Sunday, July 31, 2011

SharonAndersonWard2Vote_QuoWarranto

http://archive.leg.state.mn.us/docs/2011/other/110561/A11-1107_Petitioners_Response.pdf

Please track the above Quo Warranto 4 Minn. Budget Mess
LGA MN Miracle is not MN Malpractice
Vote Sharon Anderson Ward 2 St.Paul City Council

My Ballot

My Ballot Race Index

St. Paul City Council Ward 2

Comparison

Biographical Information

Web Site: www.sharon4anderson.org

Email: Sharon4Anderson@aol.com

Campaign Phone: 651-776-5835

City/Town: St.Paul

Occupation: Hobby Political Advocate, Prennial Candidate to Expose Courts Complicity with Council, City/County Attorneys

Education: School of Hard Knocks Grad St.Paul Central

Why are you seeking this office? www.sharon4anderson.org

www.sharon4council.blogspot.com http://forums.e-democracy.org/groups/stpaul-issues/files/f/1679-2007-08T193758Z/5Jul07RatAssLegal_22.pdf

Sharon Anderson: Implementing e-commerce4citizenery's "dueprocess" www.sharon4anderson.org www.sharon4council.blogspot.com www.taxthemax.blogspot.com http://forums.e-democracy.org/groups/stpaul-issues/files/f/1679-2007-07-08T193758Z/5Jul07RatAssLegal_22.pdf Seeking Office to expose the Ponzi Scheme of the Citys "takings" of Private Homestead and Commercial Propertys via Bogus Code Enforcement. 5th Amend "takings" Abolish the Legislative Hearing Officer quasi Judicial ie: Marcia Moermond as Simulating Legal Process's complicity with the Mayors DSI Employees.
2. Budget_Duplication and Delegation of Jurisdiction/Authority, Eliminate Legislative Hearing Officer as its grown out of Control. The City mushttp://www.angelfire.com/planet/andersonadvocates/PDFedem2006/file4.pdf a. Sharon is Sick of Government of,by,4, Lawyers bleeding the Public techinally exploiting the Seniors,Disabled,Vunerable Scare Tactics.

http://www.angelfire.com/planet/andersonadvocates/PDFedem2006/file4.pdf

What do you consider to be the most pressing problem(s) facing St. Paul?

http://www.angelfire.com/mn3/andersonadvocates/2006water/PDFcases/sharoncases.pdf

Sharon Anderson: Citys Complicity with DSI vs. Citizenery to Harass via Bogus Code Compliance re: Paula Seeley and Joel Essling are out of Control. Excessive Consumption without Long Form Complaints mandate Abolish DSI in its Entiretiry. City's Ponzi Scheme Disparate Impact_Treatment evicting Tenants who Trash Propertys, then Condemning_Demo or Selling to their Friends for Low Sale's. Kathy Lantry's Larceny to appoint_Delegating the City Authority/Jurisdiction to Marcia Mormand Legislative hearing Officer to the demise of the Homeowner's specifically Elderly Women,Disabled, for the Citys Pecuniary Greed. To issue Forgivable Loans must estopp. Currently 1,400 vacant buildings CashCow Loss TaxBase is contrary to Public Policy, http://www.angelfire.com/mn3/andersonadvocates/2006water/PDFcases/sharoncases.pdf

What policies would you promote to address cuts in state aid, i.e. LGA?

Sharon Anderson: The City must learn to Budget, Tighten its Belt and Stop Spending Humpty Dumpty Sat on the Central Rail Corridor, "5th Amend. "taking" creating a Great FALL. http://www.angelfire.com/planet/andersonadvocates/PDFedem2006/file4.pdf a. Sharon is Sick of Government of,by,4, Lawyers bleeding the Public techinally exploiting the Seniors,Disabled,Vunerable Scare Tactics. b. Eliminate Local Government Aid or distribute equally as needed to prevent Hardships.
c. Combine Police,Fire with Sheriff have 1 dept, Eliminate all City and County Attorneys, in all 87 Countys, Have 10 District Attorneys answerable to the www.ag.state.mn.us and not to the Judges.
FURTHER AFFIANT SAYETH NOT AT THIS TIME EXCEPT SHARON IS SEEKING IMPEACHMENTS and to Abolish TaxCourt,OAH Executive Branch SCAP PANEL WHICH JUDGE GEARIN AND JUDGE JOANNE SMITH CHAIR. www.lufsky.blogspot.com,

I am running for City Council because I believe that the residents and business owners of Ward 2 deserve an engaged, passionate voice in the city council chambers. I believe that the best representatives do not sit back and wait for someone to come to them. They walk every street, talking with the people that live and work there, listening to their stories and asking for their input. Then they take that knowledge and carry it into city hall, making sure those voices are heard in every meeting, planning process and decision.

I am running to bring a new style of leadership to city hall: based on responsiveness and the active cultivation of citizen problem-solvers. My vision for Saint Paul is one in which every single resident is engaged in making the city a better place to live.

By running with the Green Party I also hope to build a stronger voice for progressive issues in city politics, and ranked choice voting will allow citizens to vote for those candidates without any fear.

Jim Ivey: 1) The lack of support for small, locally-owned businesses. City development and planning decisions continue to be focused on luring large one-time investments, instead of building a sustainable economy that attracts and recirculates revenue within Saint Paul.

2) The lack of affordable, healthy food for neighborhoods. Saint Paul has a number of "food deserts", and we should be rebuilding our local food infrastructure. That includes devoting unused greenspace to urban agriculture, investing in local food processing resources, and creating a city-wide food distribution network through existing stores and additional co-ops/markets.

3) The lack of support for district councils and neighborhood community groups. District councils serve a critical role in St. Paul neighborhoods, but they are underfunded and ignored by their elected representatives. They need the resources required to attract and retain excellent staff, and a stronger voice representing them at the city council.

Jim Ivey: My primary focus would be to strengthen the local economy with a city-wide plan to invest in infrastructure and services that benefit small, locally-owned businesses. Numerous studies have shown that those types of businesses create a much larger return-on-investment, creating living-wage jobs for local residents and keeping retail and commercial dollars in the local economy.

Saint Paul also has a unique role in Minnesota of providing land and infrastructure for state and county government. Because this property is tax exempt, it reduces the overall tax base of the city and shifts the burden to local businesses and residents. If the state is going to continue taking significant tax revenue from the city of Saint Paul, but will no longer return it in the form of local government aid, then I think we should take another look at that relationship and find ways for Saint Paul to be directly compensated for that loss in potential property tax revenue.

Web Site: iveyforsaintpaul.org

Email: jim@iveyforsaintpaul.org

Campaign Phone: 651-665-0224

City/Town: Saint Paul

Occupation: Business Owner / Software Developer

Education: Purdue University - B.S. in Computer Science

Cynthia Schanno: I am running for City Council because I believe it is in the City best interest to vote in change, to include, new representation who will offer a fresh approach when addressing the issues faced by Saint Paul. As one who believes elected officials are “civil servants” of the people, our current council appears to be more interested in political aspirations and retirement plans than they are in the long-term stability of Saint Paul. As a city, we can no longer afford this type of self serving governing and I believe on behalf of the citizens of Saint Paul, it is time our elected official put the city and the citizen of Saint Paul first by first. Our city’s current economic challenges and deteriorating services where created by the decisions made by current council members; it is time for change, it is time for new representation, and it is time for a new direction for Saint Paul.

Cynthia Schanno: I see one of the most pressing issues for the citizens of Ward 2 is the continued loss of property values, while real estate taxes continue to rise. As a representative of Ward 2 I will advocate for an immediate freeze on real estate taxes and I would advocate for an aggressive economic business development plan to fill vacate building and commercial space throughout the ward.

Cynthia Schanno: To offset the loss of LGA the priority should be to prioritize, reduce spending, eliminate waste, and NOT raise taxes. To accomplish this the City must adjust its spending as both businesses and individuals have already done in recent years. To achieve the most impact in the quickest amount of time with the least amount of dollars spent, the following items should be implemented and including: - A citywide audit to identify expensed that can be eliminated and/or dramatically reduced in the area of redundant services, discretionary spending, inefficient programs, and wasteful spending. Until this effort is completed, a citywide spending freeze should be implemented. - Consolidate, privatize, and eliminating overlapping and non-essential services. - Implement a minimum two year pay freeze for current city employees and contractors. - Amend ALL pay and benefit packages for current, retired, and new hires.

Web Site: www.voteschanno.com

Email: cynthia@voteschanno

Campaign Phone: 651-261-6634

City/Town: Saint Paul

Occupation: Self Employeed

Education: Inver Hills CC - Account St Thomas College - Business Admin

Dave Thune: The candidate did not submit a response.

SharonvsJusticeGildeaQuidProQuo

Sun20Oct2019 TO THE ABOVE NAMED;SERVICE ELECTRONICALLY,EMAIL,SOCIAL MEDIA AND BLOGS CRIMINAL ALLEGATIONS RICO RE QUID PRO QUO NO FILING FEE4WHISTLEBLOWER ATTORNEY PRO SE PRIVATE ATTORNEY GENERAL RE QUITAM STATE OF MINNESOTA IN SUPREME COURT A19-0916Minnesota Judicial Branch - BioChief Justice Lorie Skjerven GildeaSupreme CourtSend an email via our contact formState Court Administrator's Office(651) 296-2474 (phone)(651) 297-5636 (fax)Minnesota Judicial Center (MJC) Suite #: 13525 Rev. Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. Blvd.St. Paul, MN 55155 Sharon Anderson Ward 2 QuiTam Relator White,Widow,WhistleblowerName: Sharon AndersonPublic Office Sought: Saint Paul City Council Email: Sharon4Anderson@aol.comPhone: 651-776-5835Website: sharon4council.blogspot.comTwitter Handle: @sharon4andersonFacebook: Sharon Anderson2019 Saint paul Voter Guide City St.Paul QuidProQuo unabated by Chief Justice Lorie Gildea QUESTIONS 1. Citys Trash/Garbarge Contract 11Nov2017 techinally must be voided, basedon Asst. City Attorney Rachael Tierney, Sarah Grewing, then and today giving legal Advise to past and present Council to Malign, usurp City Charter, triggeHouse Committee on Oversight and Government Reformrs Ineffective Assistance of City Council's Resolutions Ord 18-39 further Quid Pro Quo. VoteNo Save our Charter. 2. Has Chief Justice Lorie S.Gildea Covertly by Published Order indirectly,directlOPA190916-101619.pd pg 3 further over 6,000 signed signatures mandates Investigations over and above the 5Nov2019 Ballot and Elections. a. City Attorneys simulating legal process's for Citys Pecuniary Gain.? Cash Cow 4 Lawyers.Quid Pro QuoAlmanac - Twin Cities PBS .ATTY GENERAL ELLISON, ST PAUL TRASH FIGHT, DAYTON’S PORTRAITMN Attorney General Ellison, Hazelden’s Mark Mishek, Former Gov Dayton portrait More 3. Legal Notice re Separation of Powers, the Landlord Case and now Trash Casewithout MN Attorney General Mike Hatch,Lory Swanson and now Current MNAG Keith Ellison, intervention to Protect the State Laws, Constitution State and Federal as mentioned, 4. Has Justice Lorie Gildea in her Official Capacity looked the other way on other Lawsuits vs. City St. Paul, specifically USSC10-1032 Titled Magner vs. GallagherHouse Committee on Oversight and Government Reform The quid pro quo between the Department of Justice and the City of St. Paul, Minnesota, is largely the result of the machinations of one man: Assistant Attorney General Thomas Perez. Yet the consequences of his actions will negatively affect not only Fredrick Newell and the lowincome residents of St. Paul who he championed. The effects of this quid pro quo will be felt by future whistleblowers who act courageously, and often at great personal risk, to fight fraud and identify waste on behalf of federal taxpayers. The effects of withdrawing Magner will be felt by the minority tenants in St. Paul who, due to the case’s challenge to the City’s housing code, continue to live with rampant rodent infestations and inadequate plumbing. The effects of sacrificing Newell’s case will cost American taxpayers the opportunity to recover up to $200 million and allow St. Paul’s misdeeds to go unpunished. Far more troubling, however, is the fundamental damage that this quid pro quo has done to the rule of law in the United States and to the reputation of the Department of Justice as a fair and impartial arbiter of justice 5, Has Chief Justice Lorie Gildea overreached her Personal and Official Duties, re; Committment Panel is Cap knowing appointment of members ie Knutson,Gearin,Smith,Metzen,Asphaug, etal knowing Public Distaste,Distrust of these Judges b. 59 yr Restraining Orders, Restraint of Free Speech, by Gearin Ordering Web Sites taken down or Criminal Charges. BIZZARE. see Memorandum below. re Dede Evavald, Sharon Anderson re Concern Darlene Winters Trust Acct. Sandra Grazzini et alOpinions-Unpublished?Archives https://opinions-unpublished.blogspot.com/2013/Sharons-CourtRecords: In the Matter Darlene WinterPO62-14-696_HS1113StPaulAveElmer MackSocWorker postconviction court’s factual findings, not only does the majority depart from our precedent, but it also places Minnesota out of step with courts across the country. See, e.g., Bennett v. United States, 663 F.3d 71, 85 (2d Cir. 2011) (explaining that its deference to the findings made by district court in the course of deciding an ineffectiveness claim reflected “the superiority of the trial judge’s position to make determinations of credibility since only the trial judge can be aware of the variations in demeanor and tone of voice that bear so heavily on the listener’s understanding of and belief in what is said” (citation omitted) (internal quotation marked omitted)); Ahmed v. Redman, 782 F.2d 409, 412 (3d Cir. 1986) (explaining that the statutory presumption of correctness attaches to the subsidiary findings of historical fact that are relevant to the resolution of mixed questions of fact and law raised by a claim of ineffective assistance of counsel); United States v. Auerbach, 745 F.2d 1157, 1161 (8th Cir. 1984) (explaining that, “[w]e will affirm a district court’s finding that a habeas petitioner was denied effective assistance of counsel where the district court’s findings of fact which support the conclusion of law are not clearly erroneous”); Gaines v. Comm’r of Corr., 51 A.3d 948, 959-60, 966 (Conn. 2012) (explaining that the postconviction Complaints vs. Justice Lorie Gildea Lorie Skjerven Gildea - Wikipedia Because of Gildea's discrimination to favor women, the men have been left homeless, destroyed livelihoods, forced into squalor, and, most importantly, damaged their families. Gildea has condoned these smear campaigns that are OPA091641-0531.pdfused to prevent the men from speaking. postconviction court’s factual findings, not only does the majority depart from our precedent, but it also places Minnesota out of step with courts across the country. See, e.g., Bennett v. United States, 663 F.3d 71, 85 (2d Cir. 2011) (explaining that its deference to the findings made by district court in the course of deciding an ineffectiveness claim reflected “the superiority of the trial judge’s position to make determinations of credibility since only the trial judge can be aware of the variations in demeanor and tone of voice that bear so heavily on the listener’s understanding of and belief in what is said” (citation omitted) (internal quotation marked omitted)); Ahmed v. Redman, 782 F.2d 409, 412 (3d Cir. 1986) (explaining that the statutory presumption of correctness attaches to the subsidiary findings of historical fact that are relevant to the resolution of mixed questions of fact and law raised by a claim of ineffective assistance of counsel); United States v. Auerbach, 745 F.2d 1157, 1161 (8th Cir. 1984) (explaining that, “[w]e will affirm a district court’s finding that a habeas petitioner was denied effective assistance of counsel where the district court’s findings of fact which support the conclusion of law are not clearly erroneous”); Gaines v. Comm’r of Corr., 51 A.3d 948, 959-60, 966 (Conn. 2012) (explaining that the postconviction OPINIONS OF THESUPREME COURTFILED WEDNESDAY, OCTOBER 16, 2019NOTICE - MEDIA RELEASE TIME IS 10:00 A.M.A19-0916 Bruce Clark, et al., Respondents, vs. City of Saint Paul, et al., Appellants. Ramsey County. 1. A referendum on a Saint Paul ordinance that establishes organized waste collection services does not conflict with the requirements in Minn. Stat. §§ 115A.94–.941 (2018), that municipalities ensure that residents have waste collection services including through appropriate local controls, because ordinances that are not subject to the referendum fulfill those requirements and the Legislature intended that municipalities have broad authority in the process for establishing organized waste collection. 2. A referendum on an ordinance that establishes organized waste collection services in the City does not impair the City’s contract obligations under the Contract Clauses of the United States and Minnesota Constitutions. Affirmed. Chief Justice Lorie S. Gildea.OPA190916-101619.pdfA18-0121 Ambree Getz, Respondent, vs. Eila Kaarina Peace, et al., Appellants. Court of Appeals.Email Please note: your email will become part of the public record. Phone: 651-266-8560Fax: 651-266-8574Dai Thao, Ward 1 | Jane L. Prince, Ward 7 | Chris Tolbert, Ward 3 | Amy Brendmoen, Ward 5 and Council President | Kassim Busuri, Ward 6| Mitra Jalali Nelson, Ward 4 | Rebecca Noecker, Ward 2Coordinated Collection | Saint Paul, Minnesota City Attorney | Saint Paul, MinnesotaCoordinated Collection | Saint Paul, MinnesotaThis contract provides a solid base to transition the city to Coordinated Collection and meets the priorities that the Council laid out for the negotiating team. See Final Contract, Final Contract Exhibits, and First Amendment.52 Organizer Ramac Franklin OrganizePageRight-click here to select Foth Office Search | Saint Paul, Minnesota| Code of Ordinances | St. Paul, MN | Municode LibrarySec. 14.01. - Power to levy assessments.Sec. 14.01.1. - Preliminary assessment.Sec. 14.01.2. - Charge for services.Sec. 14.01.3. - Reassessment.Sec. 14.01.4. - Appeal.Sec. 14.01.5. - Trial.Sec. 14.01.6. - Collection.Sec. 14.02. - Special assessment—Alternative procedure.City of Saint Paul - Meeting of City Council on 10/23/2019 at 3:30 PMRES 19-186417Authorizing the City of Saint Paul to enter into an agreement with the Minnesota Department of Revenue for the collection of Local Sales, Use Tax, and a Lodging Tax.ResolutionAuthorizing the City of Saint Paul to enter into an agreement with the Minnesota Department of Revenue for the collection of Local Sales, Use Tax, and a Lodging Tax.Ord 19-67117OrdinanceAmending section 220.05 of the Legislative Code to set rates for base level garbage service to be effective January 1, 2020.Businesses | Minnesota Department of RevenueAlcoholic Beverage TaxCigarette and Tobacco TaxesCorporation Franchise TaxEnergy Production TaxesEnvironmental Taxes and FeesEstate TaxFiduciary TaxGambling TaxesInsurance TaxesMining and Mineral Taxes MinnesotaCare TaxesMortgage Registry and Deed TaxPartnership TaxPetroleum TaxProperty TaxesS Corporation TaxSales and Use TaxUnrelated Business Income TaxWithholding Taxxx DetailsReportsFile #:Ord 19-67 Version: 1Name:Type:OrdinanceStatus:Second ReadingIn control:City CouncilFinal action:Title:Amending section 220.05 of the Legislative Code to set rates for base level garbage service to be effective January 1, 2020.Sponsors:Amy BrendmoenHistory (1)TextPublic Comments (2) Add New Comment2 recordsGroupExportDate NameDistrictOpinionCommentAction10/17/2019 6:51 PMCandidateSharonAndersonAgainstPlease read http://sharons-fraudupdate.blogspot.comForensic Files http://sharon4anderson.orgViolation of Charter,Ballot Vote No now Rate Setting Ponzi Taxing Scheme10/17/2019 10:24 AMCandidateSharonAndersonAgainstFor years Council has set Rates for NonProfit District Heating, now setting Rates for Trash a for Profit Business creates Contract Impairment, contrary to Private Citizens to do Business http://taxthemax.blogspot.comtherefore creating a Monoply,AntiTrustxxIN RE: Vanessa Yolanda REW | FindLaw Thomas A. Gilligan, Jr., Murnane Brandt, Saint Paul, MN, for respondent. James Allen Bergstrom, Roseville, MN, pro se. Lori Swanson, Attorney General, Alan I. Gilbert, Solicitor General, Michael Everson, Assistant Attorney General, Saint Paul, MN, for amicus curiae Minnesota Attorney General MEMORANDUM JUSTICE LORIE GILDEA'S50yrRestraining Orders 2019 - The Provocateurhttp://theeprovocateur.blogspot.com/2019/theeprovocateur.blogspot.com › ...The Minnesota Supreme Court, led by Judge Lorie Gildea, has to twist itself into ..... granted David Rucki a fifty (50) year restraining order against Dede Evavold. Now What Sharons latest http://sharonvcitystpaul.blogspot.com and http://citizenery-mncourts.blogspot.com651) 291-5297 (CAP) is defined by Minn. Stat. § 253B.19. Panel One - Judge AsphaugPanel Two - Judge RancourtPanel Three – Judge TilsenMinnesota Judicial Branch - Clerk of Appellate Courts Fri.18Oct2019 Tracking Opinions via Justice Lori GildeaMinnesota Judicial Branch - Clerk of Appellate CourtsBlogItBabeSandraGrazzini-Rucki,Pauper,ChildSupportviaJusticeLorieGildeahttps://theeprovocateur.blogspot.com/2019/09/sandra-grazzini-rucki-pauper-who-should.ht Just a Note re Kathleen Gearin Tolbert served as a law clerk for Ramsey County Chief Judge Kathleen Gearin, and then became an assistant attorney for Hennepin County. Other experience includes serving on the League of Minnesota Cities Board ofhttps://www.slideshare.net/Sharon4Anderson/affidavit-prejudicejudge-kathleen-gearinhttps://www.documentcloud.org/documents/4417581-19AVCV171950Order03212018.html re Dede EvavaldThursday, September 26, 2019Sandra Grazzini-Rucki, A Pauper Who Should Pay Child SupportThe Provocateur: Sandra Grazzini-Rucki, A Pauper Who Should Pay Child Supporthttps://theeprovocateur.blogspot.com/2019/09/sandra-grazzini-rucki-pauper-who-should.html?fbclid=IwAR2jTKIsegFHNzLh-mS5anl14m5aNneGU2cgYPTpZREsNTcVSqxZhDF52pcSharon Anderson aka Scarrella 651-776-5835 sharon4anderson@aol.comhttp://blogitbabe.blogspot.com http://sharon4council.blogspot.comLEGAL NOTICE: /s/Sharon4Anderson@aol.com ECF_P165913Pacersa1299 telfx: 651-776-5835:Attorney ProSe_InFact,Private Attorney General QuiTam Whistleblower, www.taxthemax.blogspot.com The Electronic Communications Privacy Act, 18 U.S.C. Ch.119 Sections 2510-2521 et seq., governs distribution of this "Message," including attachments, may contain the originator'sproprietary information. The originator hereby notifiesrecipients Message review, dissemination, copying, and content-based actions. Authorized carriers of this message shall expeditiously deliver this Message to intended recipients. See: Quon v. Arch

Sunday, July 31, 2011

SharonAndersonWard2Vote_QuoWarranto

My Ballot

St. Paul City Council Ward 2

Get Started