Sharon4CouncilWard2: SharonAnderson v St.PaulPoliceTomSmith

Sunday, February 27, 2011

SharonAnderson v St.PaulPoliceTomSmith_Don Luna

Sun.27Feb2011

AFFIDAVIT OF REPUBLICAN SHARON SCARRELLA ANDERSON AKA PETERSON_CHERGOSKY

Candidate Ward (2) St.Paul City Council http://www.sharon4council.blogspot.com/ a White Woman Swede_Gyspy.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UvYIjFtPQEk&feature=related

AMAZING GRACE

Ruling Case's

http://www.justalandlord.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/02/1102-Petition-for-Writ-of-Certiori.pdf

http://www.scribd.com/doc/46442715/Deutsche-Bank-v-FDIC-Chase-JP-Morgan-WAMU

Legal Notice to State of Minnesota via DFL Gub. Mark Dayton et al DFLAttorneyGeneral Lori Swanson, DFL Co. Attorney John Choi (former city attry)Sheriff DFL Matt Bostrom andDFL Kathy Lantry Chair City Council and DFL Police Chief Tom Smith and DFL Mayor Chris Coleman et al.

Metro Gang Strike Force Settlement ie:

ISSUES:

(1) http://www.lawlessamerica.com/ Bill Windsor Today Government Corruption.

(2) St.Paul City Council Agenda Constitutionality thereof:

1 thro 9 Consent Agenda: out of 31 Items:

Wed. 2Mar2011 St.Paul City Hall.

http://stpaul.legistar.com/Calendar.aspx

(3) By information an belief the Highland Villager states that Robberys at St.Mary Church and Midway Rainbow 26Jan2011, Sharon was Robbed Mon.7Feb2011 unabated by Police Chief Tom Smith, Don Luna his assistant former city clerk and NOT A LICENSED COP, YET GETTING COPS PAY,PENSION ETC.

(4) Has the City of St.Paul using "Disparate Impact" against the Citizenery and the Landlords RICO Claims unabated by the Appointed Police Chief's Defendant John Harrington

RECORDS FOLLOW THE OFFICE NOT THE DEFENDANTS.

Therefore: Affiant Sharon Scarrella Anderson In re: Scarrella4Justice 221NW2d562

states and alleges that the attorneys for the Settlement and Special Master Mark Gehan

are hereby noticed that the Metro Gang Strike Force Settlement

the apparent Cop Corruption is still an ongong "Patterened Enterprise" acting in concort with defendant city of st. Paul.

However there is one such case that the landlords have held on for something like eight years now. After the Federal Eighth CIrcuit Court of Appeals issued an opinion favorable to the landlords, the city of St Paul has petitioned the US Supreme Court for review (link to petition for review). You can read the amended original complaint that started this case here.

If the Supreme Court hears this case it will have a huge impact on all landlords who follow fair housing practices, i.e. don’t reject tenants tenants simply because they are a different color, nationality, religion, etc than their neighbors. One must really respect these property owners for the amount of sacrifice they have made to get this far.

The case alleges that St Paul housing inspection programs were used in a racially motivated manner to force racial minorities out of St Paul and that such actions violated the Fair Housing rights of the occupants. A very interesting point is a number of city employees including inspectors are on the hook personally in this suit. From a legal perspective they must defend

QUESTIONS PRESENTED FOR REVIEW

Has Sharon4Anderson Republican Candidate for MNAG et al recently Robbed at the Rainbow Midway Grocery Store, unabated now over 3 weeks by Police wilful deriliction of duties?

Has Sharon4Anderson been denied Police Protection because Sharon is a QuiTam_Relator in the http://www.mgsfsettlement.com/ 3 Million Settlement on the Citys Theft,Trespass,Treason via "taking" Sharons 91 Chrysler,Trailer,Water,13 Propertys because Sharon now is a Senior,Disabled, in a Protected Class and as a Republican now 4 St.Paul City Council v. David Thune Ward (2) from Sharons Legal Homestead Domicile at 1058 Summit St.Paul,MN.? on the Graves of Tenants in Common her Parents Bill and Bernice A. Peterson?

42 U.S.C. § 3604(a)-(b).
STATEMENT OF THE CASE
The issue of whether disparate impact analysis
applies to the Fair Housing Act has been percolating
among the circuits for two decades. In 2005, this
Court provided guidance to the question in Smith u.
City of Jackson, Miss. , 544 U.S. 228 (2005). In Smith,
a disparate impact theory of liability was found
cognizable under the Age Discrimination in
Employment Act (ADEA) based on the "identical text"
found in § 70 3(a)(2) of Title VI I and § 4(a)(2) of the
ADEA. In the case at bar, the petition for rehearing en
bane was denied, but the five judge dissent recognized
this important and timely issue and found that the
text in both the ADEA and Title VII contains
triggering language for a disparate impact analy sisqoB7

and related contracts,”

herein after WaMu substituted CitySt.Paul "fidicuary trust" assets in Condemantion of Propertys.

id.

Schedule 3.2. Further, the assets were purchased subject to “all liabilities” affecting those assets,as provided in Section 2.1. Without question, JPMC succeeded to all of WaMu’s interests,rights, obligations, and liabilities under the Governing Agreements, which, according toDBNTC, are for each Trust an integrated set of agreements governing the transfer of loans intothe Trust, the securitization of the loans in the Trust, the servicing of the loans, and the rights andobligations of all the parties to the transaction.

13. Such a transaction, in which the acquisition-date fair value of the net assets acquiredexceeds the purchase price, is literally considered a “bargain purchase” by GAAP standards.

See

FASB Statement (“SFAS”) No. 141R (Business Combinations) at iv-v (Fin. AccountingStandards Bd. 2007).Section 2.1 of the P&A Agreement, which governsJPMC’s assumption of WaMu’s liabilities, providedthat:14. Concluding that “[t]he fair value of the net assets of Washington Mutual’s bankingoperations exceeded the $1.9 billion purchase price,” by over $10 billion, JPMC ultimatelyrecorded a $2 billion “extraordinary gain” in 2008 and 2009. Ex. 9, JPMC 2009 Form 10-K(2/24/10) at 143-44; sEx. 8, JPMC 2008 Form 10-K (3/2/09) at 123-24.15. The P&A Agreement also stated that “[t]he conveyance of all assets” purchased by JPMC“shall be made . . . without any warranties whatsoever with respect to such assets, express orimplied, with respect to . . . freedom from liens or encumbrances (in whole or in part), orany other matters.” P&A Agreement § 3.3.

Case 1:09-cv-01656-RMC Document 54-1 Filed 11/22/10 Page 14 of 51

File #:

RES 11-275 Version:

Name:

Criminal Justice Information Integration Network

Type:

Resolution

Status:

Agenda Ready

File created:

2/3/2011

In control:

City Council

On agenda:

3/2/2011

Final action:

Title:

Authorizing the Police Department to enter into the a joint powers agreement with the Dakota County Criminal Justice Information Integration Network.

Sponsors:

Kathy Lantry

Attachments:

Criminal Justice Information Integration Network.pdf

File #:

RES 11-383 Version: 1

Name:

PW Agreement for Outside Counsel Services - Kennedy and Graven

Type:

Resolution

Status:

Agenda Ready

File created:

2/15/2011

In control:

City Council

On agenda:

3/2/2011

Final action:

Title:

Approving the agreement for outside counsel services between the Public Works Department and Kennedy and Graven. "To acquire Property Rights Maryland Ave.E Clarance to the Phalen VIllage" Affiant Sharon Anderson's inquiry is this the new CUB Grocery Store?

Sponsors:

Kathy Lantry

Attachments:

Outside Counsel Financial Analysis Form.pdf, Outside Counsel Agreement & Policy.pdf

http://stpaul.legistar.com/View.ashx?M=A&ID=138543&GUID=BE8C4025-8F1C-4D97-861D-BEEBB6EA4509
Affiant alleges the amount is in the Millions,

18 RES 11-346 Amending the financing and spending plans in the Saint Paul Regional Water Services
2010 Adopted Budget in the amount of $668,300 in reimbursable spending for SPRWS
work related to Metropolitan Councils Light Rail project, as recommended and
requested by Board Resolution No. 7097.
Sponsors: Harris
Changes to 2010 Adopted Budget Table
Council Resolution

BWC Resln. #7097
Financial Analysis Worksheet=3

10 Ord 11-12 Amending Charter Section 7.04 regarding elections. Constitutional Challenge of the Bizzare,Arbitrary,Discrimnatory raise of Filing Fees" from $50.00 dollars to $250.00 for Council and $500.00 for Mayor. WOW
Sponsors: Lantry
Charter Commission Letter of Transmittal.pdf
Public Hearing Notice
Attachments:
11 Ord 11-13 Amending Charter Section 2.05 regarding elected officials.
Sponsors: Lantry
Charter Commission Letter of Transmittal.pdf
Public Hearing Notice
Attachments:
12 Ord 11-14 Amending Charter Section 4.01.3 regarding decennial redistricting.
Sponsors: Lantry
Charter Commission Letter of Transmittal.pdf
Public Hearing Notice
Attachments:
Cityf

From: williamwindsor@bellsouth.net
To: bill@lawlessamerica.com
Sent: 2/26/2011 11:38:54 P.M. Central Standard Time
Subj: Government Corruption Crisis Conference - Sunday 5 - 7 pm EST

The Government Corruption Crisis Conference will be held TODAY – Sunday, February 27 from 5 to 7 pm Eastern Time.
Watch it by registering and logging in at www.shovio.com or click on this link and page down to the bottom of the page:
http://www.lawlessamerica.com/index.php/news/71-plans-for-battle-government-corruption-dishonesty/146-government-corruption-crisis-conference
Some Instructions for Participating
If you just want to watch, simply click on the arrow on the TV screen on the link above. You do not have to do anything else to watch and listen.
There are other options if you want to participate.
If you have a webcam, you will be seen on the broadcast when you speak, if I select you after you make a request. Anyone can call in and just talk (no camera). Please register so you will be all set for the conference. You must register and login to be able to participate by text, audio, or video.
When you are logged in, you will see five icons below the TV screen:
Thumb -- Click on this to become a fan of the broadcast.
Q? -- Click on this to send a private question or message to me.
Lips -- Click on the lips to request to be on the broadcast. You can be heard (like on the radio) if your computer has a microphone and you have a headset. You can be seen and heard if you have a webcam and a headset. REMEMBER: You cannot have your computer speakers on if you are on the broadcast because they will cause feedback.
Person icon -- Click for Profile.
Group icon -- Chat with a group of viewers.
You will also see a text window with the word "Send" to the right. Enter public comments or questions here, and they will scroll on the TV screen.
I will also try to check email during the show, so if you want to send me an email, please do.
Please join us!
Bill
William M. Windsor
bill@billwindsor.com
Office: 770-578-1094

/s/ Sharon4Anderson@aol.com ECF_P165913_sa1299 Attorney Pro Se_InFact,Private Attorney General Sharon4 Anderson - Google Profile ,Candidate 2010 iGoogle http://www.sharonagmn2010.blogspot.com/ Homestead Act of 1862 Blogger: User Profile: Sharon Anderson SharonsYahoo!
Shar1058's Buzz Activity Page - My Buzz Activity - Yahoo! Buzz
political ?(Sharon4Anderson?)
Sharon Anderson's Blog Click here: Sharon4Council file4[1]Shar_thune_22.pdf - Google Docs
Disclaimer on Site'sThe Electronic Communications Privacy Act MY FindLaw (ECPA) sets out the provisions for access, use, disclosure, interception and privacy protections of electronic communications. Sharon4Anderson Scribd pdf files. The law was enacted in 1986 and covers various forms of wire and electronic communications. According to the U.S. Code, electronic communications "means any transfer of signs, signals, writing, images, sounds, data, or intelligence of any nature transmitted in whole or in part by a wire, radio, electromagnetic, photo electronic or photo optical system that affects interstate or foreign commerce." ECPA prohibits unlawful access and certain disclosures of communication contents. Additionally, the law prevents government entities from requiring disclosure of electronic communications from a provider without proper procedure. The Legal Institute provides Title 18 of the U.S. Code, which encompasses ECPA. Blogger: Dashboard
NOTICE: This communication is not encrypted. This e-mail (including any attachments) is covered by the Electronic Communications Privacy Act, 18 U.S.C. §§ 2510-2521, and Electronic Communications Privacy Act The CAN-SPAM Act: Requirements for Commercial Emailers

SharonvsJusticeGildeaQuidProQuo

Sun20Oct2019 TO THE ABOVE NAMED;SERVICE ELECTRONICALLY,EMAIL,SOCIAL MEDIA AND BLOGS CRIMINAL ALLEGATIONS RICO RE QUID PRO QUO NO FILING FEE4WHISTLEBLOWER ATTORNEY PRO SE PRIVATE ATTORNEY GENERAL RE QUITAM STATE OF MINNESOTA IN SUPREME COURT A19-0916Minnesota Judicial Branch - BioChief Justice Lorie Skjerven GildeaSupreme CourtSend an email via our contact formState Court Administrator's Office(651) 296-2474 (phone)(651) 297-5636 (fax)Minnesota Judicial Center (MJC) Suite #: 13525 Rev. Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. Blvd.St. Paul, MN 55155 Sharon Anderson Ward 2 QuiTam Relator White,Widow,WhistleblowerName: Sharon AndersonPublic Office Sought: Saint Paul City Council Email: Sharon4Anderson@aol.comPhone: 651-776-5835Website: sharon4council.blogspot.comTwitter Handle: @sharon4andersonFacebook: Sharon Anderson2019 Saint paul Voter Guide City St.Paul QuidProQuo unabated by Chief Justice Lorie Gildea QUESTIONS 1. Citys Trash/Garbarge Contract 11Nov2017 techinally must be voided, basedon Asst. City Attorney Rachael Tierney, Sarah Grewing, then and today giving legal Advise to past and present Council to Malign, usurp City Charter, triggeHouse Committee on Oversight and Government Reformrs Ineffective Assistance of City Council's Resolutions Ord 18-39 further Quid Pro Quo. VoteNo Save our Charter. 2. Has Chief Justice Lorie S.Gildea Covertly by Published Order indirectly,directlOPA190916-101619.pd pg 3 further over 6,000 signed signatures mandates Investigations over and above the 5Nov2019 Ballot and Elections. a. City Attorneys simulating legal process's for Citys Pecuniary Gain.? Cash Cow 4 Lawyers.Quid Pro QuoAlmanac - Twin Cities PBS .ATTY GENERAL ELLISON, ST PAUL TRASH FIGHT, DAYTON’S PORTRAITMN Attorney General Ellison, Hazelden’s Mark Mishek, Former Gov Dayton portrait More 3. Legal Notice re Separation of Powers, the Landlord Case and now Trash Casewithout MN Attorney General Mike Hatch,Lory Swanson and now Current MNAG Keith Ellison, intervention to Protect the State Laws, Constitution State and Federal as mentioned, 4. Has Justice Lorie Gildea in her Official Capacity looked the other way on other Lawsuits vs. City St. Paul, specifically USSC10-1032 Titled Magner vs. GallagherHouse Committee on Oversight and Government Reform The quid pro quo between the Department of Justice and the City of St. Paul, Minnesota, is largely the result of the machinations of one man: Assistant Attorney General Thomas Perez. Yet the consequences of his actions will negatively affect not only Fredrick Newell and the lowincome residents of St. Paul who he championed. The effects of this quid pro quo will be felt by future whistleblowers who act courageously, and often at great personal risk, to fight fraud and identify waste on behalf of federal taxpayers. The effects of withdrawing Magner will be felt by the minority tenants in St. Paul who, due to the case’s challenge to the City’s housing code, continue to live with rampant rodent infestations and inadequate plumbing. The effects of sacrificing Newell’s case will cost American taxpayers the opportunity to recover up to $200 million and allow St. Paul’s misdeeds to go unpunished. Far more troubling, however, is the fundamental damage that this quid pro quo has done to the rule of law in the United States and to the reputation of the Department of Justice as a fair and impartial arbiter of justice 5, Has Chief Justice Lorie Gildea overreached her Personal and Official Duties, re; Committment Panel is Cap knowing appointment of members ie Knutson,Gearin,Smith,Metzen,Asphaug, etal knowing Public Distaste,Distrust of these Judges b. 59 yr Restraining Orders, Restraint of Free Speech, by Gearin Ordering Web Sites taken down or Criminal Charges. BIZZARE. see Memorandum below. re Dede Evavald, Sharon Anderson re Concern Darlene Winters Trust Acct. Sandra Grazzini et alOpinions-Unpublished?Archives https://opinions-unpublished.blogspot.com/2013/Sharons-CourtRecords: In the Matter Darlene WinterPO62-14-696_HS1113StPaulAveElmer MackSocWorker postconviction court’s factual findings, not only does the majority depart from our precedent, but it also places Minnesota out of step with courts across the country. See, e.g., Bennett v. United States, 663 F.3d 71, 85 (2d Cir. 2011) (explaining that its deference to the findings made by district court in the course of deciding an ineffectiveness claim reflected “the superiority of the trial judge’s position to make determinations of credibility since only the trial judge can be aware of the variations in demeanor and tone of voice that bear so heavily on the listener’s understanding of and belief in what is said” (citation omitted) (internal quotation marked omitted)); Ahmed v. Redman, 782 F.2d 409, 412 (3d Cir. 1986) (explaining that the statutory presumption of correctness attaches to the subsidiary findings of historical fact that are relevant to the resolution of mixed questions of fact and law raised by a claim of ineffective assistance of counsel); United States v. Auerbach, 745 F.2d 1157, 1161 (8th Cir. 1984) (explaining that, “[w]e will affirm a district court’s finding that a habeas petitioner was denied effective assistance of counsel where the district court’s findings of fact which support the conclusion of law are not clearly erroneous”); Gaines v. Comm’r of Corr., 51 A.3d 948, 959-60, 966 (Conn. 2012) (explaining that the postconviction Complaints vs. Justice Lorie Gildea Lorie Skjerven Gildea - Wikipedia Because of Gildea's discrimination to favor women, the men have been left homeless, destroyed livelihoods, forced into squalor, and, most importantly, damaged their families. Gildea has condoned these smear campaigns that are OPA091641-0531.pdfused to prevent the men from speaking. postconviction court’s factual findings, not only does the majority depart from our precedent, but it also places Minnesota out of step with courts across the country. See, e.g., Bennett v. United States, 663 F.3d 71, 85 (2d Cir. 2011) (explaining that its deference to the findings made by district court in the course of deciding an ineffectiveness claim reflected “the superiority of the trial judge’s position to make determinations of credibility since only the trial judge can be aware of the variations in demeanor and tone of voice that bear so heavily on the listener’s understanding of and belief in what is said” (citation omitted) (internal quotation marked omitted)); Ahmed v. Redman, 782 F.2d 409, 412 (3d Cir. 1986) (explaining that the statutory presumption of correctness attaches to the subsidiary findings of historical fact that are relevant to the resolution of mixed questions of fact and law raised by a claim of ineffective assistance of counsel); United States v. Auerbach, 745 F.2d 1157, 1161 (8th Cir. 1984) (explaining that, “[w]e will affirm a district court’s finding that a habeas petitioner was denied effective assistance of counsel where the district court’s findings of fact which support the conclusion of law are not clearly erroneous”); Gaines v. Comm’r of Corr., 51 A.3d 948, 959-60, 966 (Conn. 2012) (explaining that the postconviction OPINIONS OF THESUPREME COURTFILED WEDNESDAY, OCTOBER 16, 2019NOTICE - MEDIA RELEASE TIME IS 10:00 A.M.A19-0916 Bruce Clark, et al., Respondents, vs. City of Saint Paul, et al., Appellants. Ramsey County. 1. A referendum on a Saint Paul ordinance that establishes organized waste collection services does not conflict with the requirements in Minn. Stat. §§ 115A.94–.941 (2018), that municipalities ensure that residents have waste collection services including through appropriate local controls, because ordinances that are not subject to the referendum fulfill those requirements and the Legislature intended that municipalities have broad authority in the process for establishing organized waste collection. 2. A referendum on an ordinance that establishes organized waste collection services in the City does not impair the City’s contract obligations under the Contract Clauses of the United States and Minnesota Constitutions. Affirmed. Chief Justice Lorie S. Gildea.OPA190916-101619.pdfA18-0121 Ambree Getz, Respondent, vs. Eila Kaarina Peace, et al., Appellants. Court of Appeals.Email Please note: your email will become part of the public record. Phone: 651-266-8560Fax: 651-266-8574Dai Thao, Ward 1 | Jane L. Prince, Ward 7 | Chris Tolbert, Ward 3 | Amy Brendmoen, Ward 5 and Council President | Kassim Busuri, Ward 6| Mitra Jalali Nelson, Ward 4 | Rebecca Noecker, Ward 2Coordinated Collection | Saint Paul, Minnesota City Attorney | Saint Paul, MinnesotaCoordinated Collection | Saint Paul, MinnesotaThis contract provides a solid base to transition the city to Coordinated Collection and meets the priorities that the Council laid out for the negotiating team. See Final Contract, Final Contract Exhibits, and First Amendment.52 Organizer Ramac Franklin OrganizePageRight-click here to select Foth Office Search | Saint Paul, Minnesota| Code of Ordinances | St. Paul, MN | Municode LibrarySec. 14.01. - Power to levy assessments.Sec. 14.01.1. - Preliminary assessment.Sec. 14.01.2. - Charge for services.Sec. 14.01.3. - Reassessment.Sec. 14.01.4. - Appeal.Sec. 14.01.5. - Trial.Sec. 14.01.6. - Collection.Sec. 14.02. - Special assessment—Alternative procedure.City of Saint Paul - Meeting of City Council on 10/23/2019 at 3:30 PMRES 19-186417Authorizing the City of Saint Paul to enter into an agreement with the Minnesota Department of Revenue for the collection of Local Sales, Use Tax, and a Lodging Tax.ResolutionAuthorizing the City of Saint Paul to enter into an agreement with the Minnesota Department of Revenue for the collection of Local Sales, Use Tax, and a Lodging Tax.Ord 19-67117OrdinanceAmending section 220.05 of the Legislative Code to set rates for base level garbage service to be effective January 1, 2020.Businesses | Minnesota Department of RevenueAlcoholic Beverage TaxCigarette and Tobacco TaxesCorporation Franchise TaxEnergy Production TaxesEnvironmental Taxes and FeesEstate TaxFiduciary TaxGambling TaxesInsurance TaxesMining and Mineral Taxes MinnesotaCare TaxesMortgage Registry and Deed TaxPartnership TaxPetroleum TaxProperty TaxesS Corporation TaxSales and Use TaxUnrelated Business Income TaxWithholding Taxxx DetailsReportsFile #:Ord 19-67 Version: 1Name:Type:OrdinanceStatus:Second ReadingIn control:City CouncilFinal action:Title:Amending section 220.05 of the Legislative Code to set rates for base level garbage service to be effective January 1, 2020.Sponsors:Amy BrendmoenHistory (1)TextPublic Comments (2) Add New Comment2 recordsGroupExportDate NameDistrictOpinionCommentAction10/17/2019 6:51 PMCandidateSharonAndersonAgainstPlease read http://sharons-fraudupdate.blogspot.comForensic Files http://sharon4anderson.orgViolation of Charter,Ballot Vote No now Rate Setting Ponzi Taxing Scheme10/17/2019 10:24 AMCandidateSharonAndersonAgainstFor years Council has set Rates for NonProfit District Heating, now setting Rates for Trash a for Profit Business creates Contract Impairment, contrary to Private Citizens to do Business http://taxthemax.blogspot.comtherefore creating a Monoply,AntiTrustxxIN RE: Vanessa Yolanda REW | FindLaw Thomas A. Gilligan, Jr., Murnane Brandt, Saint Paul, MN, for respondent. James Allen Bergstrom, Roseville, MN, pro se. Lori Swanson, Attorney General, Alan I. Gilbert, Solicitor General, Michael Everson, Assistant Attorney General, Saint Paul, MN, for amicus curiae Minnesota Attorney General MEMORANDUM JUSTICE LORIE GILDEA'S50yrRestraining Orders 2019 - The Provocateurhttp://theeprovocateur.blogspot.com/2019/theeprovocateur.blogspot.com › ...The Minnesota Supreme Court, led by Judge Lorie Gildea, has to twist itself into ..... granted David Rucki a fifty (50) year restraining order against Dede Evavold. Now What Sharons latest http://sharonvcitystpaul.blogspot.com and http://citizenery-mncourts.blogspot.com651) 291-5297 (CAP) is defined by Minn. Stat. § 253B.19. Panel One - Judge AsphaugPanel Two - Judge RancourtPanel Three – Judge TilsenMinnesota Judicial Branch - Clerk of Appellate Courts Fri.18Oct2019 Tracking Opinions via Justice Lori GildeaMinnesota Judicial Branch - Clerk of Appellate CourtsBlogItBabeSandraGrazzini-Rucki,Pauper,ChildSupportviaJusticeLorieGildeahttps://theeprovocateur.blogspot.com/2019/09/sandra-grazzini-rucki-pauper-who-should.ht Just a Note re Kathleen Gearin Tolbert served as a law clerk for Ramsey County Chief Judge Kathleen Gearin, and then became an assistant attorney for Hennepin County. Other experience includes serving on the League of Minnesota Cities Board ofhttps://www.slideshare.net/Sharon4Anderson/affidavit-prejudicejudge-kathleen-gearinhttps://www.documentcloud.org/documents/4417581-19AVCV171950Order03212018.html re Dede EvavaldThursday, September 26, 2019Sandra Grazzini-Rucki, A Pauper Who Should Pay Child SupportThe Provocateur: Sandra Grazzini-Rucki, A Pauper Who Should Pay Child Supporthttps://theeprovocateur.blogspot.com/2019/09/sandra-grazzini-rucki-pauper-who-should.html?fbclid=IwAR2jTKIsegFHNzLh-mS5anl14m5aNneGU2cgYPTpZREsNTcVSqxZhDF52pcSharon Anderson aka Scarrella 651-776-5835 sharon4anderson@aol.comhttp://blogitbabe.blogspot.com http://sharon4council.blogspot.comLEGAL NOTICE: /s/Sharon4Anderson@aol.com ECF_P165913Pacersa1299 telfx: 651-776-5835:Attorney ProSe_InFact,Private Attorney General QuiTam Whistleblower, www.taxthemax.blogspot.com The Electronic Communications Privacy Act, 18 U.S.C. Ch.119 Sections 2510-2521 et seq., governs distribution of this "Message," including attachments, may contain the originator'sproprietary information. The originator hereby notifiesrecipients Message review, dissemination, copying, and content-based actions. Authorized carriers of this message shall expeditiously deliver this Message to intended recipients. See: Quon v. Arch