City of Saint Paul - File #: Ord 12-59
O MY GOD LOOK AT THE SALARYS OF ST. PAUL CITY EMPLOYEES
MAGNER WHO LIVES IN STILLWATER BLEEDING THE CITY AT $139.974 Salary and Fringe
File #: Ord 12-59 Version: 1 Name: Vacant Building Registration Fees
Type: Ordinance Status: Agenda Ready
In control: City Council
Final action:
Title: Amending Chapter 43 of the Saint Paul Legislative Code to increase the City's annual vacant building registration fee from one thousand one hundred dollars ($1,100) to one thousand four hundred forty dollars ($1,440).
Sponsors: Kathy Lantry
Attachments: 07102012 Memo from Greg with Justification.pdf
Sunday, September 23, 2012
Friday, August 24, 2012
LawlessAmerica_BillWindsor_BillDahn_SharonAnderson_LennieAnderson_CarolBerg et al
Aug.19th http://www.lawlessamerica.com/ at Lennie Anderson Property witness Bill Windson_ Carol Berg_BillDahn http://www.billdahn.blogspot.com/ SharonAnderson Current Candidate MNSenate64 http://www.sharonsenate64.blogspot.com/ http://www.sharons-mn-id.blogspot.com/
Tim Klatke MN State Capitol 19Aug.2012_1058Summit Takings NO Compensation?
Fri24Aug2012 Legal Notice via ReplyVOTE NOV.6TH,2012 FIGHT4OURFAMILYS.Click here: (88) Lawless America Current Candidate _Senate64
www.sharonsenate64.blogspot.com www.facebook.com/sharon4anderson
www.twitter.com/sharon4anderson
www.sharon4anderson.org
LEGAL NOTICE: /s/Sharon4Anderson@aol.com ECF_P165913Pacersa1299 telfx: 651-776-5835: HEALTHCARE http://sharon4anderson.wordpress.com/2012/04/14/judicial-corruption-Sharon Anderson Tim Thanks www.sharonvaitkin.blogspot.com Aitkin Corruption is relevant. Keep up the Great Work
Wednesday, August 8, 2012
LennyAnderson_CarolBerg_LawlessAmerica
Click
here: lenny anderson carol berg vs. city st.paul - Google S
Lenny Anderson, Carol Berg
Lenny Anderson’s backyard
Lenny Anderson, Carol Berg
It's hard to know when things went wrong at Lenny Anderson's home on McKnight
Road in St. Paul.
The 70-year-old was storing a friend's camper, boat, water scooter and other items in his heavily wooded backyard when someone complained. The city got involved, and after a year of bickering, 10 Dumpsters and a recycling truck's worth of Anderson's and his friend's belongings were hauled out last week, bound for the landfill.
Anderson asserts the city overreacted; the city says it had to take whatever actions were necessary to clean up the property because of Anderson's continued violation of city ordinance.
"I feel very violated," said Anderson, who had a similar run-in with the city about a decade earlier. "They could've taken [some of the belongings] to the impound lot. They're inflexible."
After two complaints, the city inspected Anderson's land in April 2009 and asked him to clean it up. Anderson challenged the complaint, and appealed his case from the city level up to the state Supreme Court, which refused to hear it.
Things came to a head nearly a year -- and several warnings -- later when Anderson failed to meet the city's deadline, and the city decided it had to take matters into its own hands.
"He had his chance to remove it to somewhere compliant, and he failed to do so," said Angie Wiese, spokeswoman for the city's Department of Safety and Inspection. "The order [to clean up the property] says we will remove [items] from your property, not we will remove it and give it back to you later."
After exhausting his appeals, Anderson began clearing six large shipping containers, wood and steel beams from his backyard, which is not visible from the road. He asked for more time in July. The city agreed, but reinspections on Aug. 3 and Aug. 16 didn't show enough improvement, according to court documents.
The city sent Anderson a letter on Aug. 20, announcing its intention to "remove all items found not to be in compliance" on Sept. 8.
When the cleanup crew showed up, it was the manner of removal that agitated Anderson. He watched in horror as an excavator smashed, grabbed and dropped a boat, water scooter, camper, several metal trailers and other belongings into large Dumpsters.
Anderson and his attorney, James Roban, said it was the destruction and disposal of perfectly functional belongings that was unnecessarily malicious. They said that although they expected the cleanup crew, they didn't know so much property would be thrown away.
The city also discarded seemingly innocuous items, Anderson said, including a cast iron planter in his front yard that contained perennials, a park bench in the woods behind his home, $3,500 in firewood, a garden hose, and a large garbage can full of sand and salt for the winter.
Wiese said the only things the city impounds are titled, functioning vehicles. A truck was impounded and later reclaimed by Anderson.
"He had an opportunity to remove [his property] as he wanted," she said.
Anderson and the city went through a similar incident in 1999 involving some of the same items. The city hauled away some items that Anderson later reclaimed. The city billed him $25,000 for that job. It has estimated the most recent one at $30,000.
related content
The 70-year-old was storing a friend's camper, boat, water scooter and other items in his heavily wooded backyard when someone complained. The city got involved, and after a year of bickering, 10 Dumpsters and a recycling truck's worth of Anderson's and his friend's belongings were hauled out last week, bound for the landfill.
Anderson asserts the city overreacted; the city says it had to take whatever actions were necessary to clean up the property because of Anderson's continued violation of city ordinance.
"I feel very violated," said Anderson, who had a similar run-in with the city about a decade earlier. "They could've taken [some of the belongings] to the impound lot. They're inflexible."
After two complaints, the city inspected Anderson's land in April 2009 and asked him to clean it up. Anderson challenged the complaint, and appealed his case from the city level up to the state Supreme Court, which refused to hear it.
Things came to a head nearly a year -- and several warnings -- later when Anderson failed to meet the city's deadline, and the city decided it had to take matters into its own hands.
"He had his chance to remove it to somewhere compliant, and he failed to do so," said Angie Wiese, spokeswoman for the city's Department of Safety and Inspection. "The order [to clean up the property] says we will remove [items] from your property, not we will remove it and give it back to you later."
After exhausting his appeals, Anderson began clearing six large shipping containers, wood and steel beams from his backyard, which is not visible from the road. He asked for more time in July. The city agreed, but reinspections on Aug. 3 and Aug. 16 didn't show enough improvement, according to court documents.
The city sent Anderson a letter on Aug. 20, announcing its intention to "remove all items found not to be in compliance" on Sept. 8.
When the cleanup crew showed up, it was the manner of removal that agitated Anderson. He watched in horror as an excavator smashed, grabbed and dropped a boat, water scooter, camper, several metal trailers and other belongings into large Dumpsters.
Anderson and his attorney, James Roban, said it was the destruction and disposal of perfectly functional belongings that was unnecessarily malicious. They said that although they expected the cleanup crew, they didn't know so much property would be thrown away.
The city also discarded seemingly innocuous items, Anderson said, including a cast iron planter in his front yard that contained perennials, a park bench in the woods behind his home, $3,500 in firewood, a garden hose, and a large garbage can full of sand and salt for the winter.
Wiese said the only things the city impounds are titled, functioning vehicles. A truck was impounded and later reclaimed by Anderson.
"He had an opportunity to remove [his property] as he wanted," she said.
Anderson and the city went through a similar incident in 1999 involving some of the same items. The city hauled away some items that Anderson later reclaimed. The city billed him $25,000 for that job. It has estimated the most recent one at $30,000.
Anderson said he plans to sue the city for damages. He estimates his loss at
$75,000 to $100,000.
"It says they can remove things," Roban said. "It doesn't say they can destroy anything. I don't think it's reasonable to destroy everything."
Chao Xiong • 612-270-4708
"It says they can remove things," Roban said. "It doesn't say they can destroy anything. I don't think it's reasonable to destroy everything."
Chao Xiong • 612-270-4708
Monday, May 14, 2012
Thursday, November 24, 2011
MITCH ALBOM'S HAVE A LITTLE FAITH - Christian Movie Review
MITCH ALBOM'S HAVE A LITTLE FAITH - Christian Movie Review
Have a Great ThanksGiving Day Beautiful Day
Have a Great ThanksGiving Day Beautiful Day
Monday, November 21, 2011
In St. Paul, home values down but property tax increases are all over the map - TwinCities.com
In St. Paul, home values down but property tax increases are all over the map - TwinCities.com
Sharon Anderson · St. Paul Central
LEGAL NOTICE: /s/Sharon4Anderson@aol.com ECF_P165913Pacersa1299 telfx: 651-776-5835:
Attorney ProSe_InFact,Private Attorney General QuiTam Whistleblower, www.taxthemax.blogspot.com
The Electronic Communications Privacy Act, 18 U.S.C.
Ch.119 Sections 2510-2521 et seq., governs distribution of this "Message,"
including attachments, may contain the originator's
proprietary information. The originator hereby notifies
recipients Message review, dissemination, copying, and content-based
actions. Authorized carriers of this message
shall expeditiously deliver this Message to intended recipients. See: Quon
v. Arch. IMPORTANT DISCLAIMER
This site is for educational purposes only, dedicated to promoting political speech protected by the First Amendment. As you can imagine, we receive thousands of stories and requests for input from consumers all across the country. Given the sheer volume, we cannot respond to all inquiries. This site is dedicated to serving and protecting homeowners and restoring the integrity of our court systems. This site is for educational purposes only. The purposes of this website is to share information and knowledge and to advance fundamental Constitutional rights especially the First Amendment.
In St. Paul, home values down but property tax increases are all over the map
Updated: 11/20/2011 11:49:02 PM CST
If your home's market value slips, your property taxes go down accordingly, right?
In a word: no.
Homeowners in 10 of St. Paul's 17 planning districts will, on average, see their property taxes rise next year even though their home values are going down.
With home values sliding at different rates in different neighborhoods, some homeowners will be asked to cough up more money than ever, while others will get some tax relief.
The trend is exacerbated by the fact that cash-strapped municipalities are increasing tax levies to make up for cuts in state aid. Taxes are going up overall, though not for everybody.
Here's a third major factor: A new instant credit of sorts allows owners of lower-valued homes to reduce their taxable value by up to $30,000 when calculating taxes. That exclusion is no longer paid for by the state, and cities will have to shift tax burdens from shabbier homes to finer ones to reap the same money.
For instance, in the Merriam Park/Snelling/Lexington/Hamline district, where homes have held their value relatively well, a homeowner with a median-value home will pay 9.1 percent more - an extra $320 - in overall property taxes next year to the city, county and other taxing jurisdictions.
By comparison, for the median-value homeowner in the Payne-Phalen neighborhood, taxes fall about 6.6 percent, due in large part to a dramatic 32 percent decrease in taxable market value.
That 32 percent drop is not all due to sliding home values.
The state's new Homestead Market Value Exclusion allows the owner to exclude 40 percent of the property's first $76,000 in home value. That adds up to a maximum exclusion of just over $30,000.
The exclusion decreases for homes valued above $76,000, and disappears entirely for homes valued above $413,000.
"Those Merriam Park, Snelling, Lexington, Hamline folks are higher up in home values, and it means they don't get as much of a reduction from the Homestead Market Value Exclusion," said Chris Samuel, Ramsey County manager of property records and revenue.
A HUNGRY GORILLA
Proponents of the new Homestead exclusion call it badly needed relief for residents in lower-valued properties who may be in danger of foreclosure, but some critics believe property-tax relief should be based on income, rather than home value.
With cities and counties hit by cuts in state aid, a number of taxing authorities have proposed increasing their tax levies, the total amount of property taxes collected from property owners.
Levies and budgets are finalized in December. Barring last-minute changes, St. Paul's 2012 tax levy will increase 6.5 percent over 2011 to reach $100.76 million, the St. Paul School District's tax levy is increasing 3.6 percent to $126 million, and Ramsey County's tax levy is rising 1.7 percent to $271.79 million.
The Metropolitan Council's proposed 2012 property tax levy is $77.7 million, an increase of 3 percent (or $2.3 million) over 2011. The council is debating lowering the increase to 2 percent before the levy is adopted Dec. 14.
The Ramsey County Regional Rail Authority, the St. Paul Port Authority and the St. Paul Housing and Redevelopment Authority are not increasing their tax levies for 2012.
What's this mean for the typical St. Paul homeowner? The answer is what you pay largely varies by where you live. That's because tax levies are like a big stew being prepared for a hungry gorilla.
Even if the amount of stew stays the same or increases only slightly, one cook (or homeowner) contributing fewer ingredients (or taxes) to the stew forces the next cook to contribute more.
When one homeowner's home value slides dramatically and his or her property taxes drop, someone else whose home value slid less dramatically has to contribute more.
WHERE THE SLIDE IS LESS DRAMATIC
In the Merriam Park/Snelling/Lexington/Hamline district, the market value of a median-value house is expected to drop 8.9 percent next year, from $247,400 to $227,500.
Instead of dropping in step, annual property taxes will increase more than 9 percent for that house, from $3,523 to $3,843. That's an overall tax increase of $320, the largest percentage increase and second-largest dollar increase in the city.
"To the extent that most of the other areas are decreasing in value faster than the Merriam Park area, Merriam Park homes are holding their value much better, so they're a larger share of the tax base," Samuel said. "Their taxes increase as a result of that."
Along a similar vein, Summit Hill homeowners will see property values drop 5.7 percent, but taxes increase 8.2 percent, or $412. Those who live in the Macalester-Groveland neighborhood will notice property values drop almost 9 percent, but their taxes go up 7.4 percent, or about $276.
The Highland, Como and Hamline-Midway neighborhoods will also experience noticeable tax increases of 7.8 percent, 6.9 percent and 5.2 percent, respectively.
'HOUSE VALUE IS RELATIVE'
At the other end of the spectrum, property taxes will drop in seven planning districts, none more so than the Payne-Phalen neighborhood. After the Homestead Market Value Exclusion is applied, market values there are tumbling more than 32 percent, the median home falling from $116,700 to $79,100.
As a result, property taxes for that house will go from $1,465 to $1,369, a decrease of $96, or 6.6 percent, the largest percentage and dollar decrease in the city.
In the Thomas-Dale neighborhood, where market values are poised to tumble 36 percent to just under $62,000 after the exclusion, property taxes would be $1,079, instead of $1,147 at the median. That's a drop of $68, or 5.9 percent.
John Mannillo, a downtown developer and Highland Park resident who ran unsuccessfully for St. Paul City Council, notes property taxes rose 7.8 percent in the neighborhood where he lives, despite an 8.7 percent drop in the median market value.
"Yeah, Highland Park is shouldering a greater burden," he said. "I talk about it more than most people. They don't understand why, if their house values go down, they still have to pay more taxes. Well, the bills aren't going down for the city. And your house value is relative to other homes."
Ramsey County sent out "Truth in Taxation" statements Friday, and they should arrive at residents' doors any day. The statements provide an overview of all the property taxes the homeowner will likely pay if proposed tax levies are adopted as expected by Dec. 14.
Frederick Melo can be reached at 651-228-2172.
TAX HEARINGS
Ramsey County will have a public budget and property tax hearing at 6:30 p.m. Nov. 28 at Roseville Area High School. The city of St. Paul will hold its own budget and tax hearing at 6 p.m. Dec. 7 at City Hall.
ON THE WEB
Ramsey County property and taxes: co.ramsey.mn.us/prr
City of St. Paul 2012 budget: 1.usa.gov/SPbudgetinfo
Email
Font Resize
Sharon Anderson · St. Paul Central
http://www.scotusblog.com/case-files/cases/magner-v-gallagher
/ Read the Briefs Sharon tried to bring this out in the last Election CitySt.Pauls_Ponzi Schemes ROW Fees must be constitutionally challanged. Currently Sharon Claim with City for Theft of her Car etc. Defendants Answer due. Sharon is in 2013 Forclosure caused by Theft, Trespass, Treason of City Officials. www.taxthemax.blogspot.com
Forensic Files at www.sharon4anderson.org Reality 4 St.Paul is Coming http://www.angelfire.com/planet/andersonadvocates/PDFedem2006/file4.pdf.
LEGAL NOTICE: /s/Sharon4Anderson@aol.com ECF_P165913Pacersa1299 telfx: 651-776-5835:
Attorney ProSe_InFact,Private Attorney General QuiTam Whistleblower, www.taxthemax.blogspot.com
The Electronic Communications Privacy Act, 18 U.S.C.
Ch.119 Sections 2510-2521 et seq., governs distribution of this "Message,"
including attachments, may contain the originator's
proprietary information. The originator hereby notifies
recipients Message review, dissemination, copying, and content-based
actions. Authorized carriers of this message
shall expeditiously deliver this Message to intended recipients. See: Quon
v. Arch. IMPORTANT DISCLAIMER
This site is for educational purposes only, dedicated to promoting political speech protected by the First Amendment. As you can imagine, we receive thousands of stories and requests for input from consumers all across the country. Given the sheer volume, we cannot respond to all inquiries. This site is dedicated to serving and protecting homeowners and restoring the integrity of our court systems. This site is for educational purposes only. The purposes of this website is to share information and knowledge and to advance fundamental Constitutional rights especially the First Amendment.
Friday, November 18, 2011
Sharon vs.CitySt.Paul_GrandJury Demand 2011
1058 Summit Ave St.Paul,MN Sharon and her Disabled Marine
husband were "kicked" 1988 out even tho NO Mortgage and Taxes
were paid on a Non Homestead Basis_ Andersons_Tenants in
Common Petersons were Denied Due Process.
Flipping for 20 years by the Lesbian Judge's Kathleen Gearin et al
http://www.angelfire.com/planet/andersonadvocates/PDFedem2006/file4.pdf
Thurs.17Nov2011
ON THE GRAVES OF OUR HERITAGE: SHARONS TENANTS IN COMMON DAD 1STR.Wm. O Peterson re: 1058 Summit_PO Box 4384 St.Paul,MN
ISSUES:
(1) HUD REGULATIONS_USSC:10-1032 CitySt.Paul _Magner who lives in Stillwater
(2) CONSTITUTIONALITY WARD 2 EleCTION re: SharonScarrellaAnderson vs. CitySt.Paul et al and Dave Thune.
(3) Cop Corruption re: Metro Gang Strike Force Settlement.
Legal Notice to State of Minnesota via Hon.Gub. Mark Dayton,Attorney General Lori Swanson http://www.ag.state.mn.us/ , http://ag.state.nv.us/newsroom/press/2011/Indictment.pdf
Sample Indictment of Nevada AG, Lori Swanson has wilfully ignored the Constitution and Laws of the USA and Minnesota. http://www.barden4ag.com/
All Agencies,Political Subdivisions ie: 87 Countys specifically Ramsey Co. Attorney John Choi et al. Citys specifically http://www.ci.stpaul.mn.us/ Mayor Chris Coleman et al, Council,Attorneys et al, Municipalities,Townships,SchoolBoards etc.
AFFIDAVIT OF SHARON ANDERSON CANDIDATE JUSTICE/SENATE64 2012
Re: Penalitys of Perjury affiant Sharon a VA Widow has been reduced to Poverty, "taking" all RealEstate_Water_Cars_Trailers_Personal Property even her Right to Vote in a pdf format. contrary to 42USC 3631 and Title 18
Wednesday, November 16, 2011 http://lenderscompliance.blogspot.com/
COUNT I Hud
The Empire Strikes Back: HUD's Fair Lending Standards
On November 16, 2011, the Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) issued a proposal, entitled Implementation of the Fair Housing Act's Discriminatory Effects Standard. Comments from the public are due by January 17, 2012.
COUNT II
More videos for metro gang strike force settlement »
COUNT III Title 18 Forensic Files http://www.sharon4anderson.org/
COUNT III Title 18 Forensic Files http://www.sharon4anderson.org/
The Empire Strikes Back: HUD's Fair Lending Standards
On November 16, 2011, the Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) issued a proposal, entitled Implementation of the Fair Housing Act's Discriminatory Effects Standard. Comments from the public are due by January 17, 2012.
LEGAL NOTICE: /s/Sharon4Anderson@aol.com ECF_P165913Pacersa1299 telfx: 651-776-5835:
Attorney ProSe_InFact,Private Attorney General QuiTam Whistleblower, http://www.blogger.com/profile/17187848282847569592
The Electronic Communications Privacy Act, 18 U.S.C.
Ch.119 Sections 2510-2521 et seq., governs distribution of this "Message,"
including attachments, may contain the originator's
proprietary information. The originator hereby notifies
recipients Message review, dissemination, copying, and content-based
actions. Authorized carriers of this message
shall expeditiously deliver this Message to intended recipients. See: Quon
v. Arch. IMPORTANT DISCLAIMER
This site is for educational purposes only, dedicated to promoting political speech protected by the First Amendment. As you can imagine, we receive thousands of stories and requests for input from consumers all across the country. Given the sheer volume, we cannot respond to all inquiries. This site is dedicated to serving and protecting homeowners and restoring the integrity of our court systems. This site is for educational purposes only. The purposes of this website is to share information and knowledge and to advance fundamental Constitutional rights especially the First Amendment.
Wednesday, November 2, 2011
Sharon_CitySt.Paul_USSC:10-1032_Magner
Wed. 2Nov2011
Affidavit of Sharon Anderson Candidate Ward2 from her
Legal Homesteaded Residence at 1058 Summit Ave St.Paul,MN
QUESTIONS:
Pending USSC: 10-1032 Magner v. Gallagher_ Is the City arbitrarily forcing illegal "Ordinances" Ratifications pending this Law Suit?
http://stpaul.legistar.com/Calendar.aspx
Magner v. GallagherPending petition 6th Conference to be heard Fri.4Nov2011| Docket No. | Op. Below | Argument | Opinion | Vote | Author | Term |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 10-1032 | 8th Cir. | TBD | TBD | TBD | TBD |
Issue: (1) Whether disparate impact claims are cognizable under the Fair Housing Act; and, if so (2) what test should be used to analyze them.
LEGAL NOTICE: /s/Sharon4Anderson@aol.com ECF_P165913Pacersa1299 telfx: 651-776-5835:
Attorney ProSe_InFact,Private Attorney General QuiTam Whistleblower, http://www.blogger.com/profile/17187848282847569592
The Electronic Communications Privacy Act, 18 U.S.C.
Ch.119 Sections 2510-2521 et seq., governs distribution of this "Message,"
including attachments, may contain the originator's
proprietary information. The originator hereby notifies
recipients Message review, dissemination, copying, and content-based
actions. Authorized carriers of this message
shall expeditiously deliver this Message to intended recipients. See: Quon
v. Arch. IMPORTANT DISCLAIMER
This site is for educational purposes only, dedicated to promoting political speech protected by the First Amendment. As you can imagine, we receive thousands of stories and requests for input from consumers all across the country. Given the sheer volume, we cannot respond to all inquiries. This site is dedicated to serving and protecting homeowners and restoring the integrity of our court systems. This site is for educational purposes only. The purposes of this website is to share information and knowledge and to advance fundamental Constitutional rights especially the First Amendment.
Saturday, October 29, 2011
Elect Sharon4Seniors Ward2_CitySt.Paul_Schanno_Mole_Wringer
RECENT POSTS
- Schanno wants Sharon Anderson off the ballot
- Bostrom challenges Xiong take on Payne-Maryland project
- Minnesota Rising hosts UnConference in Lowertown
- With Hosko on the attack, Dave Thune pulls out the big guns: Mom
- Eve Stein wants her stolen lawn signs back
ARCHIVES
Schanno wants Sharon Anderson off the ballot
- 28 October, 2011 //
- City Hall Scoop //
- Tags :
Now is when things get rough, tough and … and … (dare we say it? yes we dare) … even snippy in St. Paul City Council races. And by rough, tough and snippy, the Scoop doesn’t just mean, “Don’t vote for my competitor.”
The Scoop means… “don’t allow my competitor on the ballot.”
That’s the tactic in the downtown / West End corner known as Ward 2, where one candidate is trying to get a second candidate booted out of the election even before Election Day, and blaming a third candidate — the incumbent city council member — that she’s even made it this far.
Confused? Here’s how it works:
Perennial candidate Sharon Anderson is running for election to the City Council in Ward 2, which would lead one to surmise that she actually lives in or around downtown or somewhere near West Seventh Street. Wrong, says fellow Ward 2 candidate Cynthia Schanno.
Anderson uses both her Summit Avenue address and a P.O. Box in her election filings, notes Schanno, even though Anderson lost her home in a tax dispute in 1988. Anderson apparently lives on the East Side, or did so when she videotaped this YouTube message in 2009: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IgDuL6Vf6Rw
Of the video, Anderson said: “That doesn’t prove anything. I’ve got 13 pieces of property.”
“My legal residence is 1058 Summit Avenue,” Anderson told the Scoop on Friday. “She’s trying to make a name for herself. She emailed me. She has published this on her website saying I’m not a viable candidate. Well, then make a complaint. If she’s going to be publishing false statements, the election law is you have to file a complaint with the office of administrative hearings. … Why doesn’t she sue me? Why doesn’t she file a legal complaint?”
The Scoop asked Anderson: “Where do you live, Sharon?”
To which Anderson responded: “It doesn’t matter. I have properties up in Itasca, I have properties up in Aitkin … ”
To which the Scoop interrupted: “Do you have property in Ward 2?”
To which Anderson responded: “I own 1058 Summit Avenue, with my dead tenants in common. … I’m not going to let a house go. The house was paid for. … Until she’s filed a valid complaint, I’m going to ignore her. … I could be living in my car, for all she knows.”
Anderson, who maintains she has been “reduced to poverty,” previously told the Scoop that she has to ask for rides from friends to the Dorothy Day Center in downtown St. Paul for meals. It stands to reason she might not rest her head at night in downtown proper. But could she really live… outside the ward? (Cue suspenseful music here…)
So, if Schanno’s allegations are true, who’s fault is it that Anderson’s name remains on the ballot? Clearly, it’s Council Member’s Dave Thune’s fault.
Wait. Hold up. Remind the tape. What?!
Schanno writes on her website, referring to herself in the third person: “Schanno alleged that incumbent Dave Thune knows Anderson is not eligible to be on the ballot but has said and done nothing because the situation benefits him.”
How could that be? Schanno’s press release doesn’t explain that point in detail, but hey, the Scoop surmises, it could be like this: Schanno and Anderson are the only women on the Ward 2 ballot. Together, they’d split the female vote faster than you can say “Bachmann vs. Palin.”
Furthermore, Anderson is a self-described Republican (though judging by previous GOP attempts to get her booted from previous elections, the party has no deep affection for her.) Schanno is at least a bit right of center, so the two appear to share some political space, at least on paper.
Schanno writes: “Anderson can siphon off a few hundred votes when voters mistake her for a more well known woman by the same name.”
Well, well. Let the battle be unjoined!
Posting as Sharon Anderson (Change)
-
Sharon Anderson · St. Paul CentralShame on Schanno , who Affiant VA Widow Sharon Scarrella Anderson aka Peterson_Chergosky alleges Ms Schanno is making FALSE Statement to Ruin Sharons Credit and to malign Sharons Reputation etc. File no 495722 1988 When the Lesbian Judge KIathleen Gearin "kicked out the Disabled Anderson" Silver StarMarine suffering from Major PSTD and then trying to force $110,000.00 hundred and ten thousand dollars to cover up Major RealEstate Ponzi Schemes by the City St.Paul, County Ramsey. Sharon alleges that Ms. Schanno who has a Daughter apparantly never Married?
request that Ms Schanno disclose if Schanno ever Married. Sharon verily alleges that Ms. Schanno has never Voted in St.Paul Has never attended a Council Hearing and is a Mole_Wringer for the REpublican Party. Currently Sharon4Seniors is duly concerned for Property Homeowners... and must Challenge certain Statutes as Unconstitutionally Vague, Arbitrary re: Canvass Board and Assessments https://www.revisor.mn.gov/statutes/?id=429 - that the St.Paul City Council has illegally for years used to Condemn and "take" our propertys Ms. Schanno put your 400 hundred thousand Condo at 256 Spring St. purschased from Rottlund Inc (sp) and your JC Aviation in the Flood Plaine Downtown St.Paul, and legally file your Distorted Ramblings now published re: Times vs. Sullivan to Force a Grand Jury to investigate. Sharon is challanging Constitutionality to force the State Attorney General to defend the Law's www.barden4ag.com
Cynthia Schanno · SubscribeSubscribed · Top Commenter · Saint Paul, MinnesotaIn your never ending effort to distort or should I say misinterpreted the facts...
The statute reads a city council candidate must live within the ward. It is common knowledge Ms. Anderson (a perpetual candidate) DOES NOT. The shame here is when you talk with county and/or city officials “they” state it is not their responsibility to verify or enforce the rules. My question then was “Well who is responsible?”.
The irony here is it is up to a challenging candidate and/or citizen to file a formal complaint, meaning the burden once again falls to the tax payers and/or a candidate who must to incur the time and cost to bring forward a formal complaint. This seems utterly asinine and frankly it is outrageous to me and I am simply pointing out the facts so the public is aware.
Our city council representatives state it is important to hold a fair race. Mr. Thune knows Sharon does not live in the ward, most everyone knows that… allowing Sharon to stay on the ballot makes a mockery of our system and our “new” electoral process, which “everyone” voted for but nobody knows how it works.
You are questioning my motive rather than bring light to the facts… If you had bothered to pick up the phone and ask me direct the motive behind the press release maybe then you would have write the story or communicated the effort correctly. Sorry Pioneer Press you did it again. Now, I dare ask, who is playing politics?
Sharon Anderson · St. Paul Central
Put your Money where your Mouth is and if your such a concern citizen file with the OAH or Ramsey Co. Attorney re: Criminal Charges mandate Grand Jury Proceeings. www.sharon4Council.blogspot.com Ms Schanno your wilful neglience to investigate re: www.sharon4anderson.org exploiting Seniors, Disabled,Vunerable Adults is pervase/fatal
Sharon Anderson commented on blogs.twincities.com.
blogs.twincities.com
Now is when things get rough, tough and … and … (dare we say it? yes we dare) … even snippy in St. Paul City Council races. And by rough, tough and snippy, the Scoop doesn’t just mean, “Don’t vote for my competitor.”
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)