifies
recipients Message review, dissemination, copying, and content-based
actions. Authorized carriers of this message
shall expeditiously deliver this Message to intended recipients. See: Quon
v. Arch
Saint Paul STRONG had sent the email below to all the candidates for City
Sunday, September 1, 2019
StPaulWard2CandidateSharonScarrellaAndersonvsJusticeDavidLillhaugremoval
In a message dated 9/1/2019 9:31:27 AM Central Standard Time,jghoeschler@gmail.com writes:Please take me off your list. I am trying to reduce emails since I seldom check them. JGHLegal Notice to Lawyer John Hoeschler et alAffiant will delete your e address pr your request.
Sicko-City StPaulHOWEVER: Electronic Commerce prevails.Civil and RICO Charges vs. now Justice David LillhaugDisparity of Cases published.Sorry about that altho your case is public Mill OverlayPelham may affect Propertys of interest.I see your cases re Fees Taxes are laid over toSept 18
City Council | Saint Paul, Minnesota or 25 2019Affiants Candidate Widow,Whistleblower interests are the Disparity of Private Lawyer David Lillhaug given Judgship in MN Supreme Court.then Ruling on Fees,Taxes,Row vs. City St. Paul.David Lillhaug making Dirty Deals with City St. Paul re USSC 10-1032AS a Private Lawyer complicit with DFL Nat.Chair Tom PerezIn early February 2012, Assistant Attorney General Thomas E. Perez made a secret deal behind closed doors with St. Paul, Minnesota, Mayor Christopher Coleman and St. Paul’s outside counsel, David Lillehaug. Perez agreed to commit the Department of Justice to declining intervention in a False Claims Act qui tam complaint filed by whistleblower Fredrick Newell against the City of St. Paul, as well as a second qui tam complaint pending against the City, in exchange for the City’s commitment to withdraw its appeal in Magner v. Gallagher from the Supreme Court, an appeal involving the validity of disparate impact claims under the Fair Housing Act. Perez sought, facilitated, and consummated this deal because he feared that the Court would find disparate impact unsupported by the text of the Fair Housing Act. Calling disparate impact theory the “lynchpin” of civil rights enforcement, Perez simply could not allow the Court to rule. Perez sought leverage to stop the City from pressing its appeal. His search led him to David Lillehaug and then to Newell’s lawsuit against the City. Fredrick Newell, a minister and small-business owner in St. Paul, hadWhen the presumption of validity afforded the assessment is rebutted, a district court has a duty as fact-finder to independently determine whether the amount of an assessment exceeds the special benefits to the property. Ewert, 278 N.W.2d at 548, 552; In re Vill. of Burnsville, 310 Minn. at 41, 245 N.W.2d at 451; Nyquist v. Town of Center, Crow Wing Cty., 312 Minn. 266, 270, 251 N.W.2d 695, 697 (1977), overruled on other grounds by Downtown Dev. Project, Marshall City Council Resolution No. 57 v. City of Marshall, 281 N.W.2d 161, 163 n.3 (Minn. 1979). Therefore, we reverse the decision of the court of appeals and remand this case to the district court for further proceedings consistent with this opinion.In the ruling, Justice David Lillehaug wrote for the court that the right-of-way charges are taxes aimed at benefiting the public as a whole, and not fees issued in exchange for special benefits awarded to individual property owners. http://citizenery-mncourts.blogspot.comIf accidently email goes thro just delete.FURTHER;it is prudent to useJack Hoeschler, an attorney who has been representing two churches and Minnesota Public Radio in legal appeals filed in Ramsey County District Court, said he expects to file a parallel lawsuit on behalf of Krinkie and other commercial owners.St. Paul right-of-way fees are taxes, Minnesota high court rules
https://www.twincities.com › 2016/08/24 › st-paul-minnesota-right-of-way...Aug 24, 2016 - As a result, Lillehaug said, the charges are subject to a city's constitutional limits on taxing authority. ... “With today's Minnesota Supreme Court decision, the city has maintained its ability to collect assessments through its right-of-way program,” Clark said.xx
31stAug2019Fred I know your busy, Candidates.Lawyers,MediaWRATH OF GOD TURBULENCE OF NATURETRUMP4TRUTH SHARON4SAFETY,SANITY,SEXUALITYIn the interest of Public Policy, Citys Records based on Fraud,Deceptive Billings, triggers Anti Trust Issues.Snail Mail Ed smith should be fired Forensic Files of ClosedAffiant paid out over $2,000 in Assessments, to prevent ForclosureEvidence mandates Big Time Refunds. http://taxthemax.blogspot.comTo the Above named; Look at Mailing Address City website down.Did Mpls. buy out St. Paul, Haha 4.5%interestShow [10 \/] entriesSearch:[ ]
Current Permit / File
Status:Under ReviewPermit / File #:20 16 037125 EXT 00 CSPermit / File Type:CSO ComplaintSub Type:ExteriorWork Type:ComplaintIssued:2016-05-17Address:697 SURREY AVE ST PAULAdditional Information
ProcessesShow [10 \/] entriesSearch:[ ]
Process Details
Process NameDSI CS Complaint AdminAssigned UserCSOCOMPLBaseline Start Date:22-06-2016Baseline End Date22-06-2016StatusOpenSharon Anderson aka Scarrella 651-776-5835 sharon4anderson@aol.comLEGAL NOTICE: /s/Sharon4Anderson@aol.com ECF_P165913Pacersa1299 telfx: 651-776-5835:
Attorney ProSe_InFact,Private Attorney General QuiTam Whistleblower, www.taxthemax.blogspot.com
The Electronic Communications Privacy Act, 18 U.S.C.
Ch.119 Sections 2510-2521 et seq., governs distribution of this "Message,"
including attachments, may contain the originator's
proprietary information. The originator hereby notifies
recipients Message review, dissemination, copying, and content-based
actions. Authorized carriers of this message
shall expeditiously deliver this Message to intended recipients. See: Quon
v. Arch
Subscribe to: Posts (Atom)SharonSearch
TellMyPolitican
Sharons Memorys
SharonsStrictScrunity
Sharon4Mayor2010 2
SharonsSodaHead
The Political Animal
JudicialWatch2019
HonMr.LeinTrashWar9/11/19
MNAGKeithEllisonsConflicts2019
SharonsFiles
I’m also attaching our rate card if you would like to market your candidacy to our loyal readership. Now in our 53rd year, our newspaper group reaches every home on the West Side and all of the apartments and condos in downtown St. Paul. If you have any questions, please contact me or Tim at 651-457-1177.Thanks!AmyAmy JohnsonMedia and Marketing CoordinatorSt. Paul Voice, Downtown St. Paul Voice, South St. Paul Voice and La Voz LatinaTerms and Policies: www.stpaulpublishing.com/advertising.htmlSharon Anderson aka Scarrella 651-776-5835 sharon4anderson@aol.comLEGAL NOTICE: /s/Sharon4Anderson@aol.com ECF_P165913Pacersa1299 telfx: 651-776-5835:
Attorney ProSe_InFact,Private Attorney General QuiTam Whistleblower, www.taxthemax.blogspot.com
The Electronic Communications Privacy Act, 18 U.S.C.
Ch.119 Sections 2510-2521 et seq., governs distribution of this "Message,"
including attachments, may contain the originator's
proprietary information. The originator hereby notifies
recipients Message review, dissemination, copying, and content-based
actions. Authorized carriers of this message
shall expeditiously deliver this Message to intended recipients. See: Quon
v. Arch
