Sharon4CouncilWard2: WhistleblowersSharon Anderson,Bill Dahn,Cand.ST.PaulMayor v. CityClerkShari Moore et al

Wednesday, November 5, 2008

WhistleblowersSharon Anderson,Bill Dahn,Cand.ST.PaulMayor v. CityClerkShari Moore et al

Subj:	Fwd: WhistleblowersSharon Anderson,Bill Dahn,Cand.ST.PaulMayor v. CityClerkSh...
Date:	11/5/2008 2:16:41 P.M. Central Standard Time
From:	Sharon4Anderson
To:	dorrick@pioneerpress.com
CC:	gljoe@am1500.com, tfladung@pioneerpress.com

Obama: FCA Attorney
Barack Obama's first job out of Harvard Law School was with Miner Barnhill & Galland, where he wrote a major portion of an appeals brief for the Chandler False Claims Act case which ultimately went to the Supreme Court (TAF filed an amicus). Chandler was settled in December of 2006 for $5 million. >> To read more
Above the Law - A Legal Tabloid - News, Gossip, and Colorful Commentary on Law Firms and the Legal Profession - Lawyers Poise...The ABA Journal has sounded the starting gun on speculation about the lawyers ready to take prominent roles in the new administration. Depending on the presidential victor, names you know will become names that everybody knows.

11/05/2008

Video

02h 40m

Agenda

Wed.5Nov08
TO :US Justice Dept,FBI,St.Paul City Clerk,Shari Moore,Ramsey Co. Auditor Mark Oswald, 2nd Judicial Court Administrator Larry Dease, MN Governor Tim Pawlenty, DFL Attorney General
Lori Swanson @ www.ag.state.mn.us Minnesota Attorney General's Office
1400 Bremer Tower 445 Minnesota Street St. Paul, MN 55101 (651) 296-3353 (800) 657-3787
Request for State and Federal Audits of the Budget of City of St.Paul, City Council Agends'a in their entirity.

Federal Bureau of Investigation - Minneapolis Division Address:
RALPH S BOELTER
Special Agent in Charge RICHARD T. THORNTON
Assistant Special Agent in Charge

TIMOTHY F. GOSSFELD
Assistant Special Agent in Charge JOSEPH A. WALSH JR
Admimistrative Officer PAUL A. McCABE
Media Coordinator Federal Bureau of Investigation
111 Washington Avenue South
Suite 1100
Minneapolis, MN 55401

Phone: (612) 376-3200
Fax: (612) 376-3249
TO THE ABOVE NAMED: AFFIANT's SHARON ANDERSON aka PETERSO
Coleman claims victory; Franken wants recount
MN U.S. Senate race results
Click here for all election results
After nearly two years of campaigning
N-CHERGOSKY-1ST HUSBAND SCARRELLA AND BILL DAHN
CONGRATULATIONS TO THE MR. PRESIDENT ELECT BARACK OBAMA, ALL CANDIDATES IN THE US. "but for" http://sharon4council.blogspot.com/ victims of Wire and Mail Fraud.

AFFIANTS HEREBY STATE AND ALLEGE: AS Victims of Reverse Racisim for over 20 years, http://www.billdahn.blogspot.com/ , http://www.sharonanderson.org/ , victims of heinous,repugnant discrimination primarily from the DFL party, when Skippy Humphrey and DFL Norm Coleman, attorney in the http://www.ag.state.mn.us/ office, then DFL ST.Paul Mayor Norm Coleman, up to the present DFLChris Coleman, with False Records, Ordinances based on Theft, Trespass, Treason, unabated by the Powers to Be.

WE: Sharon and Bill remain Council Watcher's by e-commerce every Wed. to challenge the Agenda's wilful neglience to implement pdf files, Consent Agenda serious violations of Open Meeting Laws,

City Council Meeting November 5, 2008 - 03:30 PM Agenda

COUNT I MS 609.43
Resolution 5. Sharon Anderson v. Shari Moore - Google Search
5. Resolution - 08-1171 - Accepting the gifts of airfare and lodging, valued at $1,079.00, plus meals, from the International Institute of Municipal Clerks (IIMC) for City Clerk Shari Moore to attend their mid-year board of directors meeting on November 7 and 8, 2008 in Riverside, CA. (GS 3060978)

GS3060978-Resolution
Sharon4StateRep64A: Sharon Anderson_Bill Dahn Challenge Canvass Boards 4 Separation of Powers Please Note 7Nov08 Shari Moore CANNOT be in two places at one time County Canvass Board. Heinous Criminal Conflict MS609.43 re: Sharon 1/2 Million Claim
Answer/Cross/1/2MillionClaim v.CitySt.Paul
COUNT II
iTEM 6 re: http://billdahn.blogspot.com/ Item 11 Violence against Woman Item 38 ROW Assessments, objections by e-commerce unabated by officials.
38. Resolution - 08-1204 - Setting Right-of-Way fees for the period January 1, 2009 to December 31, 2009. (GS 3060295)

GS3060295-Resolution

GS3060295-Proposed 2009 Disruption Costs Basis

GS3060295-Proposed 2009 Permit Fee Structure

GS3060295-Proposed 2009 Permit Rates

Items 40, approving Assessments without decending to particulars, specific address,
http://stpaul.granicus.com/MetaViewer.php?view_id=37&event_id=40&meta_id=50778
Item 41
41. Resolution - 08-1207 - Adopting the 2008 Neighborhood STAR Large Loan and Grant Program. (GS 3059409)

297A - GENERAL SALES AND USE TAXES, 2008 Minnesota Statutes GS3059409-Resolution

GS3059409- Attachment A
Item 61 Homeland Security

http://stpaul.granicus.com/MetaViewer.php?view_id=37&event_id=40&meta_id=50822
Item 79 STAR lAN

http://stpaul.granicus.com/MetaViewer.php?view_id=37&event_id=40&meta_id=50859 Dear Ms. Anderson,

Here is the list of canvassing board members as requested:
Commissioner Janice Rettman
Commissioner Toni Carter
County Auditor Mark Oswald
2^nd District Court Administrator Lawrence Dease
St. Paul City Clerk Shari Moore
The canvassing board will meet on November 7^th at 11:30 am in the Plato Conference Room at 90 W Plato Blvd, St Paul, MN 55107.
Megan Haugen

Ramsey County Elections
P.O. Box 64098
St. Paul, MN 55164
Phone: (651) 266-2171
Fax: (651) 266-2177-----------------
Forwarded Message: derson_Bill Dahn Challenge Canvass Boards 4 Separation of Powers
Subj: State Canvassing Board Members
Date: 10/31/2008 7:59:32 A.M. Central Standard Time
From: Elections.Dept@state.mn.us
To: sharon4anderson@aol.com
Sent from the Internet (Details)

OFFICE OF THE MINNESOTA SECRETARY OF STATE
Elections Division
Date: October 31, 2008
To: Sharon Anderson
From: Brad Anderson
Election Administrator
Office of the Minnesota Secretary of State
SUBJECT: Members of the State Canvassing Board for State Primary Election and State General Election
Thank you for contacting the Office of the Minnesota Secretary of State with your concern about the members of the State Canvassing Board. Here are the members of the State Canvassing Board for the 2008 State Primary and the expected members for the 2008 State General Election:
September 16, 2008 State Canvassing Board Meeting (State Primary):
Mark Ritchie – Secretary of State
Chief Justice Eric Magnuson – Minnesota Supreme Court
The Honorable Associate Justice Helen Meyer – Minnesota Supreme Court
The Honorable Patricia Kerr Karasov – Judge of District Court
The Honorable Marybeth Dorn – Judge of District Court
November 18, 2008 State Canvassing Board Meeting (State General Election) (Expected):
Mark Ritchie – Secretary of State
Chief Justice Eric Magnuson – Supreme Court
The Honorable Justice G. Barry Anderson – Supreme Court
The Honorable Kathleen Gearin – Judge of District Court
The Honorable Dale Lindman – Judge of District Court
I hope that this information is helpful. If you have any questions please let me know. Thanks again for contacting the Office of the Minnesota Secretary of State with your concerns.

-----------------

NOTICE: E-mail correspondence to and from the Office of the Secretary of State of Minnesota may be public data subject to the Minnesota Data Practices Act and/or may be disclosed to third parties

Click here: Sharon4StateRep64A

http://www.ag.state.mn.us/ElectronicForms/complaintform.pdf

Submitted in Good Faith /s/ Bill Dahn and /s/ Sharon Anderson Candidates for Mayor http://sharon4mayor2010.blogspot.com ,

/s/ Sharon4Anderson@aol.com ECF_P165913_sa1299 Click here: Sharon4Council file4[1]Shar_thune_22.pdf - Google Docs
Disclaimer on Site'sThe Electronic Communications Privacy Act MY FindLaw (ECPA) sets out the provisions for access, use, disclosure, interception and privacy protections of electronic communications. Sharon4Anderson Scribd pdf files. The law was enacted in 1986 and covers various forms of wire and electronic communications. According to the U.S. Code, electronic communications "means any transfer of signs, signals, writing, images, sounds, data, or intelligence of any nature transmitted in whole or in part by a wire, radio, electromagnetic, photo electronic or photo optical system that affects interstate or foreign commerce." ECPA prohibits unlawful access and certain disclosures of communication contents. Additionally, the law prevents government entities from requiring disclosure of electronic communications from a provider without proper procedure. The Legal Institute provides Title 18 of the U.S. Code, which encompasses ECPA. Blogger: Dashboard AndersonAdvocates/ddaweborg.msnw
NOTICE: This communication is not encrypted. This e-mail (including any attachments) is covered by the Electronic Communications Privacy Act, 18 U.S.C. §§ 2510-2521, and Electronic Communications Privacy Act The CAN-SPAM Act: Requirements for Commercial Emailers

SharonvsJusticeGildeaQuidProQuo

Sun20Oct2019 TO THE ABOVE NAMED;SERVICE ELECTRONICALLY,EMAIL,SOCIAL MEDIA AND BLOGS CRIMINAL ALLEGATIONS RICO RE QUID PRO QUO NO FILING FEE4WHISTLEBLOWER ATTORNEY PRO SE PRIVATE ATTORNEY GENERAL RE QUITAM STATE OF MINNESOTA IN SUPREME COURT A19-0916Minnesota Judicial Branch - BioChief Justice Lorie Skjerven GildeaSupreme CourtSend an email via our contact formState Court Administrator's Office(651) 296-2474 (phone)(651) 297-5636 (fax)Minnesota Judicial Center (MJC) Suite #: 13525 Rev. Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. Blvd.St. Paul, MN 55155 Sharon Anderson Ward 2 QuiTam Relator White,Widow,WhistleblowerName: Sharon AndersonPublic Office Sought: Saint Paul City Council Email: Sharon4Anderson@aol.comPhone: 651-776-5835Website: sharon4council.blogspot.comTwitter Handle: @sharon4andersonFacebook: Sharon Anderson2019 Saint paul Voter Guide City St.Paul QuidProQuo unabated by Chief Justice Lorie Gildea QUESTIONS 1. Citys Trash/Garbarge Contract 11Nov2017 techinally must be voided, basedon Asst. City Attorney Rachael Tierney, Sarah Grewing, then and today giving legal Advise to past and present Council to Malign, usurp City Charter, triggeHouse Committee on Oversight and Government Reformrs Ineffective Assistance of City Council's Resolutions Ord 18-39 further Quid Pro Quo. VoteNo Save our Charter. 2. Has Chief Justice Lorie S.Gildea Covertly by Published Order indirectly,directlOPA190916-101619.pd pg 3 further over 6,000 signed signatures mandates Investigations over and above the 5Nov2019 Ballot and Elections. a. City Attorneys simulating legal process's for Citys Pecuniary Gain.? Cash Cow 4 Lawyers.Quid Pro QuoAlmanac - Twin Cities PBS .ATTY GENERAL ELLISON, ST PAUL TRASH FIGHT, DAYTON’S PORTRAITMN Attorney General Ellison, Hazelden’s Mark Mishek, Former Gov Dayton portrait More 3. Legal Notice re Separation of Powers, the Landlord Case and now Trash Casewithout MN Attorney General Mike Hatch,Lory Swanson and now Current MNAG Keith Ellison, intervention to Protect the State Laws, Constitution State and Federal as mentioned, 4. Has Justice Lorie Gildea in her Official Capacity looked the other way on other Lawsuits vs. City St. Paul, specifically USSC10-1032 Titled Magner vs. GallagherHouse Committee on Oversight and Government Reform The quid pro quo between the Department of Justice and the City of St. Paul, Minnesota, is largely the result of the machinations of one man: Assistant Attorney General Thomas Perez. Yet the consequences of his actions will negatively affect not only Fredrick Newell and the lowincome residents of St. Paul who he championed. The effects of this quid pro quo will be felt by future whistleblowers who act courageously, and often at great personal risk, to fight fraud and identify waste on behalf of federal taxpayers. The effects of withdrawing Magner will be felt by the minority tenants in St. Paul who, due to the case’s challenge to the City’s housing code, continue to live with rampant rodent infestations and inadequate plumbing. The effects of sacrificing Newell’s case will cost American taxpayers the opportunity to recover up to $200 million and allow St. Paul’s misdeeds to go unpunished. Far more troubling, however, is the fundamental damage that this quid pro quo has done to the rule of law in the United States and to the reputation of the Department of Justice as a fair and impartial arbiter of justice 5, Has Chief Justice Lorie Gildea overreached her Personal and Official Duties, re; Committment Panel is Cap knowing appointment of members ie Knutson,Gearin,Smith,Metzen,Asphaug, etal knowing Public Distaste,Distrust of these Judges b. 59 yr Restraining Orders, Restraint of Free Speech, by Gearin Ordering Web Sites taken down or Criminal Charges. BIZZARE. see Memorandum below. re Dede Evavald, Sharon Anderson re Concern Darlene Winters Trust Acct. Sandra Grazzini et alOpinions-Unpublished?Archives https://opinions-unpublished.blogspot.com/2013/Sharons-CourtRecords: In the Matter Darlene WinterPO62-14-696_HS1113StPaulAveElmer MackSocWorker postconviction court’s factual findings, not only does the majority depart from our precedent, but it also places Minnesota out of step with courts across the country. See, e.g., Bennett v. United States, 663 F.3d 71, 85 (2d Cir. 2011) (explaining that its deference to the findings made by district court in the course of deciding an ineffectiveness claim reflected “the superiority of the trial judge’s position to make determinations of credibility since only the trial judge can be aware of the variations in demeanor and tone of voice that bear so heavily on the listener’s understanding of and belief in what is said” (citation omitted) (internal quotation marked omitted)); Ahmed v. Redman, 782 F.2d 409, 412 (3d Cir. 1986) (explaining that the statutory presumption of correctness attaches to the subsidiary findings of historical fact that are relevant to the resolution of mixed questions of fact and law raised by a claim of ineffective assistance of counsel); United States v. Auerbach, 745 F.2d 1157, 1161 (8th Cir. 1984) (explaining that, “[w]e will affirm a district court’s finding that a habeas petitioner was denied effective assistance of counsel where the district court’s findings of fact which support the conclusion of law are not clearly erroneous”); Gaines v. Comm’r of Corr., 51 A.3d 948, 959-60, 966 (Conn. 2012) (explaining that the postconviction Complaints vs. Justice Lorie Gildea Lorie Skjerven Gildea - Wikipedia Because of Gildea's discrimination to favor women, the men have been left homeless, destroyed livelihoods, forced into squalor, and, most importantly, damaged their families. Gildea has condoned these smear campaigns that are OPA091641-0531.pdfused to prevent the men from speaking. postconviction court’s factual findings, not only does the majority depart from our precedent, but it also places Minnesota out of step with courts across the country. See, e.g., Bennett v. United States, 663 F.3d 71, 85 (2d Cir. 2011) (explaining that its deference to the findings made by district court in the course of deciding an ineffectiveness claim reflected “the superiority of the trial judge’s position to make determinations of credibility since only the trial judge can be aware of the variations in demeanor and tone of voice that bear so heavily on the listener’s understanding of and belief in what is said” (citation omitted) (internal quotation marked omitted)); Ahmed v. Redman, 782 F.2d 409, 412 (3d Cir. 1986) (explaining that the statutory presumption of correctness attaches to the subsidiary findings of historical fact that are relevant to the resolution of mixed questions of fact and law raised by a claim of ineffective assistance of counsel); United States v. Auerbach, 745 F.2d 1157, 1161 (8th Cir. 1984) (explaining that, “[w]e will affirm a district court’s finding that a habeas petitioner was denied effective assistance of counsel where the district court’s findings of fact which support the conclusion of law are not clearly erroneous”); Gaines v. Comm’r of Corr., 51 A.3d 948, 959-60, 966 (Conn. 2012) (explaining that the postconviction OPINIONS OF THESUPREME COURTFILED WEDNESDAY, OCTOBER 16, 2019NOTICE - MEDIA RELEASE TIME IS 10:00 A.M.A19-0916 Bruce Clark, et al., Respondents, vs. City of Saint Paul, et al., Appellants. Ramsey County. 1. A referendum on a Saint Paul ordinance that establishes organized waste collection services does not conflict with the requirements in Minn. Stat. §§ 115A.94–.941 (2018), that municipalities ensure that residents have waste collection services including through appropriate local controls, because ordinances that are not subject to the referendum fulfill those requirements and the Legislature intended that municipalities have broad authority in the process for establishing organized waste collection. 2. A referendum on an ordinance that establishes organized waste collection services in the City does not impair the City’s contract obligations under the Contract Clauses of the United States and Minnesota Constitutions. Affirmed. Chief Justice Lorie S. Gildea.OPA190916-101619.pdfA18-0121 Ambree Getz, Respondent, vs. Eila Kaarina Peace, et al., Appellants. Court of Appeals.Email Please note: your email will become part of the public record. Phone: 651-266-8560Fax: 651-266-8574Dai Thao, Ward 1 | Jane L. Prince, Ward 7 | Chris Tolbert, Ward 3 | Amy Brendmoen, Ward 5 and Council President | Kassim Busuri, Ward 6| Mitra Jalali Nelson, Ward 4 | Rebecca Noecker, Ward 2Coordinated Collection | Saint Paul, Minnesota City Attorney | Saint Paul, MinnesotaCoordinated Collection | Saint Paul, MinnesotaThis contract provides a solid base to transition the city to Coordinated Collection and meets the priorities that the Council laid out for the negotiating team. See Final Contract, Final Contract Exhibits, and First Amendment.52 Organizer Ramac Franklin OrganizePageRight-click here to select Foth Office Search | Saint Paul, Minnesota| Code of Ordinances | St. Paul, MN | Municode LibrarySec. 14.01. - Power to levy assessments.Sec. 14.01.1. - Preliminary assessment.Sec. 14.01.2. - Charge for services.Sec. 14.01.3. - Reassessment.Sec. 14.01.4. - Appeal.Sec. 14.01.5. - Trial.Sec. 14.01.6. - Collection.Sec. 14.02. - Special assessment—Alternative procedure.City of Saint Paul - Meeting of City Council on 10/23/2019 at 3:30 PMRES 19-186417Authorizing the City of Saint Paul to enter into an agreement with the Minnesota Department of Revenue for the collection of Local Sales, Use Tax, and a Lodging Tax.ResolutionAuthorizing the City of Saint Paul to enter into an agreement with the Minnesota Department of Revenue for the collection of Local Sales, Use Tax, and a Lodging Tax.Ord 19-67117OrdinanceAmending section 220.05 of the Legislative Code to set rates for base level garbage service to be effective January 1, 2020.Businesses | Minnesota Department of RevenueAlcoholic Beverage TaxCigarette and Tobacco TaxesCorporation Franchise TaxEnergy Production TaxesEnvironmental Taxes and FeesEstate TaxFiduciary TaxGambling TaxesInsurance TaxesMining and Mineral Taxes MinnesotaCare TaxesMortgage Registry and Deed TaxPartnership TaxPetroleum TaxProperty TaxesS Corporation TaxSales and Use TaxUnrelated Business Income TaxWithholding Taxxx DetailsReportsFile #:Ord 19-67 Version: 1Name:Type:OrdinanceStatus:Second ReadingIn control:City CouncilFinal action:Title:Amending section 220.05 of the Legislative Code to set rates for base level garbage service to be effective January 1, 2020.Sponsors:Amy BrendmoenHistory (1)TextPublic Comments (2) Add New Comment2 recordsGroupExportDate NameDistrictOpinionCommentAction10/17/2019 6:51 PMCandidateSharonAndersonAgainstPlease read http://sharons-fraudupdate.blogspot.comForensic Files http://sharon4anderson.orgViolation of Charter,Ballot Vote No now Rate Setting Ponzi Taxing Scheme10/17/2019 10:24 AMCandidateSharonAndersonAgainstFor years Council has set Rates for NonProfit District Heating, now setting Rates for Trash a for Profit Business creates Contract Impairment, contrary to Private Citizens to do Business http://taxthemax.blogspot.comtherefore creating a Monoply,AntiTrustxxIN RE: Vanessa Yolanda REW | FindLaw Thomas A. Gilligan, Jr., Murnane Brandt, Saint Paul, MN, for respondent. James Allen Bergstrom, Roseville, MN, pro se. Lori Swanson, Attorney General, Alan I. Gilbert, Solicitor General, Michael Everson, Assistant Attorney General, Saint Paul, MN, for amicus curiae Minnesota Attorney General MEMORANDUM JUSTICE LORIE GILDEA'S50yrRestraining Orders 2019 - The Provocateurhttp://theeprovocateur.blogspot.com/2019/theeprovocateur.blogspot.com › ...The Minnesota Supreme Court, led by Judge Lorie Gildea, has to twist itself into ..... granted David Rucki a fifty (50) year restraining order against Dede Evavold. Now What Sharons latest http://sharonvcitystpaul.blogspot.com and http://citizenery-mncourts.blogspot.com651) 291-5297 (CAP) is defined by Minn. Stat. § 253B.19. Panel One - Judge AsphaugPanel Two - Judge RancourtPanel Three – Judge TilsenMinnesota Judicial Branch - Clerk of Appellate Courts Fri.18Oct2019 Tracking Opinions via Justice Lori GildeaMinnesota Judicial Branch - Clerk of Appellate CourtsBlogItBabeSandraGrazzini-Rucki,Pauper,ChildSupportviaJusticeLorieGildeahttps://theeprovocateur.blogspot.com/2019/09/sandra-grazzini-rucki-pauper-who-should.ht Just a Note re Kathleen Gearin Tolbert served as a law clerk for Ramsey County Chief Judge Kathleen Gearin, and then became an assistant attorney for Hennepin County. Other experience includes serving on the League of Minnesota Cities Board ofhttps://www.slideshare.net/Sharon4Anderson/affidavit-prejudicejudge-kathleen-gearinhttps://www.documentcloud.org/documents/4417581-19AVCV171950Order03212018.html re Dede EvavaldThursday, September 26, 2019Sandra Grazzini-Rucki, A Pauper Who Should Pay Child SupportThe Provocateur: Sandra Grazzini-Rucki, A Pauper Who Should Pay Child Supporthttps://theeprovocateur.blogspot.com/2019/09/sandra-grazzini-rucki-pauper-who-should.html?fbclid=IwAR2jTKIsegFHNzLh-mS5anl14m5aNneGU2cgYPTpZREsNTcVSqxZhDF52pcSharon Anderson aka Scarrella 651-776-5835 sharon4anderson@aol.comhttp://blogitbabe.blogspot.com http://sharon4council.blogspot.comLEGAL NOTICE: /s/Sharon4Anderson@aol.com ECF_P165913Pacersa1299 telfx: 651-776-5835:Attorney ProSe_InFact,Private Attorney General QuiTam Whistleblower, www.taxthemax.blogspot.com The Electronic Communications Privacy Act, 18 U.S.C. Ch.119 Sections 2510-2521 et seq., governs distribution of this "Message," including attachments, may contain the originator'sproprietary information. The originator hereby notifiesrecipients Message review, dissemination, copying, and content-based actions. Authorized carriers of this message shall expeditiously deliver this Message to intended recipients. See: Quon v. Arch