Sharon4CouncilWard2: SharonAnderson_FredMelo

Sunday, September 18, 2011

SharonAnderson_FredMelo_PioneerPress

askcorrections@co.ramsey.mn.us, askdoj@usdoj.gov, b.todd.jones@usdoj.gov, rca@co.ramsey.mn.us, john.choi@co.ramsey.mn.us, matt.bostrom@co.ramsey.mn.us
Sent: 9/18/2011 12:20:13 P.M. Central Daylight Time
Subj: Re:PP: Candidate Questionnaire Sharon Anderson aka Peterson_Scarrella

Sun.18Sept2011 Note to Fred Melo At some point Sharons Hometown Paper must print the Truth with E-Commerce Links 1. TAXTRUTH TRILOGY 2.COMMERCE: a. Housing,Health, 3. Secret Government, Courts Complicity with Council,City,Co. and State Attorneys.

TO the Above Named re: http://www.twincities.com/ ie: fmelo@pioneerpress.com

http://forums.e-democracy.org/p/sharonanderson EVEN the Reporter Melo has "Blocked" the Truth.

DISCLAIMER: UNDER PENALITY OF PERJURY, FORENSIC FILES

SHARON HAS SUED THE PIONEERPRESS, SO PREJUDICE.

SHARONS POWER OF ATTORNEY ONLINE IN THE EVENT OF FURTHER DISABILITY,DEATH,DISPARAGMENT OF TITLES. http://www.angelfire.com/mn3/andersonadvocates/2006water/PDFcorr/SADPA4172006.pdf

LEGAL AFFIDAVIT OF SHARON ANDERSONs TAX_TRUTH_TRIOLOGY

http://forums.e-democracy.org/groups/stpaul-issues/files/f/797-2007-02-27T034339Z/GrandJuryPet10Dec04_25.pdf

SHARONS BIO http://www.angelfire.com/mn3/andersonadvocates/bio.html

AKA

PETERSON_CHERGOSKY_BECKLEY 1ST HUSBAND

SCARRELLA iN re: Scarrella4Justice 221NW2nd562 Illegally Published without Sharons Permission and without Royalitys to 4 QUIET TITLE'S https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEgwjkqWYV2XN8TmzAfEu5WkePGWYqva7VIVCgd2HpBTphyphenhyphensAyhLN-BUFHvxEZvkofwDHD8r8zHa6bV7ecPdtG-45g9HxM4IQOJXAYkRFwVfsKEi8mUzSmLvBeW8e9ffDcsefrhvHl3aO-Ux/s1600-h/Scarrella221NW2d562Justice.jpg

RULING CASE'S SHARON HAS CHALLENGED DAVE THUNE SINCE 1991 ELECTION'S UNABATED BY THE STATE AND FEDS

http://www.angelfire.com/mn3/andersonadvocates/2006water/PDFcases/sharoncases.pdf

In a message dated 9/14/2011 6:11:50 P.M. Central Daylight Time, fmelo@pioneerpress.com writes:

Sept. 14, 2011

Dear City Council candidate,

In addition to our regular election coverage, the St. Paul Pioneer Press will run short profiles of the City Council candidates online as soon as possible, as well as in print in mid-October. Sharon will use her St.PaulChamber Response's also http://wethepeopleusa.ning.com/profile/SharonScarrellaAnderson

http://saintpaulmncoc.weblinkconnect.com/cwt/external/wcpages/public/frames_spacc/parent.html

Name: Sharon Anderson sharon4anderson@aol.com www.facebook.com/sharon4anderson www.twitter.com/sharon4anderson

Age: Senior

Family: Extended www.petersonfamilytree.blogspot.com

Employment: Retired: Reduced to Poverty via Corrupt City and City/Co.Attorneys contrary to 42USC 3631 Housing_Peonage Title 18s1581http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/usc_sec_18_00001581----000-.html

Experience: VA Widow_Whistleblower_QuiTam_Private AG_Attorney Pro Se_InFact

Education: School Hard Knocks_ Eastern Hights GradeSchool,Ames Jr.High,Central High_Homegrown Hometown Gal. Been There Done That. http://sharon-mn-ecf.blogspot.com/2007/03/foia-06cv-permission-to.html

3 questions: (50 words each, maximum)

A) What is the top issue facing your ward, and what would you do about it?

Tax Truth Trilogey http://forums.e-democracy.org/groups/stpaul-issues/files/f/774-2007-02-27T034310Z/1058-Warrant_34.pdf

http://www.angelfire.com/mn3/andersonadvocates/PDFedem2006/file8.pdf Housing,Homeless, HealthCare http://www.bull.us/references/minnesotacasestudy.html

http://forums.e-democracy.org/groups/stpaul-issues/files/f/900-2007-02-27T034409Z/WritProA06-1150_30Jun06.pdf

http://www.ci.stpaul.mn.us/index.aspx?NID=22721,412 Vacant Bldgs is Cash Cow 4 City, loss of tax base is Bizzare.

http://forums.e-democracy.org/groups/stpaul-issues/files/f/1679-2007-07-08T193758Z/5Jul07RatAssLegal_22.pdf

Eliminate Legislative Hearing Marcia Mormond , Complicit with DSI, Have 1 Inspector

. Eliminate LGA as a BandAid on the Fidicuary Trust of City St.Paul www.sicko-citystpaul.blogspot.com

City simulating Legal Process creating Law Suits ie: Wild Onion http://www.oah.state.mn.us/aljBase/602019740-%20fnrpt.htm which Disparate Impact is Costly.

JURISDICTION This civil action arises under the laws of the United States and the State of Minnesota. This Court has jurisdiction and Plaintiffs herein are alleging standing under: (1) Title IX of the Organized Crime Control Act of 1970, as amended, 18 U.S.C. Sections 1961, et seq.; (2) Title VIII, the Fair Housing Act of 1968 and the Pair Housing Amendments Act of 1988,42 U.S.C. Sections 3601, et seq.; (3) 42 U.S.C. Sections 1981,1982 and 1985; and Case 0:05-cv-00461-JNE-SRN Document 12 Filed 07/21/2005 Page 3 of 66 (4) 42 U.S.C. Section 1983, for

(b). http://legaleaglesharon.blogspot.com/ 1. Property Tax Reform www.sharon4anderson.org Forensic Files online http://www.house.leg.state.mn.us/hrd/issinfo/hmvexclusion.pdf

http://mn2020hindsight.org/view/tax-income-not-property Constitutional Challenge: "taking" our Homestead Credits,replacing with Market Value Exclusion 45%on 76 Thous, then 9% thereafter SHIFTING_ to Business and Working Class Poor, Market Values over 76 Thousand.

2. REALESTATE_COMMERCE REFORM:

City St. Paul's Ponzi Schemes to Steal Cars,Trailers,Personal Property of Demo Buildings for Profit, then charge Excessive Consumption,ROW ie: Right of Way Maintenance FEES, if not paid then 12% interest is NOT RIGHT. http://www.taxthemax.blogspot.com/ http://www.sicko-citystpaul.blogspot.com/

SECRET GOVERNMENT MUST NOT BE TOLERATED Forensic Files online

http://www.angelfire.com/planet/andersonadvocates/index.html

re: City St.Paul Consent Agenda listed under one Motion

3. TERM LIMITS_ABOLISH THE LEGISLATIVE HEARINGS and or Have Sworn Testimony of the Executive Branch of DSI Employees, with Criminal Indictments of MS609.43

4. Eliminate the 42 City Attorneys and their Staff, it is Bizzare that the City Attorney employeed by the Mayor even sits at the Council Meetings.

http://saintpaulmncoc.weblinkconnect.com/cwt/external/wcpages/public/frames_spacc/parent.htm

Closed Door Policy when the City is sued: http://stpaul.legistar.com/MeetingDetail.aspx?ID=159229&GUID=080CC187-67FD-4445-83BD-98D8FCC67B8C&Options=info&Search=

http://www.angelfire.com/mn3/andersonadvocates/PDFedem2006/file6.pdf

B) The mayor’s current budget proposal calls for a mix of property levy tax increases, fee hikes, layoffs and service reductions. Does this approach make sense, or how would you suggest altering this mix? (50 words)

Chris Coleman has been a Thorn in Sharons Side, over 20 years he clerked for Doris Huspeni , apparantly writing the " unpublished" opinion "taking Sharon's Homestead.

http://sharon4anderson.wordpress.com/2009/12/01/95/ http://www.angelfire.com/planet/andersonadvocates/PDFedem2006/file4.pdf

http://forums.e-democracy.org/groups/stpaul-issues/files/f/1202-2007-03-02T233420Z/SASC1988Brief15pdf.pdf

http://sharon-mn-ecf.blogspot.com/2007/03/foia-06cv-permission-to.html

C) Why should voters choose you to represent them? (50 words)

Sharon is one of YOU, trying to make Government Accountable, Sharon exposing Secret Government, Lantry's Larceny,Thune's HRA_Tech errors,Heinous Helgen,BossTweedBostrom,Happy Harris (leavng),Carter's Complicity,Starks_StarFunding?. http://sharon4anderson.wordpress.com/2009/09/23/google-lawmen-cases-mn-62cv09-1163/

Sharon4Safety _ Hometown_Homegrown_knows where the Bodies of RealEstate Complicity are Buried. Will help you to help yourself immediately. Over 100 Blogs numerous Web Sites http://www.sharon4anderson.org/

Affidavit Prejudice Kathleen Gearin http://www.slideshare.net/Sharon4Anderson/affidavit-prejudicejudge-kathleen-gearin

Sincerely,

Frederick Melo Newsroom / Reporter
ST. PAUL PIONEER PRESS
phone 651.228.2172 • fax 651.228.5500 • mobile 651.398.5534
345 Cedar Street • St. Paul, MN 55101 fmelo@pioneerpress.com

Read the Pioneer Press daily: http://www.twincities.com/
Follow me on Twitter: www.twitter/FrederickMelo

Check out the super-secret St. Paul City Hall Scoop: http://blogs.twincities.com/cityhallscoop/

/s/ Sharon4Anderson@aol.com ECF_P165913_sa1299 Attorney Pro Se_InFact,Private Attorney General Sharon4 Anderson - Google Profile ,Candidate 2010 iGoogle http://www.sharonagmn2010.blogspot.com/ Homestead Act of 1862 Blogger: User Profile: Sharon Anderson SharonsYahoo!
S har1058's Buzz Activity Page - My Buzz Activity - Yahoo! Buzz
political ?(Sharon4Anderson?)
Sharon Anderson's Blog Click here: Sharon4Council file4[1]Shar_thune_22.pdf - Google Docs
Disclaimer on Site'sThe Electronic Communications Privacy Act MY FindLaw (ECPA) sets out the provisions for access, use, disclosure, interception and privacy protections of electronic communications. S haron4Anderson Scribd pdf files. The law was enacted in 1986 and covers various forms of wire and electronic communications. According to the U.S. Code, electronic communications "means any transfer of signs, signals, writing, images, sounds, data, or intelligence of any nature transmitted in whole or in part by a wire, radio, electromagnetic, photo electronic or photo optical system that affects interstate or foreign commerce." ECPA prohibits unlawful access and certain disclosures of communication contents. Additionally, the law prevents government entities from requiring disclosure of electronic communications from a provider without proper procedure. The Legal Institute provides Title 18 of the U.S. Code , which encompasses ECPA. Blogger: Dashboard
NOTICE: This communication is not encrypted. This e-mail (including any attachments) is covered by the Electronic Communications Privacy Act, 18 U.S.C. §§ 2510-2521, and Electronic Communications Privacy Act The CAN-SPAM Act: Requirements

SharonvsJusticeGildeaQuidProQuo

Sun20Oct2019 TO THE ABOVE NAMED;SERVICE ELECTRONICALLY,EMAIL,SOCIAL MEDIA AND BLOGS CRIMINAL ALLEGATIONS RICO RE QUID PRO QUO NO FILING FEE4WHISTLEBLOWER ATTORNEY PRO SE PRIVATE ATTORNEY GENERAL RE QUITAM STATE OF MINNESOTA IN SUPREME COURT A19-0916Minnesota Judicial Branch - BioChief Justice Lorie Skjerven GildeaSupreme CourtSend an email via our contact formState Court Administrator's Office(651) 296-2474 (phone)(651) 297-5636 (fax)Minnesota Judicial Center (MJC) Suite #: 13525 Rev. Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. Blvd.St. Paul, MN 55155 Sharon Anderson Ward 2 QuiTam Relator White,Widow,WhistleblowerName: Sharon AndersonPublic Office Sought: Saint Paul City Council Email: Sharon4Anderson@aol.comPhone: 651-776-5835Website: sharon4council.blogspot.comTwitter Handle: @sharon4andersonFacebook: Sharon Anderson2019 Saint paul Voter Guide City St.Paul QuidProQuo unabated by Chief Justice Lorie Gildea QUESTIONS 1. Citys Trash/Garbarge Contract 11Nov2017 techinally must be voided, basedon Asst. City Attorney Rachael Tierney, Sarah Grewing, then and today giving legal Advise to past and present Council to Malign, usurp City Charter, triggeHouse Committee on Oversight and Government Reformrs Ineffective Assistance of City Council's Resolutions Ord 18-39 further Quid Pro Quo. VoteNo Save our Charter. 2. Has Chief Justice Lorie S.Gildea Covertly by Published Order indirectly,directlOPA190916-101619.pd pg 3 further over 6,000 signed signatures mandates Investigations over and above the 5Nov2019 Ballot and Elections. a. City Attorneys simulating legal process's for Citys Pecuniary Gain.? Cash Cow 4 Lawyers.Quid Pro QuoAlmanac - Twin Cities PBS .ATTY GENERAL ELLISON, ST PAUL TRASH FIGHT, DAYTON’S PORTRAITMN Attorney General Ellison, Hazelden’s Mark Mishek, Former Gov Dayton portrait More 3. Legal Notice re Separation of Powers, the Landlord Case and now Trash Casewithout MN Attorney General Mike Hatch,Lory Swanson and now Current MNAG Keith Ellison, intervention to Protect the State Laws, Constitution State and Federal as mentioned, 4. Has Justice Lorie Gildea in her Official Capacity looked the other way on other Lawsuits vs. City St. Paul, specifically USSC10-1032 Titled Magner vs. GallagherHouse Committee on Oversight and Government Reform The quid pro quo between the Department of Justice and the City of St. Paul, Minnesota, is largely the result of the machinations of one man: Assistant Attorney General Thomas Perez. Yet the consequences of his actions will negatively affect not only Fredrick Newell and the lowincome residents of St. Paul who he championed. The effects of this quid pro quo will be felt by future whistleblowers who act courageously, and often at great personal risk, to fight fraud and identify waste on behalf of federal taxpayers. The effects of withdrawing Magner will be felt by the minority tenants in St. Paul who, due to the case’s challenge to the City’s housing code, continue to live with rampant rodent infestations and inadequate plumbing. The effects of sacrificing Newell’s case will cost American taxpayers the opportunity to recover up to $200 million and allow St. Paul’s misdeeds to go unpunished. Far more troubling, however, is the fundamental damage that this quid pro quo has done to the rule of law in the United States and to the reputation of the Department of Justice as a fair and impartial arbiter of justice 5, Has Chief Justice Lorie Gildea overreached her Personal and Official Duties, re; Committment Panel is Cap knowing appointment of members ie Knutson,Gearin,Smith,Metzen,Asphaug, etal knowing Public Distaste,Distrust of these Judges b. 59 yr Restraining Orders, Restraint of Free Speech, by Gearin Ordering Web Sites taken down or Criminal Charges. BIZZARE. see Memorandum below. re Dede Evavald, Sharon Anderson re Concern Darlene Winters Trust Acct. Sandra Grazzini et alOpinions-Unpublished?Archives https://opinions-unpublished.blogspot.com/2013/Sharons-CourtRecords: In the Matter Darlene WinterPO62-14-696_HS1113StPaulAveElmer MackSocWorker postconviction court’s factual findings, not only does the majority depart from our precedent, but it also places Minnesota out of step with courts across the country. See, e.g., Bennett v. United States, 663 F.3d 71, 85 (2d Cir. 2011) (explaining that its deference to the findings made by district court in the course of deciding an ineffectiveness claim reflected “the superiority of the trial judge’s position to make determinations of credibility since only the trial judge can be aware of the variations in demeanor and tone of voice that bear so heavily on the listener’s understanding of and belief in what is said” (citation omitted) (internal quotation marked omitted)); Ahmed v. Redman, 782 F.2d 409, 412 (3d Cir. 1986) (explaining that the statutory presumption of correctness attaches to the subsidiary findings of historical fact that are relevant to the resolution of mixed questions of fact and law raised by a claim of ineffective assistance of counsel); United States v. Auerbach, 745 F.2d 1157, 1161 (8th Cir. 1984) (explaining that, “[w]e will affirm a district court’s finding that a habeas petitioner was denied effective assistance of counsel where the district court’s findings of fact which support the conclusion of law are not clearly erroneous”); Gaines v. Comm’r of Corr., 51 A.3d 948, 959-60, 966 (Conn. 2012) (explaining that the postconviction Complaints vs. Justice Lorie Gildea Lorie Skjerven Gildea - Wikipedia Because of Gildea's discrimination to favor women, the men have been left homeless, destroyed livelihoods, forced into squalor, and, most importantly, damaged their families. Gildea has condoned these smear campaigns that are OPA091641-0531.pdfused to prevent the men from speaking. postconviction court’s factual findings, not only does the majority depart from our precedent, but it also places Minnesota out of step with courts across the country. See, e.g., Bennett v. United States, 663 F.3d 71, 85 (2d Cir. 2011) (explaining that its deference to the findings made by district court in the course of deciding an ineffectiveness claim reflected “the superiority of the trial judge’s position to make determinations of credibility since only the trial judge can be aware of the variations in demeanor and tone of voice that bear so heavily on the listener’s understanding of and belief in what is said” (citation omitted) (internal quotation marked omitted)); Ahmed v. Redman, 782 F.2d 409, 412 (3d Cir. 1986) (explaining that the statutory presumption of correctness attaches to the subsidiary findings of historical fact that are relevant to the resolution of mixed questions of fact and law raised by a claim of ineffective assistance of counsel); United States v. Auerbach, 745 F.2d 1157, 1161 (8th Cir. 1984) (explaining that, “[w]e will affirm a district court’s finding that a habeas petitioner was denied effective assistance of counsel where the district court’s findings of fact which support the conclusion of law are not clearly erroneous”); Gaines v. Comm’r of Corr., 51 A.3d 948, 959-60, 966 (Conn. 2012) (explaining that the postconviction OPINIONS OF THESUPREME COURTFILED WEDNESDAY, OCTOBER 16, 2019NOTICE - MEDIA RELEASE TIME IS 10:00 A.M.A19-0916 Bruce Clark, et al., Respondents, vs. City of Saint Paul, et al., Appellants. Ramsey County. 1. A referendum on a Saint Paul ordinance that establishes organized waste collection services does not conflict with the requirements in Minn. Stat. §§ 115A.94–.941 (2018), that municipalities ensure that residents have waste collection services including through appropriate local controls, because ordinances that are not subject to the referendum fulfill those requirements and the Legislature intended that municipalities have broad authority in the process for establishing organized waste collection. 2. A referendum on an ordinance that establishes organized waste collection services in the City does not impair the City’s contract obligations under the Contract Clauses of the United States and Minnesota Constitutions. Affirmed. Chief Justice Lorie S. Gildea.OPA190916-101619.pdfA18-0121 Ambree Getz, Respondent, vs. Eila Kaarina Peace, et al., Appellants. Court of Appeals.Email Please note: your email will become part of the public record. Phone: 651-266-8560Fax: 651-266-8574Dai Thao, Ward 1 | Jane L. Prince, Ward 7 | Chris Tolbert, Ward 3 | Amy Brendmoen, Ward 5 and Council President | Kassim Busuri, Ward 6| Mitra Jalali Nelson, Ward 4 | Rebecca Noecker, Ward 2Coordinated Collection | Saint Paul, Minnesota City Attorney | Saint Paul, MinnesotaCoordinated Collection | Saint Paul, MinnesotaThis contract provides a solid base to transition the city to Coordinated Collection and meets the priorities that the Council laid out for the negotiating team. See Final Contract, Final Contract Exhibits, and First Amendment.52 Organizer Ramac Franklin OrganizePageRight-click here to select Foth Office Search | Saint Paul, Minnesota| Code of Ordinances | St. Paul, MN | Municode LibrarySec. 14.01. - Power to levy assessments.Sec. 14.01.1. - Preliminary assessment.Sec. 14.01.2. - Charge for services.Sec. 14.01.3. - Reassessment.Sec. 14.01.4. - Appeal.Sec. 14.01.5. - Trial.Sec. 14.01.6. - Collection.Sec. 14.02. - Special assessment—Alternative procedure.City of Saint Paul - Meeting of City Council on 10/23/2019 at 3:30 PMRES 19-186417Authorizing the City of Saint Paul to enter into an agreement with the Minnesota Department of Revenue for the collection of Local Sales, Use Tax, and a Lodging Tax.ResolutionAuthorizing the City of Saint Paul to enter into an agreement with the Minnesota Department of Revenue for the collection of Local Sales, Use Tax, and a Lodging Tax.Ord 19-67117OrdinanceAmending section 220.05 of the Legislative Code to set rates for base level garbage service to be effective January 1, 2020.Businesses | Minnesota Department of RevenueAlcoholic Beverage TaxCigarette and Tobacco TaxesCorporation Franchise TaxEnergy Production TaxesEnvironmental Taxes and FeesEstate TaxFiduciary TaxGambling TaxesInsurance TaxesMining and Mineral Taxes MinnesotaCare TaxesMortgage Registry and Deed TaxPartnership TaxPetroleum TaxProperty TaxesS Corporation TaxSales and Use TaxUnrelated Business Income TaxWithholding Taxxx DetailsReportsFile #:Ord 19-67 Version: 1Name:Type:OrdinanceStatus:Second ReadingIn control:City CouncilFinal action:Title:Amending section 220.05 of the Legislative Code to set rates for base level garbage service to be effective January 1, 2020.Sponsors:Amy BrendmoenHistory (1)TextPublic Comments (2) Add New Comment2 recordsGroupExportDate NameDistrictOpinionCommentAction10/17/2019 6:51 PMCandidateSharonAndersonAgainstPlease read http://sharons-fraudupdate.blogspot.comForensic Files http://sharon4anderson.orgViolation of Charter,Ballot Vote No now Rate Setting Ponzi Taxing Scheme10/17/2019 10:24 AMCandidateSharonAndersonAgainstFor years Council has set Rates for NonProfit District Heating, now setting Rates for Trash a for Profit Business creates Contract Impairment, contrary to Private Citizens to do Business http://taxthemax.blogspot.comtherefore creating a Monoply,AntiTrustxxIN RE: Vanessa Yolanda REW | FindLaw Thomas A. Gilligan, Jr., Murnane Brandt, Saint Paul, MN, for respondent. James Allen Bergstrom, Roseville, MN, pro se. Lori Swanson, Attorney General, Alan I. Gilbert, Solicitor General, Michael Everson, Assistant Attorney General, Saint Paul, MN, for amicus curiae Minnesota Attorney General MEMORANDUM JUSTICE LORIE GILDEA'S50yrRestraining Orders 2019 - The Provocateurhttp://theeprovocateur.blogspot.com/2019/theeprovocateur.blogspot.com › ...The Minnesota Supreme Court, led by Judge Lorie Gildea, has to twist itself into ..... granted David Rucki a fifty (50) year restraining order against Dede Evavold. Now What Sharons latest http://sharonvcitystpaul.blogspot.com and http://citizenery-mncourts.blogspot.com651) 291-5297 (CAP) is defined by Minn. Stat. § 253B.19. Panel One - Judge AsphaugPanel Two - Judge RancourtPanel Three – Judge TilsenMinnesota Judicial Branch - Clerk of Appellate Courts Fri.18Oct2019 Tracking Opinions via Justice Lori GildeaMinnesota Judicial Branch - Clerk of Appellate CourtsBlogItBabeSandraGrazzini-Rucki,Pauper,ChildSupportviaJusticeLorieGildeahttps://theeprovocateur.blogspot.com/2019/09/sandra-grazzini-rucki-pauper-who-should.ht Just a Note re Kathleen Gearin Tolbert served as a law clerk for Ramsey County Chief Judge Kathleen Gearin, and then became an assistant attorney for Hennepin County. Other experience includes serving on the League of Minnesota Cities Board ofhttps://www.slideshare.net/Sharon4Anderson/affidavit-prejudicejudge-kathleen-gearinhttps://www.documentcloud.org/documents/4417581-19AVCV171950Order03212018.html re Dede EvavaldThursday, September 26, 2019Sandra Grazzini-Rucki, A Pauper Who Should Pay Child SupportThe Provocateur: Sandra Grazzini-Rucki, A Pauper Who Should Pay Child Supporthttps://theeprovocateur.blogspot.com/2019/09/sandra-grazzini-rucki-pauper-who-should.html?fbclid=IwAR2jTKIsegFHNzLh-mS5anl14m5aNneGU2cgYPTpZREsNTcVSqxZhDF52pcSharon Anderson aka Scarrella 651-776-5835 sharon4anderson@aol.comhttp://blogitbabe.blogspot.com http://sharon4council.blogspot.comLEGAL NOTICE: /s/Sharon4Anderson@aol.com ECF_P165913Pacersa1299 telfx: 651-776-5835:Attorney ProSe_InFact,Private Attorney General QuiTam Whistleblower, www.taxthemax.blogspot.com The Electronic Communications Privacy Act, 18 U.S.C. Ch.119 Sections 2510-2521 et seq., governs distribution of this "Message," including attachments, may contain the originator'sproprietary information. The originator hereby notifiesrecipients Message review, dissemination, copying, and content-based actions. Authorized carriers of this message shall expeditiously deliver this Message to intended recipients. See: Quon v. Arch