SharonsSlideShare

SharonsFacebookStory

Here’s my Facebook movie. Find yours at https://facebook.com/lookback/ #FacebookIs10

Posted by Sharon Anderson on Monday, February 10, 2014

Steinhauser vs CitySt.Paul et al

https://www.scribd.com/doc/274740120/Steinhauser-et-alFairHousingFS-Brief-Per-Ct-Order-Ecf-8-3-15-Copy

SharonsVideo

https://www.facebook.com/sharon4anderson/videos/10202718447871762/

Saturday, April 9, 2011

GoogleScholar_Civil_Constitutional_Cases

http://scholar.google.com/scholar_case?about=12510054663270489425&q=%22325+US+91%22&hl=en&as_sdt=2,60&scilh=0

sharon4anderson@gmail.com Scholar Preferences My Account Sign out

















Read this caseHow cited

Screws v. United States, 325 US 91 - Supreme Court 1945










How this document has been cited








—to avoid unconstitutional vagueness, "willful" element of federal statute proscribing the deprivation of constitutional rights under the color of law interpreted to require that defendant-official be shown to have had the "specific intent... to deprive a person of a right which has been made specific either by the express terms of the Constitution or laws of the United States or by … - in In re Kay, 1970 and 67 similar citations






—is" only for an act knowingly done with the purpose of doing that which the statute prohibits, the accused cannot be said to suffer from lack of warning or knowledge that the act which he does is a violation of law. The requirement that the act must be willful or purposeful may not render certain, for all purposes, a statutory definition of the crime which is in some respects … - in United States v. Boyce Motor Lines, 1951 and 88 similar citations






—the Supreme Court rendered its seminal decision defining the specific intent required to support a criminal prosecution under the federal civil rights law. - in US v. Messerlian, 1987 and 64 similar citations






—stating that "it is plain that basic to the concept of due process of law in a criminal case is a trial—a trial in a court of law - in Consolidated Edison Co. of NY, Inc. v. Pataki, 2002 and 67 similar citations






An action by a wrongdoer clothed with the authority of State Law is an action" under color of" State Law. - in Tigner v. STATE OF NY, COM'R OF DEPT. OF CORR., 1983 and 70 similar citations






However, under this statute a violation can be found only if the defendant acted "willfully," that is, with "a specific intent to deprive a person of a federal right made definite by decision or other rule of law." - in Adickes v. SH Kress & Co., 1970 and 49 similar citations






"Under color of law means under `pretense'of law. Thus, acts of officers in the ambit of their personal pursuits are plainly excluded. Acts of officers who undertake to perform their official duties are included whether they hew the line of their authority or overstep it. " - in Heverly v. Simcox, 2006 and 102 similar citations






Under our federal system the administration of criminal justice rests with the States except as Congress, acting within the scope of [its] delegated powers, has created offenses against the United States - in US v. Kegel, 1996 and 96 similar citations






The United States Supreme Court favors an interpretation of legislation in a manner which supports its constitutionality. - in Hejira Corp. v. MacFarlane, 1981 and 32 similar citations






The requisite intent could be established by" all the attendant circumstances-the malice of [the defendant], the weapons used in the assault, its character and duration, the provocation, if any, and the like." - in United States v. Marler, 1985 and 31 similar citations


Cited by



Adickes v. SH Kress & Co. 398 US 144 - Supreme Court 1970


[CITATION] American constitutional law LH Tribe - 1978


Wolff v. McDonnell 418 US 539 - Supreme Court 1974


United States v. Lopez 514 US 549 - Supreme Court 1995


Monroe v. Pape 365 US 167 - Supreme Court 1961

all 3,639 citing documents »


Related documents



United States v. Classic 313 US 299 - Supreme Court 1941


Monroe v. Pape 365 US 167 - Supreme Court 1961


Williams v. United States 341 US 97 - Supreme Court 1951


United States v. Price 383 US 787 - Supreme Court 1966


[CITATION] SECURITY OF THE PERSON ECSTO PROTECT - Political and civil rights in the United ..., 1967

all related documents »


Go to Google Home - About Google - About Google Scholar

©2011 Google

Sharon4Council

VoteSharonWard2Council_AndersonAdvocate4All

VoteSharonWard2Council_AndersonAdvocate4All
SharonsSocratiesMethod TruthTrust4YOU

JURIST Paper Chase

Dayton's MN ShutDown Costs

2007 Sharon StPaul Ward(2) Election

Minnesota.com

Blog Directory for St Paul, MN

Snap Shots

Get Free Shots from Snap.com

AllMNSharon4

Sharon4Council: Empower Ethics Empathize Energize Educate:

Sharon4Council: Empower  Ethics Empathize Energize Educate: