Sharon Anderson
1. Please provide a brief biography
WHISTLE BLOWER VA_WIDOW Title 31 Freedom Fighter4You_Consumer Advocate, RealEstate Entreprenuer_1st Non_Lawyer to run for Municipal Judge v Bertrand Poritsky 1994 Republican AG Nominee.
CONSTITUTIONAL/ STRICT CONSTRUCTIONIST "Sharon is not a Liar or Lawyer " MN.Constitution Art. III Separation of Powers, In Re: Scarrella for Associate Justice 221 NW2d.562_ Widow of Cpl.James R. Anderson US MC:11022885 VA 16136312 COVA Dec. 10th, 2002 US Dist.CV-02-332(Rosenbaum) http://www.angelfire.com/mn3/andersonadvocates/PDFedem2006/file6.pdf
3. Why are you running for a seat on the City Council?http://www.angelfire.com/mn3/andersonadvocates/2006water/PDFcases/sharoncases.pdf
St.Paul City Council is out of Control, Spending Money We do not have,
Disparate Impact vs. Citizenery. Implement Canons of Construction to eliminate Law Suits. SHARON: Accountable,Accessible,Advocate,must expose Major Fidicuary Corruption,Complicity, Software Glitches, Consolidate All City and CountyServices,Abolish City and County Attorneys, have 10 District Attorneys answerable to AG, Term Limits, Stop Spending, Abolish Excessive Consumption and ROW Fees VIA Theft,Trespass,Treason triggering 5th Amendment "takings" without Just Compensation.
Expose the Ponzi Schemes of 1,412 Vacant Bldgs, http://www.ci.stpaul.mn.us/index.aspx?NID=2272 Stealing Sharons Car, with Disabled License,Trailer,Propertys via False Statements of DSI Inspectors Joel Essling,Paula Seeley et al_ Subsidys_Forgivable Loans to the Rich Corporations on the backs of Homeowners must estopp. Shuting of Sharons Water "taking" Homestead Credits is Bizzare.
http://forums.e-democracy.org/groups/stpaul-issues/files/f/1679-2007-07-08T193758Z/5Jul07RatAssLegal_22.pdf DFL www.e-democracy.org
Suspending Sharon after She Filed her 1/2 Million Claim the Reprisals are Bizzare. The Judge from Hell ie: Kathleen Gearin in her Official and Personal Capacity on the SCAP triggering the Murder of Sharons 2nd Husband Cpl Jim Anderson News for Judge from Hell Kathleen Gearin. http://www.caught.net/caught/crime.htm
4. Please list any endorsements you have received:
5. What is the biggest challenge facing your ward and how would you propose addressing it?
Empty Downton Bldgs ie: MN Bldg Low income Housing, Dist. Heating Non Profits_Tax Exempt, Central Corridor Spending out of thin air, without State & Fed. Funds in the Bank.Disparate Impact,Rich Corp "taking" from the Homeless and Poor. Even Dorothy Day charges "RENT", Preservation of Historic Buildings re:
http://www.historicsaintpaul.org/newsroom/publications/journal re:Thanks to Dave Brooks
6. What is the biggest challenge facing the City of Saint Paul and how would you propose addressing it?
Eliminate the Legislative Hearing Officer Marcia Mormond appointed by Lantry, Covert Complicity with DSI, Have 1 Inspector for the Buildings. Eliminate LGA as a BandAid on the Fidicuary Trust of City St.Paul
www.sicko-citystpaul.blogspot.com JURISDICTION This civil action arises under the laws of the United States and the State of Minnesota. This Court has jurisdiction and Plaintiffs herein are alleging standing under: (1) Title IX of the Organized Crime Control Act of 1970, as amended, 18 U.S.C. Sections 1961, et seq.; (2) Title VIII, the Fair Housing Act of 1968 and the Pair Housing Amendments Act of 1988,42 U.S.C. Sections 3601, et seq.; (3) 42 U.S.C. Sections 1981,1982 and 1985; and Case 0:05-cv-00461-JNE-SRN Document 12 Filed 07/21/2005 Page 3 of 66 (4) 42 U.S.C. Section 1983, for violation of the Fourth, Fifth, Ninth and Fourteenth Amendments to the Constitution of the United States. The jurisdiction of this Court is authorized by 18 U.S.C. Section 1964 (c), 42 U.S.C. Section 3613,28 U.S.C. Section 1331 and 28 U.S.C. Section 1343. This Court has supplemental jurisdiction over the state claims herein pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Section 1367, as Plaintiffs are alleging state claims arising from a common nucleus of operative facts with Plaintiffs' federal claims. Plaintiffs seek an injunction against Defendants as authorized by 42 U.S.C. Section 36 13 and/or 18 U.S.C. 1961, et seq., and/or 42 U.S.C. Section 1982. VENUE Venue herein is proper under 18 U.S.C. Section 1965 (a), 42 U.S.C. Section 3610 (d) and 28 U.S.C. Section 1391(b).
http://legaleaglesharon.blogspot.com/
7. If you are elected, what would be your top three priorities?
1.) Agree with Chamber "Shared Services" i. except Combine Police,Fire,Sheriff must live in city.with ONE CAPTION 2.) Council must estopp delegating their Jurisdiction/Authority to Dist.Council,Board, specifically Marcia Moermond Legislative Hearing Officer that simulates legal process's. 3.) Commerce,Tax,Education,Internet_Software,LGA REFORMS
8. What role should the City play in attracting and retaining jobs?
Agree: The Saint Paul Area Chamber of Commerce encourages public entities to implement shared services strategies as a means to pool limited resources and adopt cost-effective approaches to delivering services. As state and local governments continue to face fiscal challenges, it is vital that the quality of and access to core services is maintained without increasing the cost to taxpayers. Implementing shared services programs offers local governments an innovative way to achieve this goal. The Chamber is committed to supporting our public partners that share services. We believe that shared services programs offer significant opportunity to maintain and even improve the level of service to citizens and businesses.
9. Do you support tax incentives for businesses that create jobs in Saint Paul?
YES
10. Of all the different services provided by City government, what do you believe are the most essential?
11. What new services should the City provide?
None must Downsize,Consolidate,Eliminate, Exception High Tech Free Access
12. What services currently provided by the City should be reduced or eliminated?
Legislative Hearing Officer Marcia Moermond, her staff, ROW, Excessive Consumption Fees based on Theft,Trespass and Treason to deny the citizenery the LAW
13. The City of Saint Paul depends on Local Government Aid (LGA) from the State of Minnesota to balance the local budget. It is likely the amount of LGA the city receives will be further reduced, directly impacting the City of Saint Paul budget. How would you propose to address this shortfall in the City budget if LGA payments to Saint Paul are significantly reduced or even eliminated?
http://www.stpaul.gov/DocumentView.aspx?DID=15729 LGA was initated 1971 re: MN Miracle based on need_capacity Have to study this further, Live within the City Budget, Tooo many Supervisors making over $100,000.00 yrly re: Steve Magner who lives in Stillwater.
14. How do you view the current business environment in Saint Paul? What changes would you like to see to improve it?
Business Climate "Bad" will not improve with City Spending, Borrowing from Peter to Pay Paul is not Good Business
15. Do you support the plan to build a regional ballpark in Lowertown? Why or why not?
YES "but for" the Traffic Congestion re: 30 mile limit on Shepherd Rd, and Does St.Paul have the Financing in Place?
16. Do you support the current plan that would build a new Minnesota Vikings Stadium on the site of the former Twin Cities Army Ammunition Plant (TCAAP) in Arden Hills? Why or why not?
Not Sure to build on Polluted Land is Questionable. Again is the Financing in place?
17. What should be done to address the impact the Central Corridor Light Rail Transit (CCLRT) and its construction is having on local businesses and the community?
Once Business is Gone, it does not return, I can't shop at the Midway Rainbow its to far to walk to bus stop etc. Its out of Hand, Who Knows the USA may Default in Aug if the Debt Ceiling is not in place
18. Many communities and government entities in the East Metro work together to provide services more efficiently and cost effectively (See Shared Services Survey attached to original Questionnaire email). Do you believe that Saint Paul uses these types of partnerships appropriately? Are there any specific areas where you think additional sharing of services should be used or studied?
19. Is there anything else you would like to add?
Thank You for the Opportunity Rank Voting is interesting, Disappointed Lantry has no opposition, with the $250 filing fee, its a hardship further Bizzare when the School Board fee is two dollars.
www.taxthemax.blogspot.com
← Back to Home
© Copyright Saint Paul Area Chamber of Commerce 2011
