Thursday, November 24, 2011

MITCH ALBOM'S HAVE A LITTLE FAITH - Christian Movie Review

MITCH ALBOM'S HAVE A LITTLE FAITH - Christian Movie Review
Have a Great ThanksGiving Day Beautiful Day

Monday, November 21, 2011

In St. Paul, home values down but property tax increases are all over the map - TwinCities.com

In St. Paul, home values down but property tax increases are all over the map

By Frederick Melo
fmelo@pioneerpress.com

Updated: 11/20/2011 11:49:02 PM CST

If your home's market value slips, your property taxes go down accordingly, right?

In a word: no.

Homeowners in 10 of St. Paul's 17 planning districts will, on average, see their property taxes rise next year even though their home values are going down.

With home values sliding at different rates in different neighborhoods, some homeowners will be asked to cough up more money than ever, while others will get some tax relief.

The trend is exacerbated by the fact that cash-strapped municipalities are increasing tax levies to make up for cuts in state aid. Taxes are going up overall, though not for everybody.

Here's a third major factor: A new instant credit of sorts allows owners of lower-valued homes to reduce their taxable value by up to $30,000 when calculating taxes. That exclusion is no longer paid for by the state, and cities will have to shift tax burdens from shabbier homes to finer ones to reap the same money.

For instance, in the Merriam Park/Snelling/Lexington/Hamline district, where homes have held their value relatively well, a homeowner with a median-value home will pay 9.1 percent more - an extra $320 - in overall property taxes next year to the city, county and other taxing jurisdictions.

By comparison, for the median-value homeowner in the Payne-Phalen neighborhood, taxes fall about 6.6 percent, due in large part to a dramatic 32 percent decrease in taxable market value.

That 32 percent drop is not all due to sliding home values.

The state's new Homestead Market Value Exclusion allows the owner to exclude 40 percent of the property's first $76,000 in home value. That adds up to a maximum exclusion of just over $30,000.

The exclusion decreases for homes valued above $76,000, and disappears entirely for homes valued above $413,000.

"Those Merriam Park, Snelling, Lexington, Hamline folks are higher up in home values, and it means they don't get as much of a reduction from the Homestead Market Value Exclusion," said Chris Samuel, Ramsey County manager of property records and revenue.

A HUNGRY GORILLA

Proponents of the new Homestead exclusion call it badly needed relief for residents in lower-valued properties who may be in danger of foreclosure, but some critics believe property-tax relief should be based on income, rather than home value.

With cities and counties hit by cuts in state aid, a number of taxing authorities have proposed increasing their tax levies, the total amount of property taxes collected from property owners.

Levies and budgets are finalized in December. Barring last-minute changes, St. Paul's 2012 tax levy will increase 6.5 percent over 2011 to reach $100.76 million, the St. Paul School District's tax levy is increasing 3.6 percent to $126 million, and Ramsey County's tax levy is rising 1.7 percent to $271.79 million.

The Metropolitan Council's proposed 2012 property tax levy is $77.7 million, an increase of 3 percent (or $2.3 million) over 2011. The council is debating lowering the increase to 2 percent before the levy is adopted Dec. 14.

The Ramsey County Regional Rail Authority, the St. Paul Port Authority and the St. Paul Housing and Redevelopment Authority are not increasing their tax levies for 2012.

What's this mean for the typical St. Paul homeowner? The answer is what you pay largely varies by where you live. That's because tax levies are like a big stew being prepared for a hungry gorilla.

Even if the amount of stew stays the same or increases only slightly, one cook (or homeowner) contributing fewer ingredients (or taxes) to the stew forces the next cook to contribute more.

When one homeowner's home value slides dramatically and his or her property taxes drop, someone else whose home value slid less dramatically has to contribute more.

WHERE THE SLIDE IS LESS DRAMATIC

In the Merriam Park/Snelling/Lexington/Hamline district, the market value of a median-value house is expected to drop 8.9 percent next year, from $247,400 to $227,500.

Instead of dropping in step, annual property taxes will increase more than 9 percent for that house, from $3,523 to $3,843. That's an overall tax increase of $320, the largest percentage increase and second-largest dollar increase in the city.

"To the extent that most of the other areas are decreasing in value faster than the Merriam Park area, Merriam Park homes are holding their value much better, so they're a larger share of the tax base," Samuel said. "Their taxes increase as a result of that."

Along a similar vein, Summit Hill homeowners will see property values drop 5.7 percent, but taxes increase 8.2 percent, or $412. Those who live in the Macalester-Groveland neighborhood will notice property values drop almost 9 percent, but their taxes go up 7.4 percent, or about $276.

The Highland, Como and Hamline-Midway neighborhoods will also experience noticeable tax increases of 7.8 percent, 6.9 percent and 5.2 percent, respectively.

'HOUSE VALUE IS RELATIVE'

At the other end of the spectrum, property taxes will drop in seven planning districts, none more so than the Payne-Phalen neighborhood. After the Homestead Market Value Exclusion is applied, market values there are tumbling more than 32 percent, the median home falling from $116,700 to $79,100.

As a result, property taxes for that house will go from $1,465 to $1,369, a decrease of $96, or 6.6 percent, the largest percentage and dollar decrease in the city.

In the Thomas-Dale neighborhood, where market values are poised to tumble 36 percent to just under $62,000 after the exclusion, property taxes would be $1,079, instead of $1,147 at the median. That's a drop of $68, or 5.9 percent.

John Mannillo, a downtown developer and Highland Park resident who ran unsuccessfully for St. Paul City Council, notes property taxes rose 7.8 percent in the neighborhood where he lives, despite an 8.7 percent drop in the median market value.

"Yeah, Highland Park is shouldering a greater burden," he said. "I talk about it more than most people. They don't understand why, if their house values go down, they still have to pay more taxes. Well, the bills aren't going down for the city. And your house value is relative to other homes."

Ramsey County sent out "Truth in Taxation" statements Friday, and they should arrive at residents' doors any day. The statements provide an overview of all the property taxes the homeowner will likely pay if proposed tax levies are adopted as expected by Dec. 14.

Frederick Melo can be reached at 651-228-2172.

TAX HEARINGS

Ramsey County will have a public budget and property tax hearing at 6:30 p.m. Nov. 28 at Roseville Area High School. The city of St. Paul will hold its own budget and tax hearing at 6 p.m. Dec. 7 at City Hall.

ON THE WEB

Ramsey County property and taxes: co.ramsey.mn.us/prr

City of St. Paul 2012 budget: 1.usa.gov/SPbudgetinfo

Font Resize

Sharon Anderson · St. Paul Central

http://www.scotusblog.com/case-files/cases/magner-v-gallagher

/ Read the Briefs Sharon tried to bring this out in the last Election CitySt.Pauls_Ponzi Schemes ROW Fees must be constitutionally challanged. Currently Sharon Claim with City for Theft of her Car etc. Defendants Answer due. Sharon is in 2013 Forclosure caused by Theft, Trespass, Treason of City Officials. www.taxthemax.blogspot.com

Forensic Files at www.sharon4anderson.org Reality 4 St.Paul is Coming http://www.angelfire.com/planet/andersonadvocates/PDFedem2006/file4.pdf.

Reply · Like
· Unfollow Post · 3 hours ago

LEGAL NOTICE: /s/Sharon4Anderson@aol.com ECF_P165913Pacersa1299 telfx: 651-776-5835:
Attorney ProSe_InFact,Private Attorney General QuiTam Whistleblower, www.taxthemax.blogspot.com
The Electronic Communications Privacy Act, 18 U.S.C.
Ch.119 Sections 2510-2521 et seq., governs distribution of this "Message,"
including attachments, may contain the originator's
proprietary information. The originator hereby notifies
recipients Message review, dissemination, copying, and content-based
actions. Authorized carriers of this message
shall expeditiously deliver this Message to intended recipients. See: Quon
v. Arch. IMPORTANT DISCLAIMER
This site is for educational purposes only, dedicated to promoting political speech protected by the First Amendment. As you can imagine, we receive thousands of stories and requests for input from consumers all across the country. Given the sheer volume, we cannot respond to all inquiries. This site is dedicated to serving and protecting homeowners and restoring the integrity of our court systems. This site is for educational purposes only. The purposes of this website is to share information and knowledge and to advance fundamental Constitutional rights especially the First Amendment.

Friday, November 18, 2011

Sharon vs.CitySt.Paul_GrandJury Demand 2011

1058 Summit Ave St.Paul,MN Sharon and her Disabled Marine
husband were "kicked" 1988 out even tho NO Mortgage and Taxes
were paid on a Non Homestead Basis_ Andersons_Tenants in
Common Petersons were Denied Due Process.
Flipping for 20 years by the Lesbian Judge's Kathleen Gearin et al
http://www.angelfire.com/planet/andersonadvocates/PDFedem2006/file4.pdf
Thurs.17Nov2011

ON THE GRAVES OF OUR HERITAGE: SHARONS TENANTS IN COMMON DAD 1STR.Wm. O Peterson re: 1058 Summit_PO Box 4384 St.Paul,MN
ISSUES:
(1) HUD REGULATIONS_USSC:10-1032 CitySt.Paul _Magner who lives in Stillwater

(2) CONSTITUTIONALITY WARD 2 EleCTION re: SharonScarrellaAnderson vs. CitySt.Paul et al and Dave Thune.

(3) Cop Corruption re: Metro Gang Strike Force Settlement.

Legal Notice to State of Minnesota via Hon.Gub. Mark Dayton,Attorney General Lori Swanson http://www.ag.state.mn.us/ , http://ag.state.nv.us/newsroom/press/2011/Indictment.pdf

Sample Indictment of Nevada AG, Lori Swanson has wilfully ignored the Constitution and Laws of the USA and Minnesota. http://www.barden4ag.com/

All Agencies,Political Subdivisions ie: 87 Countys specifically Ramsey Co. Attorney John Choi et al. Citys specifically http://www.ci.stpaul.mn.us/ Mayor Chris Coleman et al, Council,Attorneys et al, Municipalities,Townships,SchoolBoards etc.

AFFIDAVIT OF SHARON ANDERSON CANDIDATE JUSTICE/SENATE64 2012

Re: Penalitys of Perjury affiant Sharon a VA Widow has been reduced to Poverty, "taking" all RealEstate_Water_Cars_Trailers_Personal Property even her Right to Vote in a pdf format. contrary to 42USC 3631 and Title 18

Wednesday, November 16, 2011 http://lenderscompliance.blogspot.com/

COUNT I Hud

The Empire Strikes Back: HUD's Fair Lending Standards

On November 16, 2011, the Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) issued a proposal, entitled Implementation of the Fair Housing Act's Discriminatory Effects Standard. Comments from the public are due by January 17, 2012.

COUNT II

More videos for metro gang strike force settlement »

COUNT III Title 18 Forensic Files http://www.sharon4anderson.org/

The Empire Strikes Back: HUD's Fair Lending Standards

Introduction To Federal Voting Rights Laws Before the Voting Rights Act The Voting Rights Act of 1965 The Effect of the Voting Rights Act

The Voting Rights Act of 1965

LEGAL NOTICE: /s/Sharon4Anderson@aol.com ECF_P165913Pacersa1299 telfx: 651-776-5835:
Attorney ProSe_InFact,Private Attorney General QuiTam Whistleblower, http://www.blogger.com/profile/17187848282847569592
The Electronic Communications Privacy Act, 18 U.S.C.
Ch.119 Sections 2510-2521 et seq., governs distribution of this "Message,"
including attachments, may contain the originator's
proprietary information. The originator hereby notifies
recipients Message review, dissemination, copying, and content-based
actions. Authorized carriers of this message
shall expeditiously deliver this Message to intended recipients. See: Quon
v. Arch. IMPORTANT DISCLAIMER
This site is for educational purposes only, dedicated to promoting political speech protected by the First Amendment. As you can imagine, we receive thousands of stories and requests for input from consumers all across the country. Given the sheer volume, we cannot respond to all inquiries. This site is dedicated to serving and protecting homeowners and restoring the integrity of our court systems. This site is for educational purposes only. The purposes of this website is to share information and knowledge and to advance fundamental Constitutional rights especially the First Amendment.

Wednesday, November 2, 2011

Sharon_CitySt.Paul_USSC:10-1032_Magner

Wed. 2Nov2011

Affidavit of Sharon Anderson Candidate Ward2 from her

Legal Homesteaded Residence at 1058 Summit Ave St.Paul,MN

http://www.angelfire.com/mn3/andersonadvocates/2006water/PDFcases/sharoncases.pdf

QUESTIONS:

Pending USSC: 10-1032 Magner v. Gallagher_ Is the City arbitrarily forcing illegal "Ordinances" Ratifications pending this Law Suit?

Click here: City of Saint Paul - Meeting of City Council on 11/2/2011 at 3:30 PM

http://stpaul.legistar.com/Calendar.aspx

Magner v. GallagherPending petition 6th Conference to be heard Fri.4Nov2011

Docket No.	Op. Below	Argument	Opinion	Vote	Author	Term
10-1032	8th Cir.	TBD	TBD	TBD		TBD

Issue: (1) Whether disparate impact claims are cognizable under the Fair Housing Act; and, if so (2) what test should be used to analyze them.

SharonvsJusticeGildeaQuidProQuo

Sun20Oct2019 TO THE ABOVE NAMED;SERVICE ELECTRONICALLY,EMAIL,SOCIAL MEDIA AND BLOGS CRIMINAL ALLEGATIONS RICO RE QUID PRO QUO NO FILING FEE4WHISTLEBLOWER ATTORNEY PRO SE PRIVATE ATTORNEY GENERAL RE QUITAM STATE OF MINNESOTA IN SUPREME COURT A19-0916Minnesota Judicial Branch - BioChief Justice Lorie Skjerven GildeaSupreme CourtSend an email via our contact formState Court Administrator's Office(651) 296-2474 (phone)(651) 297-5636 (fax)Minnesota Judicial Center (MJC) Suite #: 13525 Rev. Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. Blvd.St. Paul, MN 55155 Sharon Anderson Ward 2 QuiTam Relator White,Widow,WhistleblowerName: Sharon AndersonPublic Office Sought: Saint Paul City Council Email: Sharon4Anderson@aol.comPhone: 651-776-5835Website: sharon4council.blogspot.comTwitter Handle: @sharon4andersonFacebook: Sharon Anderson2019 Saint paul Voter Guide City St.Paul QuidProQuo unabated by Chief Justice Lorie Gildea QUESTIONS 1. Citys Trash/Garbarge Contract 11Nov2017 techinally must be voided, basedon Asst. City Attorney Rachael Tierney, Sarah Grewing, then and today giving legal Advise to past and present Council to Malign, usurp City Charter, triggeHouse Committee on Oversight and Government Reformrs Ineffective Assistance of City Council's Resolutions Ord 18-39 further Quid Pro Quo. VoteNo Save our Charter. 2. Has Chief Justice Lorie S.Gildea Covertly by Published Order indirectly,directlOPA190916-101619.pd pg 3 further over 6,000 signed signatures mandates Investigations over and above the 5Nov2019 Ballot and Elections. a. City Attorneys simulating legal process's for Citys Pecuniary Gain.? Cash Cow 4 Lawyers.Quid Pro QuoAlmanac - Twin Cities PBS .ATTY GENERAL ELLISON, ST PAUL TRASH FIGHT, DAYTON’S PORTRAITMN Attorney General Ellison, Hazelden’s Mark Mishek, Former Gov Dayton portrait More 3. Legal Notice re Separation of Powers, the Landlord Case and now Trash Casewithout MN Attorney General Mike Hatch,Lory Swanson and now Current MNAG Keith Ellison, intervention to Protect the State Laws, Constitution State and Federal as mentioned, 4. Has Justice Lorie Gildea in her Official Capacity looked the other way on other Lawsuits vs. City St. Paul, specifically USSC10-1032 Titled Magner vs. GallagherHouse Committee on Oversight and Government Reform The quid pro quo between the Department of Justice and the City of St. Paul, Minnesota, is largely the result of the machinations of one man: Assistant Attorney General Thomas Perez. Yet the consequences of his actions will negatively affect not only Fredrick Newell and the lowincome residents of St. Paul who he championed. The effects of this quid pro quo will be felt by future whistleblowers who act courageously, and often at great personal risk, to fight fraud and identify waste on behalf of federal taxpayers. The effects of withdrawing Magner will be felt by the minority tenants in St. Paul who, due to the case’s challenge to the City’s housing code, continue to live with rampant rodent infestations and inadequate plumbing. The effects of sacrificing Newell’s case will cost American taxpayers the opportunity to recover up to $200 million and allow St. Paul’s misdeeds to go unpunished. Far more troubling, however, is the fundamental damage that this quid pro quo has done to the rule of law in the United States and to the reputation of the Department of Justice as a fair and impartial arbiter of justice 5, Has Chief Justice Lorie Gildea overreached her Personal and Official Duties, re; Committment Panel is Cap knowing appointment of members ie Knutson,Gearin,Smith,Metzen,Asphaug, etal knowing Public Distaste,Distrust of these Judges b. 59 yr Restraining Orders, Restraint of Free Speech, by Gearin Ordering Web Sites taken down or Criminal Charges. BIZZARE. see Memorandum below. re Dede Evavald, Sharon Anderson re Concern Darlene Winters Trust Acct. Sandra Grazzini et alOpinions-Unpublished?Archives https://opinions-unpublished.blogspot.com/2013/Sharons-CourtRecords: In the Matter Darlene WinterPO62-14-696_HS1113StPaulAveElmer MackSocWorker postconviction court’s factual findings, not only does the majority depart from our precedent, but it also places Minnesota out of step with courts across the country. See, e.g., Bennett v. United States, 663 F.3d 71, 85 (2d Cir. 2011) (explaining that its deference to the findings made by district court in the course of deciding an ineffectiveness claim reflected “the superiority of the trial judge’s position to make determinations of credibility since only the trial judge can be aware of the variations in demeanor and tone of voice that bear so heavily on the listener’s understanding of and belief in what is said” (citation omitted) (internal quotation marked omitted)); Ahmed v. Redman, 782 F.2d 409, 412 (3d Cir. 1986) (explaining that the statutory presumption of correctness attaches to the subsidiary findings of historical fact that are relevant to the resolution of mixed questions of fact and law raised by a claim of ineffective assistance of counsel); United States v. Auerbach, 745 F.2d 1157, 1161 (8th Cir. 1984) (explaining that, “[w]e will affirm a district court’s finding that a habeas petitioner was denied effective assistance of counsel where the district court’s findings of fact which support the conclusion of law are not clearly erroneous”); Gaines v. Comm’r of Corr., 51 A.3d 948, 959-60, 966 (Conn. 2012) (explaining that the postconviction Complaints vs. Justice Lorie Gildea Lorie Skjerven Gildea - Wikipedia Because of Gildea's discrimination to favor women, the men have been left homeless, destroyed livelihoods, forced into squalor, and, most importantly, damaged their families. Gildea has condoned these smear campaigns that are OPA091641-0531.pdfused to prevent the men from speaking. postconviction court’s factual findings, not only does the majority depart from our precedent, but it also places Minnesota out of step with courts across the country. See, e.g., Bennett v. United States, 663 F.3d 71, 85 (2d Cir. 2011) (explaining that its deference to the findings made by district court in the course of deciding an ineffectiveness claim reflected “the superiority of the trial judge’s position to make determinations of credibility since only the trial judge can be aware of the variations in demeanor and tone of voice that bear so heavily on the listener’s understanding of and belief in what is said” (citation omitted) (internal quotation marked omitted)); Ahmed v. Redman, 782 F.2d 409, 412 (3d Cir. 1986) (explaining that the statutory presumption of correctness attaches to the subsidiary findings of historical fact that are relevant to the resolution of mixed questions of fact and law raised by a claim of ineffective assistance of counsel); United States v. Auerbach, 745 F.2d 1157, 1161 (8th Cir. 1984) (explaining that, “[w]e will affirm a district court’s finding that a habeas petitioner was denied effective assistance of counsel where the district court’s findings of fact which support the conclusion of law are not clearly erroneous”); Gaines v. Comm’r of Corr., 51 A.3d 948, 959-60, 966 (Conn. 2012) (explaining that the postconviction OPINIONS OF THESUPREME COURTFILED WEDNESDAY, OCTOBER 16, 2019NOTICE - MEDIA RELEASE TIME IS 10:00 A.M.A19-0916 Bruce Clark, et al., Respondents, vs. City of Saint Paul, et al., Appellants. Ramsey County. 1. A referendum on a Saint Paul ordinance that establishes organized waste collection services does not conflict with the requirements in Minn. Stat. §§ 115A.94–.941 (2018), that municipalities ensure that residents have waste collection services including through appropriate local controls, because ordinances that are not subject to the referendum fulfill those requirements and the Legislature intended that municipalities have broad authority in the process for establishing organized waste collection. 2. A referendum on an ordinance that establishes organized waste collection services in the City does not impair the City’s contract obligations under the Contract Clauses of the United States and Minnesota Constitutions. Affirmed. Chief Justice Lorie S. Gildea.OPA190916-101619.pdfA18-0121 Ambree Getz, Respondent, vs. Eila Kaarina Peace, et al., Appellants. Court of Appeals.Email Please note: your email will become part of the public record. Phone: 651-266-8560Fax: 651-266-8574Dai Thao, Ward 1 | Jane L. Prince, Ward 7 | Chris Tolbert, Ward 3 | Amy Brendmoen, Ward 5 and Council President | Kassim Busuri, Ward 6| Mitra Jalali Nelson, Ward 4 | Rebecca Noecker, Ward 2Coordinated Collection | Saint Paul, Minnesota City Attorney | Saint Paul, MinnesotaCoordinated Collection | Saint Paul, MinnesotaThis contract provides a solid base to transition the city to Coordinated Collection and meets the priorities that the Council laid out for the negotiating team. See Final Contract, Final Contract Exhibits, and First Amendment.52 Organizer Ramac Franklin OrganizePageRight-click here to select Foth Office Search | Saint Paul, Minnesota| Code of Ordinances | St. Paul, MN | Municode LibrarySec. 14.01. - Power to levy assessments.Sec. 14.01.1. - Preliminary assessment.Sec. 14.01.2. - Charge for services.Sec. 14.01.3. - Reassessment.Sec. 14.01.4. - Appeal.Sec. 14.01.5. - Trial.Sec. 14.01.6. - Collection.Sec. 14.02. - Special assessment—Alternative procedure.City of Saint Paul - Meeting of City Council on 10/23/2019 at 3:30 PMRES 19-186417Authorizing the City of Saint Paul to enter into an agreement with the Minnesota Department of Revenue for the collection of Local Sales, Use Tax, and a Lodging Tax.ResolutionAuthorizing the City of Saint Paul to enter into an agreement with the Minnesota Department of Revenue for the collection of Local Sales, Use Tax, and a Lodging Tax.Ord 19-67117OrdinanceAmending section 220.05 of the Legislative Code to set rates for base level garbage service to be effective January 1, 2020.Businesses | Minnesota Department of RevenueAlcoholic Beverage TaxCigarette and Tobacco TaxesCorporation Franchise TaxEnergy Production TaxesEnvironmental Taxes and FeesEstate TaxFiduciary TaxGambling TaxesInsurance TaxesMining and Mineral Taxes MinnesotaCare TaxesMortgage Registry and Deed TaxPartnership TaxPetroleum TaxProperty TaxesS Corporation TaxSales and Use TaxUnrelated Business Income TaxWithholding Taxxx DetailsReportsFile #:Ord 19-67 Version: 1Name:Type:OrdinanceStatus:Second ReadingIn control:City CouncilFinal action:Title:Amending section 220.05 of the Legislative Code to set rates for base level garbage service to be effective January 1, 2020.Sponsors:Amy BrendmoenHistory (1)TextPublic Comments (2) Add New Comment2 recordsGroupExportDate NameDistrictOpinionCommentAction10/17/2019 6:51 PMCandidateSharonAndersonAgainstPlease read http://sharons-fraudupdate.blogspot.comForensic Files http://sharon4anderson.orgViolation of Charter,Ballot Vote No now Rate Setting Ponzi Taxing Scheme10/17/2019 10:24 AMCandidateSharonAndersonAgainstFor years Council has set Rates for NonProfit District Heating, now setting Rates for Trash a for Profit Business creates Contract Impairment, contrary to Private Citizens to do Business http://taxthemax.blogspot.comtherefore creating a Monoply,AntiTrustxxIN RE: Vanessa Yolanda REW | FindLaw Thomas A. Gilligan, Jr., Murnane Brandt, Saint Paul, MN, for respondent. James Allen Bergstrom, Roseville, MN, pro se. Lori Swanson, Attorney General, Alan I. Gilbert, Solicitor General, Michael Everson, Assistant Attorney General, Saint Paul, MN, for amicus curiae Minnesota Attorney General MEMORANDUM JUSTICE LORIE GILDEA'S50yrRestraining Orders 2019 - The Provocateurhttp://theeprovocateur.blogspot.com/2019/theeprovocateur.blogspot.com › ...The Minnesota Supreme Court, led by Judge Lorie Gildea, has to twist itself into ..... granted David Rucki a fifty (50) year restraining order against Dede Evavold. Now What Sharons latest http://sharonvcitystpaul.blogspot.com and http://citizenery-mncourts.blogspot.com651) 291-5297 (CAP) is defined by Minn. Stat. § 253B.19. Panel One - Judge AsphaugPanel Two - Judge RancourtPanel Three – Judge TilsenMinnesota Judicial Branch - Clerk of Appellate Courts Fri.18Oct2019 Tracking Opinions via Justice Lori GildeaMinnesota Judicial Branch - Clerk of Appellate CourtsBlogItBabeSandraGrazzini-Rucki,Pauper,ChildSupportviaJusticeLorieGildeahttps://theeprovocateur.blogspot.com/2019/09/sandra-grazzini-rucki-pauper-who-should.ht Just a Note re Kathleen Gearin Tolbert served as a law clerk for Ramsey County Chief Judge Kathleen Gearin, and then became an assistant attorney for Hennepin County. Other experience includes serving on the League of Minnesota Cities Board ofhttps://www.slideshare.net/Sharon4Anderson/affidavit-prejudicejudge-kathleen-gearinhttps://www.documentcloud.org/documents/4417581-19AVCV171950Order03212018.html re Dede EvavaldThursday, September 26, 2019Sandra Grazzini-Rucki, A Pauper Who Should Pay Child SupportThe Provocateur: Sandra Grazzini-Rucki, A Pauper Who Should Pay Child Supporthttps://theeprovocateur.blogspot.com/2019/09/sandra-grazzini-rucki-pauper-who-should.html?fbclid=IwAR2jTKIsegFHNzLh-mS5anl14m5aNneGU2cgYPTpZREsNTcVSqxZhDF52pcSharon Anderson aka Scarrella 651-776-5835 sharon4anderson@aol.comhttp://blogitbabe.blogspot.com http://sharon4council.blogspot.comLEGAL NOTICE: /s/Sharon4Anderson@aol.com ECF_P165913Pacersa1299 telfx: 651-776-5835:Attorney ProSe_InFact,Private Attorney General QuiTam Whistleblower, www.taxthemax.blogspot.com The Electronic Communications Privacy Act, 18 U.S.C. Ch.119 Sections 2510-2521 et seq., governs distribution of this "Message," including attachments, may contain the originator'sproprietary information. The originator hereby notifiesrecipients Message review, dissemination, copying, and content-based actions. Authorized carriers of this message shall expeditiously deliver this Message to intended recipients. See: Quon v. Arch