Sharon4CouncilWard2: CandidateWard2Sharon4AndersonreSt.PaulChamberCommerce2019

Thursday, March 14, 2019

CandidateWard2Sharon4AndersonreSt.PaulChamberCommerce2019

Wed.13Mar2019

To the Aboved Named, Council,County,Media

In the INTEREST of Fairness, All Candidates must be aware of the

Chambers Web Site,
Saint Paul

From: sharon4anderson@aol.com
To: Shannon@saintpaulchamber.com, sharon4anderson@aol.com
Sent: 3/13/2019 1:57:35 PM Central Standard Time
Subject: Re: Council Election Chamber 2019 Sharon Anderson 2014 repeat

City Election Candidates3/12/2019 3:51:27 PM Central Standard Time, Shannon@saintpaulchamber.com writes:

https://sharon4council.blogspot.com/2015/10/trustyouvote4sharon3nov2014thanks.html

Sharon Anderson

Name: Sharon Anderson
Public Office Sought: St.Paul Council Ward 2
Email: Sharon4Anderson@aol.com
Phone: 651-776-5835
Address: Legal Domicile 1058 Summit Ave,Mail 697 Surrey St. Paul,MN 55104-0384
Campaign Website:http://sharon4council.blogspot.com  ForensicFileshttp://sharon4anderson.org 100 Blogshttp://scribd.com/sharon-anderson-1091http://.slideshare.com/sharon4anderson

https://bloggin-bitch.blogspot.com/

Twitter Handle: http://twitter.com/sharon4anderson

Facebook Page: http://facebook.com/sharon4anderson

http://linkedin.com/pulse/sharons-blindness-denied-cannabis-sharon-anderson

1. Please provide a brief bio highlighting your experience and accomplishments  Affiant VA Widow has tracked City Hall 40 yrs, Self Taught, Blogger,Legal Research Analyst Candidate 4 MNAG RealEstate Entreprenuer http://sharon4mnag.blogspot.com

,Trust Worthy,High Morals,Soverign,Constitutionalist, Hometown, Homegrown, similarily situated with Homeowners, Seniors, Vunerable Persons, with thousands of pdf files,http://sharon4anderson.org

Grade School Eastern Heights, Marshall Jr. St.Paul Central.

Please include the headshot you would like included with your candidate profile.

1. Please provide a brief bio highlighting experience and accomplishments that qualify you to be the next City Council member in Saint Paul. (200 word maximum)

https://sharon4council.blogspot.com/2015/10/trustyouvote4sharon3nov2014thanks.html

Self taught Blogger Home Town, Homegrown Legal Research Analyst,tracking City Hall over 40 yrs.Similarily Situated Homeowners,Seniors,Disable and Vunerable who cannot Speak or Fight4themselves. Sharon must Educate the Public on Sharia Law, Influx of Muslins who take their Oath on the Quran,contrary to USA Constitution. Sharon Learned about Law and Computers. Exposing Government Misconduct re QuiTam Relator.

Business climate

2. How would you characterize the business climate in Saint Paul?

Poor - Government take over on our Trash,ShakeDown on Housing Issues re USSC 10-1032 titled Magner vs Gallagher Taxaction without Representation, Ponzi Taxing Scheme via Consent Agenda,Excessivre Inspections without Property Owners Consent, Illegal Fees, 4 1/2 % interest based on Fraud must not stand. Disparity.

http://justalandlord.com/2010/09/01/8th-circuit-court-of-appeals-rules-in-favor-of-landlords/. Most of the cases claimed RICO (racketeering) on the part of the city employees.https://www.nationalbcc.org/images/stories/DOJ-St-Paul.pdf

the City’s Housing Code enforcement temporarily, if not permanently, burdened Appellants’ rental businesses, which indirectly burdened their tenants.

3. What role do you think the City should have in attracting and retaining jobs, and what steps would you take to solicit new businesses to, and retain existing businesses in, Saint Paul?

When the City,County become Law Breakers, Breeds Contempt4Law Lower Taxes, Downsize.

4. Would you support hiring a business advocate as a member of the city senior staff, to concentrate on business retention and expansion; new business recruitment; and business impact of proposed regulations on the business climate in Saint Paul? NO

Perez may have exceeded the scope of the ethics and professional responsibility opinions he received from the Department and thereby violated his duties of loyalty and confidentiality to the United States. Perez also misled senior Justice Department officials about the quid pro quo when he misinformed then-Associate Attorney General Thomas Perrelli about the reasons for Magner’s withdrawal. The quid pro quo between the Department of Justice and the City of St. Paul, Minnesota, is largely the result of the machinations of one man: Assistant Attorney General Thomas Perez. Yet the consequences of his actions will negatively affect not only Fredrick Newell and the lowincome residents of St. Paul who he championed. The effects of this quid pro quo will be felt by future whistleblowers who act courageously, and often at great personal risk, to fight fraud and identify waste on behalf of federal taxpayers. The effects of withdrawing Magner will be felt by the minority tenants in St. Paul who, due to the case’s challenge to the City’s housing code, continue to live with rampant rodent infestations and inadequate plumbing. The effects of sacrificing Newell’s case will cost American taxpayers the opportunity to recover up to $200 million and allow St. Paul’s misdeeds to go unpunished. Far more troubling, however, is the fundamental damage that this quid pro quo has done to the rule of law in the United States and to the reputation of the Department of Justice as a fair and impartial arbiter of justice.

5. Do you support any other specific employment-related proposals in Saint Paul (such as mandatory scheduling notice)? If so, what specific steps would you take to understand the impact of an ordinance on the many types of businesses in Saint Paul and how would you define any exceptions to those policies?

Eliminate Excessive Consumption/Inspections/Abatement, without Valid Complaints,Warrants, Railroaded thro Council on Consent Agenda, Affiant and others

do not and did not Consent to this Ponzi Taxing,Fee, Scheme with 4%interest to Steal our Homestead

Propertys.

6. Would you support modifying or repealing the new earned sick and safe time or minimum wage ordinances that apply to the city? If so, how? Repeal

Public safety

7. What is your strategy to address public safety concerns?

Sharon duly Supports President Donald Trumps effort to Build the Wall, Immigration

Reform, if your not Legal, then Leave,

If the Laws are not Broken or Bended then don't fix it.

Budget

8. What are your priorities for the City’s budget?

Housing Trust, Homeless, Stop the Bloat, or Walk the Plank of Bankruptsy.

http://taxthemax.blogspot.com

9. How do you view the relationship between commercial and residential property taxes?

Unfair contrary to MN Constution Art X and Separation of Powers Art. III. https://bloggin-bitch.blogspot.com/ 100 Blogs Forensic Files Evidence.

10. What will you do to expand Saint Paul’s tax base?

Downsize and Abolish Property Taxes and RICO Assessments. Tax all Non Profits,Churchs etc. City has willfully Failed to Disclose Conflicts of interest. Lawyers in the Legislative and Executive Branchs at the same time, Council and Hennepin Co. Asst. Attorney, Nepatism Council Pres,

married to Parks and Rec shuffling Funds.

Workforce development

11. How will you work with K-12 and post-secondary educational institutions and businesses to ensure our region develops and retains an educated workforce?

PROMOTE Home Schooling, Sharon is Self Taught as others must also have the Passion,Prudence,and Patience to expose the Ponzi Taxing Scheme of City,County,State,

12. What do you see as the city council’s role with regard to public schools in Saint Paul?

None as the School Board. has Authority/Jurisdiction

Other

13. What is the biggest challenge facing the city and how would you address it?

Disparity in all Housing Matters, Taxes, RICO Acts by City Official must be abated, All e-mails and e commerce must be addressed. Use of out side Council burdensome to Taxpayers, or reduce the City Attorneys Office.



 The Department of Justice entered into a quid pro quo arrangement with the City of St. Paul, Minnesota, in which the Department agreed to decline intervention in United States ex rel. Newell v. City of St. Paul and United States ex rel. Ellis v. City of St. Paul et al. in exchange for the City withdrawing Magner v. Gallagher from the Supreme Court.  The quid pro quo was a direct result of Assistant Attorney General Perez’s successful efforts to pressure the Department of Housing and Urban Development, the U.S. Attorney’s Office in Minnesota, and the Civil Division within the Department of Justice to reconsider their support for Newell in the context of the proposal to withdraw Magner.  The initial development of the quid pro quo by senior political appointees, and the subsequent 180 degree change of position, confused and frustrated the career Department of Justice attorneys responsible for enforcing the False Claims Act, who described the situation as “weirdness,” “ridiculous,” and a case of “cover your head ping pong.”  The reasons given by the Department of Housing and Urban Development for recommending declination in Newell are unsupported by documentary evidence and instead appear to be pretextual post-hoc rationalizations for a purely political decision.  The “consensus” of the federal government to switch its recommendation and decline intervention in Newell was the direct result of Assistant Attorney General Perez manipulating the process and advising and overseeing the communications between the City of St. Paul, the Department of Housing and Urban Development, and the Civil Division within the Department of Justice.  Assistant Attorney General Perez was personally and directly involved in negotiating the mechanics of the quid pro quo with David Lillehaug and he personally agreed to the quid pro quo on behalf of the United States during a closed-door meeting with the Mayor in St. Paul.  Despite the Department of Justice’s contention that the intervention recommendation in Newell was a “close call” and “marginal,” contemporaneous documents show the Department believed that Newell alleged a “particularly egregious example of false certifications” and therefore the United States sacrificed strong allegations of false claims worth as much as $200 million to the Treasury.  Assistant Attorney General Perez offered to arrange for the Department of Housing and Urban Development to provide material to the City of St. Paul to assist the City in its motion to dismiss the Newell whistleblower complaint. This offer was inappropriate and potentially violated Perez’s duty of loyalty to his client, the United States.  Assistant Attorney General Perez attempted to cover up the quid pro quo when he personally instructed career attorneys to omit a discussion of Magner in the declination memos that outlined the reasons for the Department’s decision to decline intervention in Newell and Ellis, and focus instead only “on the merits.

14. What would be your top three priorities if elected?

Housing,Taxes-Fees-Assessments,Enforce MN Constitution Art.X and III Separation of Powers

15. What do you think should be the city’s top transportation related priority?

Quit Stealing our Cars,Trailers,Licenses via Bogus Excessive Resolutions,

Do not raise the Gas Tax, No more Light Rail until the Feds approve Funding.

16. Are there any services currently provided by the city that you believe should be cut back or eliminated? Or, are there new opportunities to share services with other entities?

Combine City and County Boards, Combine Sheriff and Police, Combine Depts Similar such as DSI and Health,

Eliminate Legislative Hearing Officer,Disclose and Have the DSI inspectors go straight

to Council with Valid Inspections under and signed off by the Mayor. and City Attorney, published on Legistar.

17. Is there anything else you would like to share with voters not covered above?

YES NO WAY SHOULD ANY PERSONS go thro Fighting the City,County and Courts

with Forensic Files, unabated. Affiant VA Widow going Blind, must forever via Love of

President Donald Trump and Country, Make Government Accountable by filing 4 Office

not to Win, but for to Set the Records Straight. Affiant has been reduced to Poverty, Takings of 13 Propertys without Just Compensations is Bizzare.

http://sharia4law.blogspot.com

Audit finds no evidence state child-care money funneled to terrorists: An audit of Minnesota's child-care assistance program has found no evidence to substantiate a former state worker's allegation that $100 million was lost to fraud, or that some of the money was funneled to terrorist organizations in Somalia. The report from the Office of Legislative Auditor — an independent arm of the Legislature — did conclude that the level of fraud in the $254 million Child Care Assistance Program is likely higher than the $5 million or $6 million that has been proven by prosecutors. Read the auditor's report here.

SharonvsJusticeGildeaQuidProQuo

Sun20Oct2019 TO THE ABOVE NAMED;SERVICE ELECTRONICALLY,EMAIL,SOCIAL MEDIA AND BLOGS CRIMINAL ALLEGATIONS RICO RE QUID PRO QUO NO FILING FEE4WHISTLEBLOWER ATTORNEY PRO SE PRIVATE ATTORNEY GENERAL RE QUITAM STATE OF MINNESOTA IN SUPREME COURT A19-0916Minnesota Judicial Branch - BioChief Justice Lorie Skjerven GildeaSupreme CourtSend an email via our contact formState Court Administrator's Office(651) 296-2474 (phone)(651) 297-5636 (fax)Minnesota Judicial Center (MJC) Suite #: 13525 Rev. Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. Blvd.St. Paul, MN 55155 Sharon Anderson Ward 2 QuiTam Relator White,Widow,WhistleblowerName: Sharon AndersonPublic Office Sought: Saint Paul City Council Email: Sharon4Anderson@aol.comPhone: 651-776-5835Website: sharon4council.blogspot.comTwitter Handle: @sharon4andersonFacebook: Sharon Anderson2019 Saint paul Voter Guide City St.Paul QuidProQuo unabated by Chief Justice Lorie Gildea QUESTIONS 1. Citys Trash/Garbarge Contract 11Nov2017 techinally must be voided, basedon Asst. City Attorney Rachael Tierney, Sarah Grewing, then and today giving legal Advise to past and present Council to Malign, usurp City Charter, triggeHouse Committee on Oversight and Government Reformrs Ineffective Assistance of City Council's Resolutions Ord 18-39 further Quid Pro Quo. VoteNo Save our Charter. 2. Has Chief Justice Lorie S.Gildea Covertly by Published Order indirectly,directlOPA190916-101619.pd pg 3 further over 6,000 signed signatures mandates Investigations over and above the 5Nov2019 Ballot and Elections. a. City Attorneys simulating legal process's for Citys Pecuniary Gain.? Cash Cow 4 Lawyers.Quid Pro QuoAlmanac - Twin Cities PBS .ATTY GENERAL ELLISON, ST PAUL TRASH FIGHT, DAYTON’S PORTRAITMN Attorney General Ellison, Hazelden’s Mark Mishek, Former Gov Dayton portrait More 3. Legal Notice re Separation of Powers, the Landlord Case and now Trash Casewithout MN Attorney General Mike Hatch,Lory Swanson and now Current MNAG Keith Ellison, intervention to Protect the State Laws, Constitution State and Federal as mentioned, 4. Has Justice Lorie Gildea in her Official Capacity looked the other way on other Lawsuits vs. City St. Paul, specifically USSC10-1032 Titled Magner vs. GallagherHouse Committee on Oversight and Government Reform The quid pro quo between the Department of Justice and the City of St. Paul, Minnesota, is largely the result of the machinations of one man: Assistant Attorney General Thomas Perez. Yet the consequences of his actions will negatively affect not only Fredrick Newell and the lowincome residents of St. Paul who he championed. The effects of this quid pro quo will be felt by future whistleblowers who act courageously, and often at great personal risk, to fight fraud and identify waste on behalf of federal taxpayers. The effects of withdrawing Magner will be felt by the minority tenants in St. Paul who, due to the case’s challenge to the City’s housing code, continue to live with rampant rodent infestations and inadequate plumbing. The effects of sacrificing Newell’s case will cost American taxpayers the opportunity to recover up to $200 million and allow St. Paul’s misdeeds to go unpunished. Far more troubling, however, is the fundamental damage that this quid pro quo has done to the rule of law in the United States and to the reputation of the Department of Justice as a fair and impartial arbiter of justice 5, Has Chief Justice Lorie Gildea overreached her Personal and Official Duties, re; Committment Panel is Cap knowing appointment of members ie Knutson,Gearin,Smith,Metzen,Asphaug, etal knowing Public Distaste,Distrust of these Judges b. 59 yr Restraining Orders, Restraint of Free Speech, by Gearin Ordering Web Sites taken down or Criminal Charges. BIZZARE. see Memorandum below. re Dede Evavald, Sharon Anderson re Concern Darlene Winters Trust Acct. Sandra Grazzini et alOpinions-Unpublished?Archives https://opinions-unpublished.blogspot.com/2013/Sharons-CourtRecords: In the Matter Darlene WinterPO62-14-696_HS1113StPaulAveElmer MackSocWorker postconviction court’s factual findings, not only does the majority depart from our precedent, but it also places Minnesota out of step with courts across the country. See, e.g., Bennett v. United States, 663 F.3d 71, 85 (2d Cir. 2011) (explaining that its deference to the findings made by district court in the course of deciding an ineffectiveness claim reflected “the superiority of the trial judge’s position to make determinations of credibility since only the trial judge can be aware of the variations in demeanor and tone of voice that bear so heavily on the listener’s understanding of and belief in what is said” (citation omitted) (internal quotation marked omitted)); Ahmed v. Redman, 782 F.2d 409, 412 (3d Cir. 1986) (explaining that the statutory presumption of correctness attaches to the subsidiary findings of historical fact that are relevant to the resolution of mixed questions of fact and law raised by a claim of ineffective assistance of counsel); United States v. Auerbach, 745 F.2d 1157, 1161 (8th Cir. 1984) (explaining that, “[w]e will affirm a district court’s finding that a habeas petitioner was denied effective assistance of counsel where the district court’s findings of fact which support the conclusion of law are not clearly erroneous”); Gaines v. Comm’r of Corr., 51 A.3d 948, 959-60, 966 (Conn. 2012) (explaining that the postconviction Complaints vs. Justice Lorie Gildea Lorie Skjerven Gildea - Wikipedia Because of Gildea's discrimination to favor women, the men have been left homeless, destroyed livelihoods, forced into squalor, and, most importantly, damaged their families. Gildea has condoned these smear campaigns that are OPA091641-0531.pdfused to prevent the men from speaking. postconviction court’s factual findings, not only does the majority depart from our precedent, but it also places Minnesota out of step with courts across the country. See, e.g., Bennett v. United States, 663 F.3d 71, 85 (2d Cir. 2011) (explaining that its deference to the findings made by district court in the course of deciding an ineffectiveness claim reflected “the superiority of the trial judge’s position to make determinations of credibility since only the trial judge can be aware of the variations in demeanor and tone of voice that bear so heavily on the listener’s understanding of and belief in what is said” (citation omitted) (internal quotation marked omitted)); Ahmed v. Redman, 782 F.2d 409, 412 (3d Cir. 1986) (explaining that the statutory presumption of correctness attaches to the subsidiary findings of historical fact that are relevant to the resolution of mixed questions of fact and law raised by a claim of ineffective assistance of counsel); United States v. Auerbach, 745 F.2d 1157, 1161 (8th Cir. 1984) (explaining that, “[w]e will affirm a district court’s finding that a habeas petitioner was denied effective assistance of counsel where the district court’s findings of fact which support the conclusion of law are not clearly erroneous”); Gaines v. Comm’r of Corr., 51 A.3d 948, 959-60, 966 (Conn. 2012) (explaining that the postconviction OPINIONS OF THESUPREME COURTFILED WEDNESDAY, OCTOBER 16, 2019NOTICE - MEDIA RELEASE TIME IS 10:00 A.M.A19-0916 Bruce Clark, et al., Respondents, vs. City of Saint Paul, et al., Appellants. Ramsey County. 1. A referendum on a Saint Paul ordinance that establishes organized waste collection services does not conflict with the requirements in Minn. Stat. §§ 115A.94–.941 (2018), that municipalities ensure that residents have waste collection services including through appropriate local controls, because ordinances that are not subject to the referendum fulfill those requirements and the Legislature intended that municipalities have broad authority in the process for establishing organized waste collection. 2. A referendum on an ordinance that establishes organized waste collection services in the City does not impair the City’s contract obligations under the Contract Clauses of the United States and Minnesota Constitutions. Affirmed. Chief Justice Lorie S. Gildea.OPA190916-101619.pdfA18-0121 Ambree Getz, Respondent, vs. Eila Kaarina Peace, et al., Appellants. Court of Appeals.Email Please note: your email will become part of the public record. Phone: 651-266-8560Fax: 651-266-8574Dai Thao, Ward 1 | Jane L. Prince, Ward 7 | Chris Tolbert, Ward 3 | Amy Brendmoen, Ward 5 and Council President | Kassim Busuri, Ward 6| Mitra Jalali Nelson, Ward 4 | Rebecca Noecker, Ward 2Coordinated Collection | Saint Paul, Minnesota City Attorney | Saint Paul, MinnesotaCoordinated Collection | Saint Paul, MinnesotaThis contract provides a solid base to transition the city to Coordinated Collection and meets the priorities that the Council laid out for the negotiating team. See Final Contract, Final Contract Exhibits, and First Amendment.52 Organizer Ramac Franklin OrganizePageRight-click here to select Foth Office Search | Saint Paul, Minnesota| Code of Ordinances | St. Paul, MN | Municode LibrarySec. 14.01. - Power to levy assessments.Sec. 14.01.1. - Preliminary assessment.Sec. 14.01.2. - Charge for services.Sec. 14.01.3. - Reassessment.Sec. 14.01.4. - Appeal.Sec. 14.01.5. - Trial.Sec. 14.01.6. - Collection.Sec. 14.02. - Special assessment—Alternative procedure.City of Saint Paul - Meeting of City Council on 10/23/2019 at 3:30 PMRES 19-186417Authorizing the City of Saint Paul to enter into an agreement with the Minnesota Department of Revenue for the collection of Local Sales, Use Tax, and a Lodging Tax.ResolutionAuthorizing the City of Saint Paul to enter into an agreement with the Minnesota Department of Revenue for the collection of Local Sales, Use Tax, and a Lodging Tax.Ord 19-67117OrdinanceAmending section 220.05 of the Legislative Code to set rates for base level garbage service to be effective January 1, 2020.Businesses | Minnesota Department of RevenueAlcoholic Beverage TaxCigarette and Tobacco TaxesCorporation Franchise TaxEnergy Production TaxesEnvironmental Taxes and FeesEstate TaxFiduciary TaxGambling TaxesInsurance TaxesMining and Mineral Taxes MinnesotaCare TaxesMortgage Registry and Deed TaxPartnership TaxPetroleum TaxProperty TaxesS Corporation TaxSales and Use TaxUnrelated Business Income TaxWithholding Taxxx DetailsReportsFile #:Ord 19-67 Version: 1Name:Type:OrdinanceStatus:Second ReadingIn control:City CouncilFinal action:Title:Amending section 220.05 of the Legislative Code to set rates for base level garbage service to be effective January 1, 2020.Sponsors:Amy BrendmoenHistory (1)TextPublic Comments (2) Add New Comment2 recordsGroupExportDate NameDistrictOpinionCommentAction10/17/2019 6:51 PMCandidateSharonAndersonAgainstPlease read http://sharons-fraudupdate.blogspot.comForensic Files http://sharon4anderson.orgViolation of Charter,Ballot Vote No now Rate Setting Ponzi Taxing Scheme10/17/2019 10:24 AMCandidateSharonAndersonAgainstFor years Council has set Rates for NonProfit District Heating, now setting Rates for Trash a for Profit Business creates Contract Impairment, contrary to Private Citizens to do Business http://taxthemax.blogspot.comtherefore creating a Monoply,AntiTrustxxIN RE: Vanessa Yolanda REW | FindLaw Thomas A. Gilligan, Jr., Murnane Brandt, Saint Paul, MN, for respondent. James Allen Bergstrom, Roseville, MN, pro se. Lori Swanson, Attorney General, Alan I. Gilbert, Solicitor General, Michael Everson, Assistant Attorney General, Saint Paul, MN, for amicus curiae Minnesota Attorney General MEMORANDUM JUSTICE LORIE GILDEA'S50yrRestraining Orders 2019 - The Provocateurhttp://theeprovocateur.blogspot.com/2019/theeprovocateur.blogspot.com › ...The Minnesota Supreme Court, led by Judge Lorie Gildea, has to twist itself into ..... granted David Rucki a fifty (50) year restraining order against Dede Evavold. Now What Sharons latest http://sharonvcitystpaul.blogspot.com and http://citizenery-mncourts.blogspot.com651) 291-5297 (CAP) is defined by Minn. Stat. § 253B.19. Panel One - Judge AsphaugPanel Two - Judge RancourtPanel Three – Judge TilsenMinnesota Judicial Branch - Clerk of Appellate Courts Fri.18Oct2019 Tracking Opinions via Justice Lori GildeaMinnesota Judicial Branch - Clerk of Appellate CourtsBlogItBabeSandraGrazzini-Rucki,Pauper,ChildSupportviaJusticeLorieGildeahttps://theeprovocateur.blogspot.com/2019/09/sandra-grazzini-rucki-pauper-who-should.ht Just a Note re Kathleen Gearin Tolbert served as a law clerk for Ramsey County Chief Judge Kathleen Gearin, and then became an assistant attorney for Hennepin County. Other experience includes serving on the League of Minnesota Cities Board ofhttps://www.slideshare.net/Sharon4Anderson/affidavit-prejudicejudge-kathleen-gearinhttps://www.documentcloud.org/documents/4417581-19AVCV171950Order03212018.html re Dede EvavaldThursday, September 26, 2019Sandra Grazzini-Rucki, A Pauper Who Should Pay Child SupportThe Provocateur: Sandra Grazzini-Rucki, A Pauper Who Should Pay Child Supporthttps://theeprovocateur.blogspot.com/2019/09/sandra-grazzini-rucki-pauper-who-should.html?fbclid=IwAR2jTKIsegFHNzLh-mS5anl14m5aNneGU2cgYPTpZREsNTcVSqxZhDF52pcSharon Anderson aka Scarrella 651-776-5835 sharon4anderson@aol.comhttp://blogitbabe.blogspot.com http://sharon4council.blogspot.comLEGAL NOTICE: /s/Sharon4Anderson@aol.com ECF_P165913Pacersa1299 telfx: 651-776-5835:Attorney ProSe_InFact,Private Attorney General QuiTam Whistleblower, www.taxthemax.blogspot.com The Electronic Communications Privacy Act, 18 U.S.C. Ch.119 Sections 2510-2521 et seq., governs distribution of this "Message," including attachments, may contain the originator'sproprietary information. The originator hereby notifiesrecipients Message review, dissemination, copying, and content-based actions. Authorized carriers of this message shall expeditiously deliver this Message to intended recipients. See: Quon v. Arch