Monday, December 23, 2019

DearNancy,andSharonsChallengeCitySt.PaulDFLConsentAgenda'sExcessiveInspections,IllegalLevyPropertys4.5%interestUsury

Mon23Dec2019

Any Lawsuits may be reopened Frank working on mine/yours

re Housing scrool to Sig Filehttps://sharon4anderson.blogspot.com/

Bidens,Busuri,BadBehaviors

Go Trump re Ukraine Corruption, Witholding Funds4War while Major Ukraine Corruption is NOT IMPEACHABLE.

From: email@email.startribune.com
Reply-to: emailfeedback@startribune.com
To: sharon4anderson@aol.com
Sent: 12/23/2019 6:59:28 AM Central Standard Time
Subject: Lawsuits intensify concerns of 3M's liabilities over PFAS

If you're having trouble viewing this email, you may see it online.

MORNING UPDATE

Lawsuits intensify concerns of 3M's liabilities over PFAS
•	Saudi court sentences 5 to death for Jamal Khashoggi killing
•	Evangelical fight over anti-Trump editorial escalates
•	Firefighter dies trying to rescue brother, nephew from grain silo
•	U.S. House vote to lift federal tax deduction cap could be short-lived

LOCAL

•	Despite risk of physical and financial collapse, Twin Cities suburbs keep building sports domes
•	Part of historic Rochester hotel damaged in fire
•	Minnesota driver asks if she was overcharged for license tabs
•	Minnetonka man wrote exposé about Mormon church investment fund

BUSINESS

•	Retailer invests in upscale units at once-blighted Minneapolis corner
•	Immigrant restaurateur is expanding Los Ocampo on Lake Street in Minneapolis
•	Spyhouse Coffee's new president considers new cafes among growth options
•	Flight shame is real but it's not always effective at reducing climate impacts

SPORTS

•	Rodgers has Packers in first entering game with Vikings, but fans keep grumbling
•	A year after fight and injury, Wild's Dumba still not the same
•	Wolves deal with constant lineup juggling
•	Ryu, Blue Jays agree to $80 million, 4-year deal

OPINION

•	End the arms race or end the human race?
•	Vaccination inaction is dereliction of duty by U.S. Customs and Border Protection.
•	Make motherhood safer in rural America
•	Counterpoint: Use facts on marijuana? How about these

Connect with Star Tribune

Manage email preferences • Subscribe to Star Tribune • Privacy Policy • Unsubscribe

This email was sent by: StarTribune, 650 3rd Ave S, Suite #1300, Minneapolis, MN, 55488
© 2019 StarTribune. All rights reserved.
We value your opinion! Give us your feedback.

Sharon Anderson aka Scarrella 651-776-5835 sharon4anderson@aol.com

http://blogitbabe.blogspot.com http://sharon4council.blogspot.com

2019 2018 2017 2016

Estimated Market Value $57,500 $51,000 $43,700 $44,700

Taxable Market Value $46,000 $40,800 $35,000 $35,800

Net Tax Amount $629.72 $536.14 $447.46 $473.92

+ Special Assessments $1,230.28 $991.86 $308.54 $298.08

=

Total Taxes

$1,860.00

$1,528.00

Estimated Market Value	$57,500	$51,000	$43,700	$44,700
	Taxable Market Value	$46,000	$40,800	$35,000	$35,800

	Net Tax Amount	$629.72	$536.14	$447.46	$473.92
+	Special Assessments	$1,230.28	$991.86	$308.54	$298.08
=	Total Taxes	$1,860.00	$1,528.00

For Education to underst

and Sharons Fight with City on Bogus Illegal Excessive Inspections

. For all Senior Homeowners who do not know how to Theft of Sharons Car,Trailer even Porta Potty 10 yrs Hardship, fully licensed,insured etc. http://sharon4anderson.org orhttp://sharon4council.blogspot.com

Check their Propertys, Will use Sharons 697 Surrey as Example.

A. Go to co.ramsey.mn.us click onLook up basic property values and taxes

B. type in

	Parcel ID	Owner	Property Address
	322922410053	SHARON LEE ANDERSON	697 SURREY AVE

C. History of 697 Surrey
Beacon - Ramsey County, MN - Property Tax: 322922410053

Go to

Special Assessments

Note: + sign indicates a multiple year assessment. Click on the + to view additional years.

Assess #	Year	Description	Initial Amount	Installment Amount	Remaining Balance	Deferred
R-011999960	2019	2019 RECYCLING	$0.00	$58.20	$0.00	No

T-011800250	2019	2018 SMSP Sweeping and Lighting	$0.00	$41.44	$0.00	No

T-011800800	2019	2018 SSSC / Storm Sewer	$0.00	$98.06	$0.00	No

T-011883010	2019	T-011883010 EXCESSIVE INSPECTION	$0.00	$169.98	$0.00	No

T-011883020	2019	T-011883020 EXCESSIVE INSPECTION	$0.00	$169.74	$0.00	No

T-011883030	2019	T-011883030 Excessive Inspection	$0.00	$167.72	$0.00	No

T-011883040	2019	T-011883040 Excessive Inspection	$0.00	$167.28	$0.00	No

T-011883050	2019	T-011883050 Exceissive Inspection	$0.00	$166.84	$0.00	No

T-011883060	2019	T-011883060 Excessive Inspection	$0.00	$166.42	$0.00	No

T-011999970	2019	2019 SOLID WASTE	$0.00	$24.60	$0.00	No

Note: Installment amount is the amount that will be included in the property tax total for the referenced payable year.
Remaining Balance is the amount eligible for prepayment. Prepayment must be paid in full by November 15th of the current year.Please call the City of Saint Paul General Assessment line for payoff amounts or additional information concerning any Saint Paul assessment. You can reach them at 651-266-8858 or go to Assessment Lookup.

Note: Payments may not be processed after November 18, 2019 because the City must prepare the annual certification of assessments to property taxes. Payments received after that date will be returned.

Levied Assessments (due and payable)

Assessment Number	Improvement	Interest Rate	Levied Date	Term Years	Levied Amount	Balance Due
Levied Balance Due:						$0.00

Fees and Pending Assessments (Payments are accepted)

Project Number	Improvement	Pending Date	Term Years	Pending Amount
J2003E	Excessive Inspection or Abatement Service 05/22/19-06/21/19	8/1/2019	1	$157.00
J2004E	Excessive Inspection or Abatement Service 06/24/19-07/22/19	9/4/2019	1	$157.00
Pending Balance Due:				$314.00

Levied and Pending Balance (as of the date above): $314.00

For Informational Purposes Only: Anticipated Charges

The project information listed below is subject to change and does not necessarily reflect all charges that may be placed on the property. Amounts are estimates only. Payments are NOT accepted until a charge becomes pending.

For SMSP project details, see https://www.stpaul.gov/departments/financial-services/street-maintenance-service-program
For SSSC information, see https://www.stpaul.gov/departments/public-works/sewer-utility/storm-sewer-system-charge

Project Number	Improvement	Estimated Invoice Date	Estimated Amount
195600	2019 SMSP / Sealcoating Street and/or Alley	12/31/2019	$248.80

Make Payment via U.S. Mail or in person

Then go to Assessments Certified interest 4.5% and you wonder Why Sharon fights the City,s

City of Saint Paul
Assessments Certified to Property Taxes

Property Address:	697 SURREY AVE Select a different property
Property ID:	32-29-22-41-0053

The assessments listed below have been certified to Ramsey County to be collected with property taxes. Call Ramsey County at (651) 266-2000 to verify that the certified amounts remain due and payable.

If you have questions regarding an assessment, call Assessments at (651) 266-8858.

Assessments Payable with 2020 Property Taxes

(Only Payable to Ramsey County)

Assessment Number	Improvement	Interest Rate	Levied Date	Term Years	Levied Amount	Certified Amount
190025	2019 SMSP / Sweeping and Lighting	4.25 %	11/6/2019	1	$43.20	$45.04
190080	2019 SSSC / Storm Sewer	4.25 %	8/29/2019	1	$97.96	$102.12
198300	Excessive Inspection or Abatement Service 04/23/18-05/21/18	3.60 %	1/9/2019	1	$157.00	$168.16
198301	Excessive Inspection or Abatement Service 05/22/18-06/20/18	3.60 %	1/2/2019	1	$157.00	$168.28
198302	Excessive Inspection or Abatement Service 06/22/18-07/20/18	3.60 %	1/16/2019	1	$157.00	$168.06
198303	Excessive Inspection or Abatement Service 07/23/18-08/21/18	4.25 %	2/20/2019	1	$157.00	$169.42
198304	Excessive Inspection or Abatement Service 08/22/18-09/21/18	4.25 %	3/20/2019	1	$157.00	$168.90
198307	Excessive Inspection or Abatement Service 10/22/18-11/21/18	4.25 %	5/15/2019	1	$157.00	$167.88
209996	2020 Recycling	0.00 %	12/31/2019	1	$58.20	$58.20
209997	2020 Solid Waste	0.00 %	12/31/2019	1	$24.60	$24.60
Certified Total: 2019						$1,240.66

Estimated Market Value	$57,500	$51,000	$43,700	$44,700
	Taxable Market Value	$46,000	$40,800	$35,000	$35,800

	Net Tax Amount	$629.72	$536.14	$447.46	$473.92
+	Special Assessments	$1,230.28	$991.86	$308.54	$298.08
=

Ramsey County mailing address:
Ramsey County Property Records and Revenue PO Box 64097 Saint Paul, MN 55164-0097

Total Tax	$1,860.00	$1,528.0

City of Saint Paul Assessments

illegal Fee,Taxing to steal Propertys Sharon Reduced to Poverty HomeSted 1058 Summit Ave.St. Paul,MN TAKEN even tho Taxes were paid, to Tar Paper Shack on Buck Lake, then to 697 Surrey Ave St. Paul,MN now with Grandfathered in 2 layers of Shingles and 2 Tarpaper Brown and Black for Warmth,
Now Sharon Legally Blind, Senior, must fight Back Big Time

Bar Buzz: MacDonald says she will appeal two rulings – Minnesota Lawyer

Suburban property owners should call 651-266-2000 for detailed assessment information.

by Hany Ghoraba
Special to IPT News
December 23, 2019

https://www.investigativeproject.org/8227/egyptian-government-cracks-down-on-radical-schools

Egyptian Government Cracks Down on Radical Schools

LEGAL NOTICE: /s/Sharon4Anderson@aol.com ECF_P165913Pacersa1299 telfx: 651-776-5835:
Attorney ProSe_InFact,Private Attorney General QuiTam Whistleblower, www.taxthemax.blogspot.com
The Electronic Communications Privacy Act, 18 U.S.C.
Ch.119 Sections 2510-2521 et seq., governs distribution of this "Message,"
including attachments, may contain the originator's
proprietary information. The originator hereby notifies
recipients Message review, dissemination, copying, and content-based
actions. Authorized carriers of this message
shall expeditiously deliver this Message to intended recipients. See: Quon

SharonvsJusticeGildeaQuidProQuo

Sun20Oct2019 TO THE ABOVE NAMED;SERVICE ELECTRONICALLY,EMAIL,SOCIAL MEDIA AND BLOGS CRIMINAL ALLEGATIONS RICO RE QUID PRO QUO NO FILING FEE4WHISTLEBLOWER ATTORNEY PRO SE PRIVATE ATTORNEY GENERAL RE QUITAM STATE OF MINNESOTA IN SUPREME COURT A19-0916Minnesota Judicial Branch - BioChief Justice Lorie Skjerven GildeaSupreme CourtSend an email via our contact formState Court Administrator's Office(651) 296-2474 (phone)(651) 297-5636 (fax)Minnesota Judicial Center (MJC) Suite #: 13525 Rev. Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. Blvd.St. Paul, MN 55155 Sharon Anderson Ward 2 QuiTam Relator White,Widow,WhistleblowerName: Sharon AndersonPublic Office Sought: Saint Paul City Council Email: Sharon4Anderson@aol.comPhone: 651-776-5835Website: sharon4council.blogspot.comTwitter Handle: @sharon4andersonFacebook: Sharon Anderson2019 Saint paul Voter Guide City St.Paul QuidProQuo unabated by Chief Justice Lorie Gildea QUESTIONS 1. Citys Trash/Garbarge Contract 11Nov2017 techinally must be voided, basedon Asst. City Attorney Rachael Tierney, Sarah Grewing, then and today giving legal Advise to past and present Council to Malign, usurp City Charter, triggeHouse Committee on Oversight and Government Reformrs Ineffective Assistance of City Council's Resolutions Ord 18-39 further Quid Pro Quo. VoteNo Save our Charter. 2. Has Chief Justice Lorie S.Gildea Covertly by Published Order indirectly,directlOPA190916-101619.pd pg 3 further over 6,000 signed signatures mandates Investigations over and above the 5Nov2019 Ballot and Elections. a. City Attorneys simulating legal process's for Citys Pecuniary Gain.? Cash Cow 4 Lawyers.Quid Pro QuoAlmanac - Twin Cities PBS .ATTY GENERAL ELLISON, ST PAUL TRASH FIGHT, DAYTON’S PORTRAITMN Attorney General Ellison, Hazelden’s Mark Mishek, Former Gov Dayton portrait More 3. Legal Notice re Separation of Powers, the Landlord Case and now Trash Casewithout MN Attorney General Mike Hatch,Lory Swanson and now Current MNAG Keith Ellison, intervention to Protect the State Laws, Constitution State and Federal as mentioned, 4. Has Justice Lorie Gildea in her Official Capacity looked the other way on other Lawsuits vs. City St. Paul, specifically USSC10-1032 Titled Magner vs. GallagherHouse Committee on Oversight and Government Reform The quid pro quo between the Department of Justice and the City of St. Paul, Minnesota, is largely the result of the machinations of one man: Assistant Attorney General Thomas Perez. Yet the consequences of his actions will negatively affect not only Fredrick Newell and the lowincome residents of St. Paul who he championed. The effects of this quid pro quo will be felt by future whistleblowers who act courageously, and often at great personal risk, to fight fraud and identify waste on behalf of federal taxpayers. The effects of withdrawing Magner will be felt by the minority tenants in St. Paul who, due to the case’s challenge to the City’s housing code, continue to live with rampant rodent infestations and inadequate plumbing. The effects of sacrificing Newell’s case will cost American taxpayers the opportunity to recover up to $200 million and allow St. Paul’s misdeeds to go unpunished. Far more troubling, however, is the fundamental damage that this quid pro quo has done to the rule of law in the United States and to the reputation of the Department of Justice as a fair and impartial arbiter of justice 5, Has Chief Justice Lorie Gildea overreached her Personal and Official Duties, re; Committment Panel is Cap knowing appointment of members ie Knutson,Gearin,Smith,Metzen,Asphaug, etal knowing Public Distaste,Distrust of these Judges b. 59 yr Restraining Orders, Restraint of Free Speech, by Gearin Ordering Web Sites taken down or Criminal Charges. BIZZARE. see Memorandum below. re Dede Evavald, Sharon Anderson re Concern Darlene Winters Trust Acct. Sandra Grazzini et alOpinions-Unpublished?Archives https://opinions-unpublished.blogspot.com/2013/Sharons-CourtRecords: In the Matter Darlene WinterPO62-14-696_HS1113StPaulAveElmer MackSocWorker postconviction court’s factual findings, not only does the majority depart from our precedent, but it also places Minnesota out of step with courts across the country. See, e.g., Bennett v. United States, 663 F.3d 71, 85 (2d Cir. 2011) (explaining that its deference to the findings made by district court in the course of deciding an ineffectiveness claim reflected “the superiority of the trial judge’s position to make determinations of credibility since only the trial judge can be aware of the variations in demeanor and tone of voice that bear so heavily on the listener’s understanding of and belief in what is said” (citation omitted) (internal quotation marked omitted)); Ahmed v. Redman, 782 F.2d 409, 412 (3d Cir. 1986) (explaining that the statutory presumption of correctness attaches to the subsidiary findings of historical fact that are relevant to the resolution of mixed questions of fact and law raised by a claim of ineffective assistance of counsel); United States v. Auerbach, 745 F.2d 1157, 1161 (8th Cir. 1984) (explaining that, “[w]e will affirm a district court’s finding that a habeas petitioner was denied effective assistance of counsel where the district court’s findings of fact which support the conclusion of law are not clearly erroneous”); Gaines v. Comm’r of Corr., 51 A.3d 948, 959-60, 966 (Conn. 2012) (explaining that the postconviction Complaints vs. Justice Lorie Gildea Lorie Skjerven Gildea - Wikipedia Because of Gildea's discrimination to favor women, the men have been left homeless, destroyed livelihoods, forced into squalor, and, most importantly, damaged their families. Gildea has condoned these smear campaigns that are OPA091641-0531.pdfused to prevent the men from speaking. postconviction court’s factual findings, not only does the majority depart from our precedent, but it also places Minnesota out of step with courts across the country. See, e.g., Bennett v. United States, 663 F.3d 71, 85 (2d Cir. 2011) (explaining that its deference to the findings made by district court in the course of deciding an ineffectiveness claim reflected “the superiority of the trial judge’s position to make determinations of credibility since only the trial judge can be aware of the variations in demeanor and tone of voice that bear so heavily on the listener’s understanding of and belief in what is said” (citation omitted) (internal quotation marked omitted)); Ahmed v. Redman, 782 F.2d 409, 412 (3d Cir. 1986) (explaining that the statutory presumption of correctness attaches to the subsidiary findings of historical fact that are relevant to the resolution of mixed questions of fact and law raised by a claim of ineffective assistance of counsel); United States v. Auerbach, 745 F.2d 1157, 1161 (8th Cir. 1984) (explaining that, “[w]e will affirm a district court’s finding that a habeas petitioner was denied effective assistance of counsel where the district court’s findings of fact which support the conclusion of law are not clearly erroneous”); Gaines v. Comm’r of Corr., 51 A.3d 948, 959-60, 966 (Conn. 2012) (explaining that the postconviction OPINIONS OF THESUPREME COURTFILED WEDNESDAY, OCTOBER 16, 2019NOTICE - MEDIA RELEASE TIME IS 10:00 A.M.A19-0916 Bruce Clark, et al., Respondents, vs. City of Saint Paul, et al., Appellants. Ramsey County. 1. A referendum on a Saint Paul ordinance that establishes organized waste collection services does not conflict with the requirements in Minn. Stat. §§ 115A.94–.941 (2018), that municipalities ensure that residents have waste collection services including through appropriate local controls, because ordinances that are not subject to the referendum fulfill those requirements and the Legislature intended that municipalities have broad authority in the process for establishing organized waste collection. 2. A referendum on an ordinance that establishes organized waste collection services in the City does not impair the City’s contract obligations under the Contract Clauses of the United States and Minnesota Constitutions. Affirmed. Chief Justice Lorie S. Gildea.OPA190916-101619.pdfA18-0121 Ambree Getz, Respondent, vs. Eila Kaarina Peace, et al., Appellants. Court of Appeals.Email Please note: your email will become part of the public record. Phone: 651-266-8560Fax: 651-266-8574Dai Thao, Ward 1 | Jane L. Prince, Ward 7 | Chris Tolbert, Ward 3 | Amy Brendmoen, Ward 5 and Council President | Kassim Busuri, Ward 6| Mitra Jalali Nelson, Ward 4 | Rebecca Noecker, Ward 2Coordinated Collection | Saint Paul, Minnesota City Attorney | Saint Paul, MinnesotaCoordinated Collection | Saint Paul, MinnesotaThis contract provides a solid base to transition the city to Coordinated Collection and meets the priorities that the Council laid out for the negotiating team. See Final Contract, Final Contract Exhibits, and First Amendment.52 Organizer Ramac Franklin OrganizePageRight-click here to select Foth Office Search | Saint Paul, Minnesota| Code of Ordinances | St. Paul, MN | Municode LibrarySec. 14.01. - Power to levy assessments.Sec. 14.01.1. - Preliminary assessment.Sec. 14.01.2. - Charge for services.Sec. 14.01.3. - Reassessment.Sec. 14.01.4. - Appeal.Sec. 14.01.5. - Trial.Sec. 14.01.6. - Collection.Sec. 14.02. - Special assessment—Alternative procedure.City of Saint Paul - Meeting of City Council on 10/23/2019 at 3:30 PMRES 19-186417Authorizing the City of Saint Paul to enter into an agreement with the Minnesota Department of Revenue for the collection of Local Sales, Use Tax, and a Lodging Tax.ResolutionAuthorizing the City of Saint Paul to enter into an agreement with the Minnesota Department of Revenue for the collection of Local Sales, Use Tax, and a Lodging Tax.Ord 19-67117OrdinanceAmending section 220.05 of the Legislative Code to set rates for base level garbage service to be effective January 1, 2020.Businesses | Minnesota Department of RevenueAlcoholic Beverage TaxCigarette and Tobacco TaxesCorporation Franchise TaxEnergy Production TaxesEnvironmental Taxes and FeesEstate TaxFiduciary TaxGambling TaxesInsurance TaxesMining and Mineral Taxes MinnesotaCare TaxesMortgage Registry and Deed TaxPartnership TaxPetroleum TaxProperty TaxesS Corporation TaxSales and Use TaxUnrelated Business Income TaxWithholding Taxxx DetailsReportsFile #:Ord 19-67 Version: 1Name:Type:OrdinanceStatus:Second ReadingIn control:City CouncilFinal action:Title:Amending section 220.05 of the Legislative Code to set rates for base level garbage service to be effective January 1, 2020.Sponsors:Amy BrendmoenHistory (1)TextPublic Comments (2) Add New Comment2 recordsGroupExportDate NameDistrictOpinionCommentAction10/17/2019 6:51 PMCandidateSharonAndersonAgainstPlease read http://sharons-fraudupdate.blogspot.comForensic Files http://sharon4anderson.orgViolation of Charter,Ballot Vote No now Rate Setting Ponzi Taxing Scheme10/17/2019 10:24 AMCandidateSharonAndersonAgainstFor years Council has set Rates for NonProfit District Heating, now setting Rates for Trash a for Profit Business creates Contract Impairment, contrary to Private Citizens to do Business http://taxthemax.blogspot.comtherefore creating a Monoply,AntiTrustxxIN RE: Vanessa Yolanda REW | FindLaw Thomas A. Gilligan, Jr., Murnane Brandt, Saint Paul, MN, for respondent. James Allen Bergstrom, Roseville, MN, pro se. Lori Swanson, Attorney General, Alan I. Gilbert, Solicitor General, Michael Everson, Assistant Attorney General, Saint Paul, MN, for amicus curiae Minnesota Attorney General MEMORANDUM JUSTICE LORIE GILDEA'S50yrRestraining Orders 2019 - The Provocateurhttp://theeprovocateur.blogspot.com/2019/theeprovocateur.blogspot.com › ...The Minnesota Supreme Court, led by Judge Lorie Gildea, has to twist itself into ..... granted David Rucki a fifty (50) year restraining order against Dede Evavold. Now What Sharons latest http://sharonvcitystpaul.blogspot.com and http://citizenery-mncourts.blogspot.com651) 291-5297 (CAP) is defined by Minn. Stat. § 253B.19. Panel One - Judge AsphaugPanel Two - Judge RancourtPanel Three – Judge TilsenMinnesota Judicial Branch - Clerk of Appellate Courts Fri.18Oct2019 Tracking Opinions via Justice Lori GildeaMinnesota Judicial Branch - Clerk of Appellate CourtsBlogItBabeSandraGrazzini-Rucki,Pauper,ChildSupportviaJusticeLorieGildeahttps://theeprovocateur.blogspot.com/2019/09/sandra-grazzini-rucki-pauper-who-should.ht Just a Note re Kathleen Gearin Tolbert served as a law clerk for Ramsey County Chief Judge Kathleen Gearin, and then became an assistant attorney for Hennepin County. Other experience includes serving on the League of Minnesota Cities Board ofhttps://www.slideshare.net/Sharon4Anderson/affidavit-prejudicejudge-kathleen-gearinhttps://www.documentcloud.org/documents/4417581-19AVCV171950Order03212018.html re Dede EvavaldThursday, September 26, 2019Sandra Grazzini-Rucki, A Pauper Who Should Pay Child SupportThe Provocateur: Sandra Grazzini-Rucki, A Pauper Who Should Pay Child Supporthttps://theeprovocateur.blogspot.com/2019/09/sandra-grazzini-rucki-pauper-who-should.html?fbclid=IwAR2jTKIsegFHNzLh-mS5anl14m5aNneGU2cgYPTpZREsNTcVSqxZhDF52pcSharon Anderson aka Scarrella 651-776-5835 sharon4anderson@aol.comhttp://blogitbabe.blogspot.com http://sharon4council.blogspot.comLEGAL NOTICE: /s/Sharon4Anderson@aol.com ECF_P165913Pacersa1299 telfx: 651-776-5835:Attorney ProSe_InFact,Private Attorney General QuiTam Whistleblower, www.taxthemax.blogspot.com The Electronic Communications Privacy Act, 18 U.S.C. Ch.119 Sections 2510-2521 et seq., governs distribution of this "Message," including attachments, may contain the originator'sproprietary information. The originator hereby notifiesrecipients Message review, dissemination, copying, and content-based actions. Authorized carriers of this message shall expeditiously deliver this Message to intended recipients. See: Quon v. Arch

Monday, December 23, 2019

MORNING UPDATE

LOCAL

BUSINESS

SPORTS

OPINION

2019 2018 2017 2016 Estimated Market Value$57,500$51,000$43,700$44,700 Taxable Market Value$46,000$40,800$35,000$35,800 Net Tax Amount$629.72$536.14$447.46$473.92 +Special Assessments$1,230.28$991.86$308.54$298.08 = Total Taxes $1,860.00 $1,528.00

=

Total Taxes

$1,860.00

$1,528.00

Estimated Market Value

$57,500

$51,000

$43,700

$44,700

Taxable Market Value

$46,000

$40,800

$35,000

$35,800

Net Tax Amount

$629.72

$536.14

$447.46

$473.92

+

Special Assessments

$1,230.28

$991.86

$308.54

$298.08

$1,860.00

$1,528.0

Egyptian Government Cracks Down on Radical Schools

2019 2018 2017 2016

Estimated Market Value $57,500 $51,000 $43,700 $44,700

Taxable Market Value $46,000 $40,800 $35,000 $35,800

Net Tax Amount $629.72 $536.14 $447.46 $473.92

+ Special Assessments $1,230.28 $991.86 $308.54 $298.08

=

Total Taxes

$1,860.00

$1,528.00