Sat.28Sept2019
TO THE ABOVE NAMED, MINNESOTA,enbanc,CityMpls,CitySt.Paul enbanc,87 Countys,employees et al, Police,Sheriffs in Minnesota,Wisconsin et al
PLEASE NOTE OUR PRESIDENT USA DONALD TRUMP HAS NOT COMMITED
NO HIGH CRIMES,MISDEMEANORS OR TREASONABLE BEHAVIOR.
APPARANTLY DNC CHAIR TOM PEREZ ET AL HAVE.
SHARON HAS STANDING CANDIDATE WARD 2
https://www.ramseycounty.us/sites/default/files/Elections%20and%20Voting/Sample%20ballot%20-%20Saint%20Paul%20W-2%20P-1.pdf
SHARON HAS STANDING CANDIDATE WARD 2
https://www.ramseycounty.us/sites/default/files/Elections%20and%20Voting/Sample%20ballot%20-%20Saint%20Paul%20W-2%20P-1.pdf
https://www.westernjournal.com/soros-linked-whistleblower-report-former-us-attorney-finds-proof-buried-footnotes/?utm_source=Facebook&utm_medium=PostTopSharingButtons&utm_campaign=websitesharingbuttons&fbclid=IwAR0cUNgdHc13-b6iP4W3Lq4fVPAD5uV0vmEthhsTbLTdUBZYX8eeWIJcqDw
Top stories the ultra-wealthy Donald Trump is the one trying to bring down Soros and the rest of the elites’ burgeoning plutocracy — and those elites haven’t the foggiest idea of how to stop him.
AFFIDAVIT OF CURRENT CANDIDATE ST.PAUL CITY COUNCIL WARD 2
http://sharon4council.blogspot.com who is not a Liar or Lawyer.
This Legal Complaint also notify to all Police,Sheriffs, who risk their lives every day, now Sicko Statements by Lawyer Mayor Jacob Frey must be abated for the Safety, Security, of all Citizens of Minnesota, regardless of Party.
Sharon is Sick and Tired of Twincities Mayors Bashing President Donald Trump as a Person and his OFFICE OF PRESIDENT, Family,Supporters etc.
DEMAND MPLS MAYOR JACOB FREY and others APOLOGY IN WRITING. or Face Criminal Charges of Defamation,Abuse of Mayoral Office,Separation of Powers meaning Lawyers in the Executive,Legislative Branchs contrary to MN CONSTUTION Article III, Art. X Taxaction without Representation.
The fourth federal law, 18 U.S.C. 1918 provides penalties for violation of oath office described in 5 U.S.C. 7311 which include: (1) removal from
SharonAnderson aka Chergosky-Peterson 1st Husband Scarrella, current Valid Whistleblower re MN Real-Estate Corruption. titled Magner vs. Gallagher USSC 10-1032 Landlords started 2004- Federal Judge DFL Michael Davis could not and should not dismiss a RICO CRIMINAL Allegations https://www.nationalbcc.org/images/stories/DOJ-St-Paul.pdf
is of Russian-Jewish Frey moved to Minneapolis in 2009 to join law firm Faegre & Benson (now Faegre Baker Daniels) before moving to law firm Halunen & Associates.[8][9]
PO Box 583422 Minneapolis, MN 55458Jacob Frey
@Jacob_Frey
On October 10, our entire city will stand not behind the President, but behind the communities and people who continue to make our city – and this country – great.
Trumpy had every Right and Priviledge to request info on the Biden family involvment in the Burisma Gas Corruption Trumps DNC means Democratic National Committe and or DNChair Tom Perez, former VC Keith Ellison now MNAG current DNC VC is Ken Martin who's Wife Orourke works now in Ramsey County
Burisma, the Ukrainian gas company tied to Joe Biden's son, explained - Business Insider
A Ukrainian gas company called Burisma Holdings is at the center of a complicated scandal involving a whistleblower complaint that's been linked to President Donald Trump, Ukraine, former Vice President Joe Biden, and his son Hunter Biden.
HUD Sued for Records of Obama Administration Involvement in Controversial St. Paul, MN, Housing Discrimination Case | Judicial WatchPlease not USSC 10-1032 TITLED Magner vs. Gallagher
St. Paul, Ramsey County step up immigrant legal defense efforts Chris Tolbert Lawyer Hennepin Co Asst Attorney,St.Paul City Council, bashing Trump every chance he gets
A Ukrainian gas company called Burisma Holdings is at the center of a complicated scandal involving a whistleblower complaint that's been linked to President Donald Trump, Ukraine, former Vice President Joe Biden, and his son Hunter Biden.
US and other countries had pressured for Shokin to be ousted because he didn't make a concerted effort to fight corruption. Biden, who was spearheading the Obama administration's Ukraine work, was at the center of these efforts, and threatened to withhold $1 billion in loan guarantees from Ukraine if Shokin wasn't fired.
President Trump Brings Truth to the UN
CWA's General Counsel, Mario Diaz, Esq. wrote an article describing the importance of President Trump's announcement this week at the UN General Assembly.
"More than the inspiring speech, President Trump has put action behind every word he’s said on this topic … When he speaks in this manner, he truly speaks for all Americans. Religious freedom has always been a unifying force in our land, and we pray that it may spread around the world." |
HUD Sued for Records of Obama Administration Involvement in Controversial St. Paul, MN, Housing Discrimination Case | Judicial WatchPlease not USSC 10-1032 TITLED Magner vs. Gallagher
(Washington, DC) – Judicial Watch announced today that it filed a lawsuit (Judicial Watch, Inc. v. United States Department of Housing and Urban Development (No. 1:12-cv-01785)) on November 2, 2012, in the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia against the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) to force compliance with an April 4, 2012, Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) request for documents relating to possible collusion between the Obama administration and the city of St. Paul, MN, in withdrawing a “disparate impact” appeal pending before the U.S. Supreme Court. HUD has refused all JW FOIA requests for public records, even after JW paid in advance for the information.
The disparate impact case arose from a lawsuit by a St. Paul minority contractor claiming that the city’s targeted enforcement of the city’s housing code against rental units reduced the availability of low-income rentals, with a disparate impact upon African-Americans. The Eighth Circuit found in the contractor’s favor, after which the city appealed to the Supreme Court. Generally speaking, under a disparate impact analysis, an entity can be found to have engaged in discriminatory activity for practices that merely have a “disparate impact” on protected minorities, irrespective of any intentional bias.
The Obama DOJ then intervened, apparently persuading St. Paul to take the extraordinary step of withdrawing its cert petition from the Supreme Court docket. On February 13, the Wall Street Journalreported that various federal officials had asked the City of St. Paul to withdraw its petition for certiorari in a controversy that had already been slated for argument before the U.S. Supreme Court.
The Obama administration’s concern, explained the article, was that a legal theory known as “disparate impact” might either: 1) harden into law as used by the landlords who had won at the state level or 2) be eviscerated entirely. Apparently, several federal agencies that rely on that legal theory to secure out-of-court settlements in the consumer lending and family housing arena were reluctant to risk a change in the legal landscape. The next day, the parties to Magner v. Gallagher withdrew their case by mutual consent.
Judicial Watch separately obtained documents under the Minnesota Data Practices Act, showing that St. Paul City Attorney Sara Grewing arranged a meetingbetween the chief of DOJ’s Civil Rights Division, Tom Perez, and Mayor Chris Coleman a week before the city’s withdrawal from the case, captioned Magner v. Gallagher. Following Perez’s visit, the city withdrew its case and thanked DOJ and officials at HUD for their involvement.
On April 4, Judicial Watch sent a FOIA request to the DOJ and HUD seeking access to the following:
b. regarding “disparate impact” theory or analysis in the housing, landlord-tenant, or mortgage arena;
c. involving any member of the U.S. Senate’s Democratic Policy & Communications Committee, the House Democratic Caucus, or the White House, and their respective staffs; and,
d. involving third parties such as the National Low Income Housing Coalition, Thomas Goldstein, orWalter Mondale a
Covert Coverup of Asian St. Paul Councilman Dai Thao
The disparate impact case arose from a lawsuit by a St. Paul minority contractor claiming that the city’s targeted enforcement of the city’s housing code against rental units reduced the availability of low-income rentals, with a disparate impact upon African-Americans. The Eighth Circuit found in the contractor’s favor, after which the city appealed to the Supreme Court. Generally speaking, under a disparate impact analysis, an entity can be found to have engaged in discriminatory activity for practices that merely have a “disparate impact” on protected minorities, irrespective of any intentional bias.
The Obama DOJ then intervened, apparently persuading St. Paul to take the extraordinary step of withdrawing its cert petition from the Supreme Court docket. On February 13, the Wall Street Journalreported that various federal officials had asked the City of St. Paul to withdraw its petition for certiorari in a controversy that had already been slated for argument before the U.S. Supreme Court.
The Obama administration’s concern, explained the article, was that a legal theory known as “disparate impact” might either: 1) harden into law as used by the landlords who had won at the state level or 2) be eviscerated entirely. Apparently, several federal agencies that rely on that legal theory to secure out-of-court settlements in the consumer lending and family housing arena were reluctant to risk a change in the legal landscape. The next day, the parties to Magner v. Gallagher withdrew their case by mutual consent.
Judicial Watch separately obtained documents under the Minnesota Data Practices Act, showing that St. Paul City Attorney Sara Grewing arranged a meetingbetween the chief of DOJ’s Civil Rights Division, Tom Perez, and Mayor Chris Coleman a week before the city’s withdrawal from the case, captioned Magner v. Gallagher. Following Perez’s visit, the city withdrew its case and thanked DOJ and officials at HUD for their involvement.
On April 4, Judicial Watch sent a FOIA request to the DOJ and HUD seeking access to the following:
- All communications with or about St. Paul, Minnesota, its residents, landlords, low-income properties or employees, specifically those exchanges:
b. regarding “disparate impact” theory or analysis in the housing, landlord-tenant, or mortgage arena;
c. involving any member of the U.S. Senate’s Democratic Policy & Communications Committee, the House Democratic Caucus, or the White House, and their respective staffs; and,
d. involving third parties such as the National Low Income Housing Coalition, Thomas Goldstein, orWalter Mondale a
Covert Coverup of Asian St. Paul Councilman Dai Thao
Dec 17, 2015 - The city of St. Paul, Minnesota stood up Wednesday against 2016 Republican presidential contender Donald Trump. ... city council member Dai Thao wanted a resolution officially unwelcoming Trump from coming to St. Paul, .
Policy to ban all Muslims from coming to the U.S. Originally, city council member Dai Thao wanted a resolution officially unwelcoming Trump from coming to St. Paul, but some, including the editorial board of the Star Tribune, thought that went too far.
St. Paul, Ramsey County step up immigrant legal defense efforts Chris Tolbert Lawyer Hennepin Co Asst Attorney,St.Paul City Council, bashing Trump every chance he gets
will transpose Video another time
FURTHER AFFIANT SAYETH NOT AT THIS TIME
DULY CONCERN FOR THE LIFE,SAFETY,SECURITY OF ALL
CITIZENS OCT.10TH 2019 AT TARGET CENTER MPLS.
Sharon Anderson aka Scarrella 651-776-5835 sharon4anderson@aol.com
LEGAL NOTICE: /s/Sharon4Anderson@aol.com ECF_P165913Pacersa1299 telfx: 651-776-5835:
Attorney ProSe_InFact,Private Attorney General QuiTam Whistleblower, www.taxthemax.blogspot.com
The Electronic Communications Privacy Act, 18 U.S.C.
Ch.119 Sections 2510-2521 et seq., governs distribution of this "Message,"
including attachments, may contain the originator's
proprietary information. The originator hereby notifies
recipients Message review, dissemination, copying, and content-based
actions. Authorized carriers of this message
shall expeditiously deliver this Message to intended recipients. See: Quon
v. Arch
Attorney ProSe_InFact,Private Attorney General QuiTam Whistleblower, www.taxthemax.blogspot.com
The Electronic Communications Privacy Act, 18 U.S.C.
Ch.119 Sections 2510-2521 et seq., governs distribution of this "Message,"
including attachments, may contain the originator's
proprietary information. The originator hereby notifies
recipients Message review, dissemination, copying, and content-based
actions. Authorized carriers of this message
shall expeditiously deliver this Message to intended recipients. See: Quon
v. Arch
xx
