Here’s my Facebook movie. Find yours at #FacebookIs10

Posted by Sharon Anderson on Monday, February 10, 2014

Steinhauser vs CitySt.Paul et al


Friday, October 19, 2007

St.Paul City Attorney Budget-Criminal Usury 1.1million outside bond counsel?

No discredit to Hilary, Happy Halloween to all City Budget is a TRICK of TAXACTION WITHOUT REPRESENTATION, Budget Committee
Back Forward Print Home

Granicus Inc.

can't wait for 2008 (w/sound)

TO THE ABOVE NAMED: Dave Thune and Bill Hosko
Candidate Sharon Anderson for State Rep64A is herewith demanding the
Investigation, Names,Salarys,Residence's of ALL St. Paul Attorneys
ALL outside counsel's with total costs interest rate etc.
Pursuant to the 17Oct07 Budget hearing found at Sharons newest Site
Fiducary Trust Budget Issues mandate elimination of the Office of City Attorney, 63 employees + outside counsel et al
now criminal usury , also demand Rep. John Lesch resignation to help balance the budget.

MINNESOTA, the legal rate of interest is 6%. The judgment rate is the "secondary market yield" for one year T-Bills. Usury limit is 8%.

Criminal Usury - Google Search and Pursuant to Forensic Evidence of City Attorneys Bizzare Budget
outside bond counsel at 1.1 million
The Taxpayers and this victim are not paying taxes for private law firms and or nonprofit city run ie: District Heating, SMRLS or intern lawyers from Briggs and Morgan

The Aftermath: Examining the E-Discovery Landscape After the 2006 Rule Changes
The denial of discovery Sharon cannot even get copies of Warrants,
Tickets, to "take" her driverlicense,propertys, without due process.
City of St. Paul is cooking the books, causing criminal usury
taxpayers paying for private attorneys to prosecute them is

The city of St. Paul's 16 million debt could be balanced to eliminate city attoneys
criminal usury minnesota - Google Search
Minnesota follows the general rule that usury is the taking or receiving of more interest or profit on a loan? of money or forbearance of indebtedness than the law allows.? St. Paul Bank for Coops. v. Ohman, 402 N.W.2d 235, 237 (Minn. App. 1987) (citation omitted).? To conclude that a usurious rate has been charged, a court must find

(a) A loan of money or forbearance of a debt; (b) an agreement between the parties that the principal shall be repayable absolutely; (c) the exaction of a greater amount of interest or profit than is allowed by law; and (d) the presence of an intention to evade the law at the inception of the transaction.

City council agenda for March 16th, 2005

Corrected First Amended Complaint and Demand for Jury Trial in the matter of Frank J. Steinhauser, III, Mark E. Meysembourg, and Kelly G. Brisson vs. the ... - 18k - Cached - Similar pages



SharonsSocratiesMethod TruthTrust4YOU

JURIST Paper Chase

Dayton's MN ShutDown Costs

2007 Sharon StPaul Ward(2) Election

Blog Directory for St Paul, MN

Snap Shots

Get Free Shots from


Sharon4Council: Empower Ethics Empathize Energize Educate:

Sharon4Council: Empower  Ethics Empathize Energize Educate:

My photo

VA Widow, Political-Realeste Entreprenuer, Blogger, More fun getting there than being there.
Favorite Saying " Supbonea God into the Court Room" aka Shewolfeagle , CobraShar