Saturday, August 9, 2008

Rev Sharon Scarrella v. Midwest Fed.S&L_536F2d 1207_No75-1912

AFFIDAVIT OF SHARON ANDERSON AKA PETERSON-CHERGOSKY-SCARRELLA
Dtd.Sat.9Aug08 Forensic Evidence online, Blue Book for educational purposes
LEGAL NOTICE TO CHALLENGE THE 64A HOUSE ELECTION
(1)The "taking's" of Sharons ownership in FEE SIMPLE ABSOLUTE
paid for Homestead at 1058 Summit Ave. St. Paul,MN.55104-0384, acquired before coveture to 2nd Marriage, Cpl James R. Anderson
32 yrs ago, White Collar Crime _ City of St. Paul, acting in Concort with Corrupt Courts ie: former Asst. Ramsey
County Attorney, now Judge Kathleen Gearin? in a "Patterened Enterprise" RICO
must be addressed_ Compensation must be awarded.
ISSUE: Property taxes based on non-homestead, when Owner Sharon Scarrella with parents Tenants in Common, Sharon's 2nd Disabled Husband James R. Anderson were entitled to
FULL HOMESTEAD CREDITS:/ Disabled Property Tax Credits42 USC 3631
Documents pdf files Thank God,Gates and Google
This RICO Patterned is continuing today 609, Criminal Code by Illegal Assessments,
against your propetys, Ratified Unconstitutionally. reducing the citizenerty to poverty.
Realestate Quiet Titles must be reopened. No Statutes of Limitations on Fraud and or Murder.
Sharon and others are reduced to Poverty, Slaves to City Taxaction?
(2) Count II Minn. Constitution Art. III Separation of Powers
Normally when writing letters, cases used require a Summary
Learned that 30 yrs ago with Divorce Reform Inc. ie: http://richard-bullock.blogspot.com/
Scarrella v. Midwest Federal Sav. and Loan, 536 F.2d 1207 (C.A.8 (Minn.), 1976)

The following is a portion of the document you requested. Please subscribe to view the entire document.

Page 1207

536 F.2d 1207

Rev. Sharon L. SCARRELLA et al., Appellants,
v.
MIDWEST FEDERAL SAVINGS AND LOAN et al., Appellees.

No. 75-1912.

United States Court of Appeals,
Eighth Circuit.

Submitted May 27, 1976.
Decided June 8, 1976.

Page 1208

Rev. Sharon L. Scarrella, pro se.

Thomas E. Harms, Minneapolis, Minn., for appellees.

Before HEANEY, BRIGHT and ROSS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

The appellants in this action are the Reverend Sharon Scarrella, a self-ordained minister of the Church of Justice Reform, Inc., the Reverend Richard Bullock, and Albert Brisson. They appeal an interlocutory order of the district court 1 dismissing appellants Bullock and Brisson as plaintiffs in the action pending below. 2 Additionally,

Page 1209

appellants Scarrella and Bullock have filed a motion requesting all of the judges of this court to disqualify themselves.

We deny the motion for disqualification and dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction.

I. Motion for Disqualification.

The grounds alleged by appellants for disqualification of the members of this court are (1) that the members of this court are involved with or are members of, the Minnesota State Bar Association and the American Bar Association, both of which were defendants in a separate class action suit brought by the appellants and (2) that the members of this court have a "unique relationship" with the members of the legal profession and the financial interests in the state of Minnesota and as such cannot render a fair and impartial decision. Such vague allegations of prejudice are insufficient to require disqualification of any member of this court. 28 U.S.C. § 455. See Wounded Knee Legal Defense/Offense Committee v. F.B.I., 507 F.2d 1281, 1285 (8th Cir. 1974).

II. Jurisdiction.

Rule 11 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure requires that every pleading be signed by the party filing it, or by that party's attorney. Here the notice of appeal, which was purported to be on behalf of all appellants, was signed only by appellant Scarrella, who is not an attorney. Since appellants Bullock and Brisson did not sign the notice of appeal, their appeals must be dismissed. McKinney v. DeBord, 507 F.2d 501 (9th Cir. 1974); cf. Huffman v. Nebraska Bureau of Vital Statistics, 320 F.Supp. 154 (D.Neb. 1970). As the court in Huffman stated in applying Fed.R.Civ.P. 11 in an analogous situation

* * * one of the justifications * * * of Rule 11 is to make certain that the persons who are named as parties are actually in assent to the filing of an action on their behalf * * *.

Id. at 156.

...

How can I view the whole document? Why subscribe? What is Fastcase?

Member Login
username:
password:

Subscribe
$95: Monthly National Premium
$995: Annual National Premium
Purchase Document ...$4.99 (per document)
first name:
last name:
email: (this will be your username)
select a password:
credit card type:
credit card number:
expiration date:
credit card holder name:

Please do not click twice as it may result in your credit card being charged more than once.

This applys to Canons
One recurrent example involves federal statutes that lack an explicit limitation period within which to initiate legal
action. See North Star Steel v. Thomas, 515 U.S. 29, 33 (1995) (referring to numerous specific statutes). While
there may be rare instances in which this decis ion is conscious and deliberate (see note 2 infra), it generally reflects
simply insufficient attention to detail.
2 See, e.g., Landgraf v. USI Film Prod., 511 U.S. 244, 262-63 (1994) (concluding, based on review of legislative
history, that supporters of 1991 Civil Rights Act “agreed to disagree about whether and to what extent the Act would
apply to preenactment conduct”). See generally Miriam R. Jorgensen & Kenneth A. Shepsle, A Comment on the
Positive Canons Project, 57 LAW & CONTEMP. PROBS. 43, 44-45 (Winter 1994); Nicholas Quinn Rosenkranz,
Federal Rules of Statutory Interpretation, 115 HARV. L. REV. 2085, 2155 (2002).
3 Congress also invites this gap-filling from executive branch agencies. See generally Edward Rubin, Dynamic
Statutory Interpretation in the Administrative State, www.bepress.com/ils/iss3/art.2 (2002).
4 See, e.g., Lorillard Tobacco v. Reilly, 533 U.S. 525 (2001) (adjudicating tobacco industry’s right to engage in
certain forms of cigarette advertising); United States v. Microsoft Corp., 253 F. 3d 34 (D.C. Cir. 2001) (adjudicating
extent of government’s ability to regulate internet access). See generally John Ferejohn, Judicializing Politics,
Politicizing Law, 65 LAW & CONTEMP. PROBS. 41, 64-65 (Summer 2002).›ÿ˜Š7&÷ó¦
IT PAYS TO KEEP RECORDS
Sharon4Anderson Scribd
Public Domain Candidate Profile FCC Complaints - http://sharons-copywrite.blogspot.com/
LEGAL NOTICE: /s/Sharon4Anderson@aol.com ECF_P165913Pacersa1299 telfx: 651-776-5835: Document's are based on SEC filings, current events, interviews, press releases, andknowledge gained as financial journalists, Private Attorney Generals, Candidsecurities they recommend to readers, affiliated entities, employees, and agents an initial trade recommendation published on the Internet, after a direct mail publication is sent, before acting Google Search Times v. Sullvian Libel with malice - on that recommendations, and may contain errors. Investment decisions should not be based solely on these or other Public MY FindLaw Office documents expressly forbids its writers from having financial interests in Google Search BlogItBabe2007 Sharon4Anderson's Legal BlogBriefs Sharon4Anderson St.Paul City Council Ward2 SA-Blogs2007 Blogger: Dashboard
SHARON-MN-ECF: Judges-Greylord-Libby-Guilty LUFSKY Scap129FAnokaP2697(1976) Cpl James R. Anderson USMC 11022885 Bio for Sharon Anderson , TAKING DL_AOL Journal Legal Eagle SharonAnderson 1 Journalism Ethics Blogger: 1986 Petition Jane Duchene MN Bull SharonScarrellaAndersonUSBriefs - Buzznet Sharon'sFedCases1973to2006_13pdf Anderson
Posted by at

Thursday, August 7, 2008

Illegal Assessments by City St.Paul,MN

08/06/2008Video Open Video Only in Windows Media Player 03h 28mAgenda

Click on Video go to Last Item,74 for Harris request from City Attorney Gerald Henderickson for legal opinion on E-parte communications,

which include citizens e-mail rebuttals,objections, etc.

Back Forward Print Home









City of St. Paul

ITEM 37:Real Estate Division

Dept.of Technology & Management Serv. COUNCIL FILE NO._____________

REPORT OF COMPLETION OF ASSESSMENT File No. SEE BELOW

Assessment No. SEE BELOW

Voting

Ward In the matter of the assessment of benefits, cost and expenses for

J0807C (8530) Demolition of vacant buildings during the month of June, 2008.

J0801E (8541) Summary abatement excessive consumption of inspection services for

property code violations billed during the time period of December 24 to April 11,

2008.

J0813A (8543) Summary abatement (property clean-up) on private property during the

time period of June 30 to July 14, 2008.

J0813G (8544) Providing weekly garbage hauling services during July 2 to July 15,

2008.

0805T (9064) Removing diseased elm trees from private properties at 0 Euclid St

and 0 3rd St in 2008.

To the Council of the City of St. Paul

The Valuation and Assessment Engineer hereby reports to the Council the

following as a statement of the expenditures necessarily incurred for and in

connection with the making of the above improvement, viz:

Total costs $142,071.99

Park Service Fee $ 50.00

Code – Enforcement Service Fee $ 14,750.00

Real Estate Service Fee $ 9,420.00

TOTAL EXPENDITURES $166,291.99

Charge To

Net Assessment $166,291.99

Said Valuation and Assessment Engineer further reports that he has assessed and

levied the total amount as above ascertained, to-wit: the sum of $166,291.99 upon

each and every lot, part or parcel of land deemed benefitted by the said improvement,

and in the case of each lot, part or parcel of land in accordance with the benefits

conferred thereon; that the said assessment has been completed, and that hereto

attached, identified by the signature of the said Valuation and Assessment Engineer,

and made a part hereof, is the said assessment as completed by him, and which is

herewith submitted to the Council for such action thereon as may be considered

proper.

Dated: Valuation and Assessment Engineer:

________________

item 73:City of St. Paul

Real Estate Division

Dept.of Technology & Management Serv. COUNCIL FILE NO._____________

REPORT OF COMPLETION OF ASSESSMENT File No. SEE BELOW

Assessment No. SEE BELOW

Voting

Ward In the matter of the assessment of benefits, cost and expenses for

J0806C (8503) Demolition of vacant building during the months of April and May,

2008.

J0807P (8509) Summary Abatements (graffiti removal) on private properties during

the time period of April 23 to May 23, 2008.

J0803B (8510) Emergency boarding and securing and Boarding of vacant buildings

during the month of April 2008.

J0810A (8521) Summary abatement (property clean-up) on private property during the

time period of May 7 to May 30, 2008.

J0810G (8522) Weekly garbage hauling services during the time period of May 14 to

May 28, 2008.

To the Council of the City of St. Paul

The Valuation and Assessment Engineer hereby reports to the Council the

following as a statement of the expenditures necessarily incurred for and in

connection with the making of the above improvement, viz:

Total costs $190,996.72

Park Service Fee $

Code – Enforcement Service Fee $ 25,150.00

Real Estate Service Fee $ 10,840.00

TOTAL EXPENDITURES $226,986.72

Charge To

Net Assessment $226,986.72

Said Valuation and Assessment Engineer further reports that he has assessed and

levied the total amount as above ascertained, to-wit: the sum of $226,986.72 upon

each and every lot, part or parcel of land deemed benefitted by the said improvement,

and in the case of each lot, part or parcel of land in accordance with the benefits

conferred thereon; that the said assessment has been completed, and that hereto

attached, identified by the signature of the said Valuation and Assessment Engineer,

and made a part hereof, is the said assessment as completed by him, and which is

herewith submitted to the Council for such action thereon as may be considered

proper.

Dated: Valuation and Assessment Engineer:

_____________ _____________________________________

Posted by at

Wednesday, August 6, 2008

Sharons Legal Objections to Wed6Jul08 Agenda

Legal Notice to the State of Minnesota http://www.state.mn.us/ , http://www.co.ramsey.mn.us/
http://www.ci.stpaul.mn.us/ All Public Officials
Notice that the Consent Agenda is contrary to Open Meeting Laws
re: RICO Statut3es etc.
Open Letter to Consumer Advocate Nancy Lazaryan & Council Pres. Lantry
Issues of Criminal Violations of Chapter 13, triggering Illegal Assessments
Sharon has Standing re: WritProA06-1150 30Jun06
then illegally Ratified b the council, based on Theft, Trespass, Treason, False Statements
Stalking by Lantry against Sharon to not only Steal Cars, Trailers, Realestate, from a Candidate
for Public Office, but Senior, protected class, etc.
triggering major Anti Trust, Fraud and yes Murder of Sharon's Husband
Cpl James R. Anderson 21Sept2000
Sharon4Anderson Scribd now condensed with Scribd URL
www.sharonanderson.org The City for over 30 yrs has acted with Evil Motive, to Steal the Citizenery's Property Right by acting in concort with Unpublished Opinions, corrupt Judges
The Amount in Controversy is Millions that the taxpayers are unaware of
2ndly the City refuses to place on the taxsupported wb site pdf files of State & Federal Claims against the city
and or File no's so We the People can research and or Friend of the Court Briefs.
Its City of St. Paul, MN - Official Website - Council if you go to council be careful read the agenda 1st Consent Agenda 1-37
703 Surrey is 3 house from me
6. Letters from the Department of Safety and Inspection/Code Enforcement declaring 403 Curtice Street, 575 Charles Avenue, 558 Grotto Avenue North, 658 Hawthorne Avenue East, 820 Ocean Street, 592 Sims Avenue, 703 Surrey Avenue, and 719 Van Buren Avenue as nuisance properties. (For notification purposes only; public hearings will be scheduled at a later date if necessary.)

LOOK AT THE CLAIMS V. CITY SETTLEMENTS
11. Resolution - 08-812 - Approving payment in the amount of $150,000.00 to Town Square Realty, LLC, and its attorney, in full settlement of their claim against the City of Saint Paul. (GS 3057373)

12. Resolution - 08-813 -Approving payment in the amount of $15,000.00 to Christine Peachey in full settlement of her claim against the City of Saint Paul. (GS 3057453)

37. Resolution Approving Assessment - 08-838 - In the matter of the assessment of benefits, cost, and expenses for demolition of vacant buildings during June 2008 [J0807C]; summary abatement for excessive consumption of inspection services for property code violations billed from December 24, 2007 to April 11, 2008 [J0801E]; summary abatement (property cleanup) at private property from June 30 to July 14, 2008 [J0813A]; providing weekly garbage hauling services from July 2 to July 15, 2008 [J0813G]; removing diseased elm trees from private properties at 0 Euclid Street and 0 3rd Street in 2008 [0805T], and setting date of Legislative Hearings for September 2, 2008 and City Council public hearings for September 17, 2008. (GS 3057318)

DISCUSSION
40. Resolution - 08-840 - Authorizing the City to enter into a 2008 Republican National Convention (RNC) Security federal grant application. (GS 3057330)

ORDINAN
72. Resolution Ratifying Assessment - 08-857 - In the matter of the assessment of benefits, cost, and expenses for summary abatement (property clean-up) on private property at 288 Erie Street, 536 Charles Avenue, 1756 Grand Avenue, 394 Lafond Avenue, and 662 Minnehaha Avenue West from May 1 to May 14, 2008 (J0809A1), and providing weekly garbage hauling services at 69 Jessamine Avenue West on May 7, 2008 (J0809G1). [Laid over from July 16] (GS 3057191) (Legislative Hearing Officer recommends the following: 536 Charles Avenue (J0809A) - delete the assessment; 288 Erie Street (J0809A) - approve the assessment; 1756 Grand Avenue (J0809A) - reduce the assessment from a total of $414 to a total of $207; 69 Jessamine Avenue West (J0809G) - recommendation is forthcoming; 394 Lafond Avenue (J0809A) - delete the assessment; and 662 Minnehaha Avenue West (J0809A) - delete the assessment.)

73. Resolution Ratifying Assessment - 08-858 - In the matter of assessment of benefits, cost, and expenses for demolition of vacant buildings during April and May 2008 (J0806C); summary abatements (graffiti removal) on private properties from April 23 to May 23, 2008 (J0807P); emergency boarding and securing of vacant buildings during April 2008 (J0803B); summary abatement (property clean-up) on private property from May 7 to May 30, 2008 (J0810A); and weekly garbage hauling services from May 14 to May 28, 2008 (J0810G). (GS 3055370) (Legislative Hearing Officer recommends the following:

Click here: Sharon4Council Disclaimer on Site'sThe Electronic Communications Privacy Act MY FindLaw (ECPA) sets out the provisions for access, use, disclosure, interception and privacy protections of electronic communications. Home Scribd pdf files. The law was enacted in 1986 and covers various forms of wire and electronic communications. According to the U.S. Code, electronic communications "means any transfer of signs, signals, writing, images, sounds, data, or intelligence of any nature transmitted in whole or in part by a wire, radio, electromagnetic, photo electronic or photo optical system that affects interstate or foreign commerce." ECPA prohibits unlawful access and certain disclosures of communication contents. Additionally, the law prevents government entities from requiring disclosure of electronic communications from a provider without proper procedure. The Legal Institute provides Title 18 of the U.S. Code, which encompasses ECPA. Blogger: Dashboard AndersonAdvocates/ddaweborg.msnw
NOTICE: This communication is not encrypted. This e-mail (including any attachments) is covered by the Electronic Communications Privacy Act, 18 U.S.C. §§ 2510-2521, and Electronic Communications Privacy Act The CAN-SPAM Act: Requirements for Commercial Emailers

Forwarded Message:
Subj:RE: STOP! Bob Johnson Blog Manager: Libel/Malice to Sharon Scarrella Anderson
Date:8/6/2008 10:28:07 A.M. Central Daylight Time
From:Tim.Pawlenty@state.mn.us
To:Sharon4Anderson@aol.com
Sent from the Internet (Details)

Thank you for contacting Governor Pawlenty’s office with your thoughts. Because the Governor’s e-mail gets several hundred e-mail a day this reply is set up to notify you that your important message has been received.

Messages are routed to the appropriate person for assistance or compiled by issue area for the Governor’s review. Please know that your comments are important to our office and will be thoroughly considered.

If you need immediate attention, please call the Governor's office at (651) 296-3391 or 1-800-657-3717.

Thank you for taking the time to contact our office. Active and thoughtful citizens like you make Minnesota a great state in which to live.

Posted by at

STOP! Bob Johnson Blog Man:Libel/Malice to SharonScarrellaAnderson

Subj:Re: STOP! Bob Johnson Blog Manager: Libel/Malice to Sharon Scarrella Anderson
Date:8/6/2008 9:57:29 A.M. Central Daylight Time
From:Sharon4Anderson
To:rbljohnson@yahoo.com, askdoj@usdoj.gov, rca@co.ramsey.mn.us, tim.pawlenty@state.mn.us, attorney.general@state.mn.us, rway@minnpost.com, sberg@minnpost.com, swaterman@minnpost.com, bhawkins@minnpost.com, dbeal@minnpost.com, brobson@minnpost.com, sjanecek@minnpost.com, info@minnpost.com, mhelms@minnpost.com, ccapecchi@minnpost.com, sschmickle@minnpost.com, lbenson@minnpost.com, rbattle@minnpost.com, jkimball@minnpost.com, dgrow@minnpost.com, bob.fletcher@co.ramsey.mn.us, matt.bostrom@ci.stpaul.mn.us, neil.melton@state.mn.us, john.harrington@ci.stpaul.mn.us, mary.bjornberg@state.mn.us, kwilkening@co.nobles.mn.us, terry.sandbeck@state.mn.us, johnp@alx.tec.mn.us, mitch.lee@state.mn.us, mylan.masson@minneapolis.edu, paul.monteen@state.mn.us, tracey.a.martin@co.hennepin.mn.us, mark.letexier@co.polk.mn.us, john.bolduc@co.crow-wing.mn.us, dan.glass@state.mn.us, brent.richter@state.mn.us, debra.soderbeck@state.mn.us, mdohman@ci.maple-grove.mn.us, sheryl.waddick@state.mn.us, junstad@yahoo.com, carol.j.hall@state.mn.us, mike.ardolf@state.mn.us, bill.martinez@ci.stpaul.mn.us, michael.young@ci.minneapolis.mn.us, peggy.strand@state.mn.us, timbildsoe@visi.com, starr.suggs@state.mn.us, harr@csp.edu, diverson@pioneerpress.com, dbeal@pioneerpress.com, mhopp@pioneerpress.com, rhubbard@pioneerpress.com, twebb@pioneerpress.com, jforster@pioneerpress.com, jkrocheski@pioneerpress.com, jbjorhus@pioneerpress.com, khubbard@pioneerpress.com, aharrington@pioneerpress.com, lsuzukamo@pioneerpress.com, dfondler@pioneerpress.com, janice.rettman@co.ramsey.mn.us, david.twa@co.ramsey.mn.us, chiefclerk@co.ramsey.mn.us, tony.bennett@co.ramsey.mn.us, jim.mcdonough@co.ramsey.mn.us, rafael.e.ortega@co.ramsey.mn.us, jan.parker@co.ramsey.mn.us, toni.carter@co.ramsey.mn.us, victoria.reinhardt@co.ramsey.mn.us, rob.fulton@co.ramsey.mn.us, bonnie.jackelen@co.ramsey.mn.us, john.choi@ci.stpaul.mn.us, john.lesch@ci.stpaul.mn.us, lisa.veith@ci.stpaul.mn.us, john.kelly@ci.stpaul.mn.us, jerry.hendrickson@ci.stpaul.mn.us, dave.thune@ci.stpaul.mn.us, pat.harris@ci.stpaul.mn.us, kathy.lantry@ci.stpaul.mn.us, Lee.Helgen@ci.stpaul.mn.us, dan.bostrom@ci.stpaul.mn.us, russ.stark@ci.stpaul.mn.us, Melvin.Carter@ci.stpaul.mn.us
CC:nancylazaryan@gmail.com, 2wmcg@earthlink.net, BillDahn3
Wed.6th,Jul08
TO THE ABOVE NAMED: REBUTTAL FROM CANDIDATE
http://sharon4staterep64a.blogspot.com/ Sharon Scarrella Anderson
Pursuant to Freedom of Speech, it may be prudent for the alleged Bob Johnson to be investigated: COUNT IDefamation and the First Amendment
By information and belief, Apparantly Bobby Johnson who holds himself out to be a Blog Author, he is not an informed "Webmaster: also apparantly is a government informent????
Accusing persons without forensic evidence: seeking Resraining "Orders" without Probable Cause
To Libel with Malice/Slander a Candidate for the MN House of Rep. 64a
the undersigned
Pursuant to the Penality of Perjury Affiant Sharon Anderson has NOT POSTED
on the inferior Blog aka ademocracy, as Sharon's Pic would come up
HOWEVER: in the Nancy Lazaryan Issue, Sharon is an interested person in the Legal Cases of Nancy Lazaryan Consumer Advocate

http://farm2.static.flickr.com/1183/1271321666_ae373e62ab.jpg?v=Monday, August 4, 2008

Statutes

Nancy Lazaryan Blogger: A Democracy - Post a Comment YES: the undersigned has posted in the Issues Of Nancy Lazaryan case law

Sites are changed, Archives of Law Library pdf format

Apparantly there may be a few Honest Lawyers, ready to take on the City?
GO GET EM NANCY

http://www.lawlibrary.state.mn.us/archive/supct/0805/OPA061188-0515.pdf
S Y L L A B U S
1. When the express language of a state statute defines the scope of permissible municipal regulations, we determine the validity of municipal regulations on the same subject by applying the plain language of the statute.
2. Under Minn. Stat. § 16B.62, subd. 1 (2006), a municipal rental licensing ordinance regulating components or systems of a residential structure covered by the State Building Code is invalid where the municipal ordinance imposes different requirements than the State Building Code.
3. Inspection standards in a municipal rental licensing ordinance regulating ground fault interrupter receptacles, bathroom ventilation, and egress window covers are invalid under Minn. Stat. § 16B.62, subd. 1, because the inspection standards are building"

4:46 PM

Anonymous Anonymous said... he Law re:

Apparantly Tierney wins on Appeal
http://bulk.resource.org/courts.gov/c/F3/416/416.F3d.864.04-3040.html

9:29 AM

FURTHER: IN THE RICO CASE's the extreme poor taste of Blog Manager, appears to destroy
the RICO Cases by Stupid Pic's, Crude inflamatory, statements to undermine the Attorneys Work Product Doctrine: Sharon Anderson, forensic analyst has posted case law, transcriped the cases
also found
United States District Court - District of Minnesota https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEhlTFKNQSVi78r3qFgsLOfsu3aKulciImu5xcX14e08exLALj8vUObW33OBYpOsWwycN4v1Da9plD-3cV1NJU2zJkBFXeRTCHv0uzvTptTQu8mXM5ZTJNLPLim0C4AOblEkW9oET-Hz2bFM/s1600-h/joe-horses_ass03_copy.jpg











Please click onto the COMMENTS for the story.


posted by Bob at Wednesday, July 30, 2008 49 comments links to this post http://www.blogger.com/email-post.g?blogID=http://www.blogger.com/post-edit.g?blogID=

SES: Which th Blog in such poor taste:
Blogger: A Democracy - Post a Comment AFFIANT HAS POSTED CASE LAW:

Federal Files are online
Look at new Site
Suggestion Lawyers Compromise all the time http://www.mnd.uscourts.gov/

Bobby your doing a great job
We all Win if the Landlords Win

Trying to assist with pdf files

http://www.scribd.com/my_docs#

aFederal courts charge 08 cents a page

The Landlords will beat the city if all files are in Order

10:20 AM

Bobby Blog must force the city to put files online in pdf format
We the taxpayers have the Right to know, Further A State and or Federal Jury must be convene

As a victim of Thune,Lanty etc. We also donate time, work product, etc. to help expose the corruption in the City Easier Read and to print one page at a time
http://www.scribd.com/doc/4382395/Steinhauser-et-al-v-City-StPaulMagner-

9:05 AM

APPARANTLY THE CITY - MAGNER ARE GUILTY IN A "PATTERENED ENTERPRISE" TO CONFISCATE ALL PROPERTYS RICO 18USC

THANKS SEEBA, CASE LAW USED AGAINST THE CITY AND YOU AS AN ATTORNEY FOR THE CITY.
INDICTMENTS AGAINST THE CITY MUST ISSUE:
http://biotech.law.lsu.edu/cases/RICO/northwestern_bell.htm

The Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act (RICO), 18 U.S.C. §§ 1961-1968, which is Title IX of the Organized Crime Control Act of 1970 (OCCA), imposes criminal and civil liability upon persons who engage in certain "prohibited activities," each of which is defined to include, as a necessary element, proof of a "pattern of racketeering activity," § 1962. "Racketeering activity" means "any act or threat involving" specified state-law crimes, any "act" indictable under specified federal statutes, and certain federal "offenses." § 1961(1). A "pattern" requires "at least two acts of racketeering activity" within a 10-year period. §

8:37 AM

Civil No.: 05-461 JNE/SRN
Frank J. Steinhauser, III, et al.,
please search the web, city has no idea how vast this case is
if nothing else, Steinhauser must implement the city to post files online for public Amicus Curie

http://www.justia.com/search.py?cx=001017683474852908061:ghxovtgkt-8&q=Steinhauser+et+al+v.+St+Paul%2C+City+of+et+al+more%3Alegalweb&cof=FORID%3A11#1219
You bet we back up the TRUTH
Legal Search engines, Cullen an Repke as Licensed Realestate Agents
this case is relevant to ALL

9:55 AM

NOTICE TO THE ALLEGED BOB JOHNSON:
Please do file a restraining "Order" with probable cause of who and how many members and what you are accusing persons in a protected class, Senior, Disabled, Candidate's,
Sharon Anderson ie: Peterson-Chergosky-Scarrella, Homegrown in the
State of Minnesota has not posted with her Name and Pic
in the Chat Room aka ademocracy nor has given any membership fee
and could care less :
United the Blog may have stood legally, Divided its Failure with the loss
of Nancy Lazaryan and Sharon Anderson and Others.
WHO CARES: BILLONS OF BLOGS,,Bogus Libel with Malice
must be addressed.
AND WHAT YOU ARE ACCUSING THEM OF. WHAT RESTRAINTS IN THIS
CHAT ROOM BLOG.
In a message dated 8/5/2008 9:32:00 A.M. Central Daylight Time, rbljohnson@yahoo.com writes:
Listen you crazy wacko, you post at my blog again and I will file a restraining order against you.
Anonymous Grand Jury said...
Bob Johnson, your deceit to have a false pic, of yourself, is questionable, Nancy Lazaryan has far more legal expertise then Cullen or Repke, Your sexist Blog is BS

Grow up punke ie: punk in prison talk is you know what

http://groups.google.com/group/grandjury/browse_thread/thread/73637eab4f67ea81
7:27 AM


Click here: Sharon4Council Disclaimer on Site'sThe Electronic Communications Privacy Act MY FindLaw (ECPA) sets out the provisions for access, use, disclosure, interception and privacy protections of electronic communications. Home Scribd pdf files. The law was enacted in 1986 and covers various forms of wire and electronic communications. According to the U.S. Code, electronic communications "means any transfer of signs, signals, writing, images, sounds, data, or intelligence of any nature transmitted in whole or in part by a wire, radio, electromagnetic, photo electronic or photo optical system that affects interstate or foreign commerce." ECPA prohibits unlawful access and certain disclosures of communication contents. Additionally, the law prevents government entities from requiring disclosure of electronic communications from a provider without proper procedure. The Legal Institute provides Title 18 of the U.S. Code, which encompasses ECPA. Blogger: Dashboard AndersonAdvocates/ddaweborg.msnw
NOTICE: This communication is not encrypted. This e-mail (including any attachments) is covered by the Electronic Communications Privacy Act, 18 U.S.C. §§ 2510-2521, and Electronic Communications Privacy Act The CAN-SPAM Act: Requirements for Commercial Emailers



Posted by at

Sunday, August 3, 2008

Aug 7th08 Meeting via E Commerce Sharon4Anderson@aol.com

To Whom it may concern: re: HR meetings,

Submitted in God Faith and for Resolutions

/a/ Sharon Anderson aka Peterson-Chergosky_Scarrella

ECF_P165913 Pacer sa1299 telfx: 651-76-5835

http://sharon4council.blogspot.com http://sharon4staterep64a.blogspot.com

Posted by at No comments:
Subscribe to: Posts (Atom)